- Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the
Environment
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2016 |
One of the first changes made
by the new British Prime Minister, Theresa May, was to close the Department of
Energy and Climate Change and to transfer it to a new office, the Department of
Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy, a transfer heavily criticized by
environmental groups and its cheering main stream media who saw it as a
disaster to end the lucrative climate change industry.
The new agency will be
headed by Greg Clark who is believed to oppose wind power. Off shore companies
are worried, in light of Brexit, that financing for their wind-generated energy
projects, which depend heavily on subsidies to compete, will be affected.
U.K.’s Conservative Party
has cut green subsidies to protect consumers and the industry from potential brownouts
caused by insufficient energy on windless or cloudy days when they must depend
on fossil fuel-generated electricity. Energy prices are so much higher that “38
percent of British households have cut back essential purchases, like food, to
pay their energy bills.” http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/14/britain-shuts-down-its-global-warming-agency/#ixzz4Eral6yif
In this country, however,
the climate change industry has nothing to fear, the Sustainable Development
march, the lynchpin of Agenda 2030, continues unabated. Not only do they have
nothing to fear, on the contrary, according to Michael Bastasch, the Democrat
Party platform calls for prosecuting global warming skeptics.
“A provision is calling
for the Department of Justice to investigate companies who disagree with
Democrats on global warming science.” Following
New York’s Attorney General Eric Schneidermann’s investigation into Exxon,
“based on reporting from eco-left wing reporters at InsideClimate News and
Columbia University,” Republicans countered that, “if minimization is fraud,
exaggeration is fraud” too. http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/07/dem-party-platform-calls-for-prosecuting-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz4Ct2SmEol
But global warming/climate
change industry is just the tip of the iceberg of the 17-item Agenda 2030
proposed and pushed by the United Nations which has repackaged its original
U.N. Agenda 21 of 1992 into a steroidal Agenda 2030 that will control the
planet under the same excuse of Sustainable Development, Green Growth/Smart
Growth everything. It is nothing but a redistribution of wealth from the haves
to the have nots. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
Because they have failed
so far to control climate change and wipe out poverty, no matter how many
trillions the western world has distributed to the third world, U.N.
Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon enlisted this time the help of six largest ad
agencies, WPP, Omnicom Group Inc., Publicis Groupe SA, Interpublic Group,
Dentsu, and Havas to promote U.N.’s Sustainable Development program. Funding is
a problem as the developing nations depend largely on donated funds.
The United Nations hopes
that these ad companies will convince their customers around the world to buy
into supporting U.N.’s global objectives even though the citizens of this
country have not been asked to vote on nor approve such economy-destroying goals.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/ad-chiefs-unite-to-support-u-n-sustainable-development-program-1466726404?mod=djemCMOToday
On the tail of Brexit, a
nine-page report has been published by the leaders of Germany, France, and
Italy in Berlin to morph EU from the original free trade between countries
mission into a super state. “Our
countries share a common destiny and a common set of values that give rise to
an even closer union between our citizens. We will therefore strive for a
political union in Europe and invite the next Europeans to participate in this
venture.” http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/683739/EU-referendum-German-French-European-superstate-Brexit
As the population
demographics and the face of Europe are changing fast, it is uncertain that future
Europeans will share a common set of values in a mammoth super state.
Succeeding in this
post-Brexit EU as “super state” compact, will make it much easier to impose
United Nation’s Agenda 2030 onto the globe and thus control everything its
population does.
What does the U.N. really
want to do? According to Tom DeWeese, President of American Policy Center, who
is spearheading an effort to get us out of U.N., believes that “UN is driving to enforce global policies that would:
-
Tax us without representation
and set up a global IRS.
-
Create an
international police force that would threaten the independence and security of
our nation.
-
Create its own
court system with no right to trial by jury of our peers, with a special focus
on prosecuting “right wing extremists” (that means you and me!).
-
Interfere with
our Constitutional form of government through a series of international
treaties.
-
Ram thousands
of ‘refugees” from the hate-America Islamist Third World into our cities and
towns, overriding the objections of American citizens.”
-
It is not the
climate or global warming that the global elitist cabal is interested in, since
nature does not need saving. As Paul
Hellyer, former Canadian Defense Minister, said in a video, “The end game is a
new world order” and you and I are not invited at the table or in the house of
trillions for that matter.
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=8AJa8uM84iI
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=8AJa8uM84iI
Tom DeWeese explained
that, “In a recent interview with a publication called Business Green, the U.N.’s Climate Change Czar, Christiana Figueres
said, ‘I think it is very important to understand that we will only pursue
climate goals through the national pursuit of SDG.”’
SDG refers to Sustainable
Development Goals, the 17 goals outlined in United Nation’s Agenda 2030. She
admits that Agenda 2030 is “U.N.’s ‘ONLY’ policy vehicle to enforce massive
rules and regulations over our nation, our states, our cities, and towns,” all
hidden under the guise of “environmental protection.” https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
Anyone who studied the subject understands that increased solar
flares, decreased solar flares, oceanic currents, and volcanic eruptions have
tremendous effect on weather and climate, not human activity.
Our Secretary of State, John Kerry, said in a candid moment, “If
all the industrial nations went down to zero [carbon dioxide]
emissions, it wouldn’t be enough. Not when more than 65 percent of the
world’s ‘carbon pollution’ comes from the developing world.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAtiygrbTSg
Geoengineering, i.e., “stratospheric aerosol injection,” (SAI),
is seeding the stratosphere with “particles that reflect the sun’s heat in much
the same way volcanic eruptions do.” SAI spraying of the stratosphere has
already been underway. At the same time, chemtrails have been dubbed conspiracy
theories despite visual and physical evidence. SAI is done “to give the global
economy more time to transition from fossil fuels,” said Brennan. “A fully deployed SAI would cost $10 billion
yearly.” Of course, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to
accompany SAIs because, he added, “SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases
from the atmosphere.”
“The technology has the potential to alter the weather patterns
of some regions of the world at the expense of other regions of the world; this
could trigger sharp opposition by some nations.” How much aluminum and other
toxic particles are falling from the chemtrail-seeding in the sky onto our
roads, crops, land, homes, and how adversely are they affecting our health?
John Brennan, CIA Director, disclosed in June 2016 at the
meeting of the Council on Foreign Relations that the technology is here, and seeding
the stratosphere for weather modification to combat global warming is taking
place around the globe. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmQMTfila7I
This massive social engineering of the entire planet will forever alter our way of life, what chemicals fall from the sky, the viability of our crops, water usage, electricity usage, where we live, how much space we occupy, whether we walk or bike to work/school, whether we go anywhere outside of a very small radius, our entire government, and entire societies will be transformed with U.N.’s Agenda 2030.
David Brower, founder of
Friends of the Earth, said, “The goal now is a socialist, redistributionist
society, which is nature’s proper steward and society’s only hope.” Having
experienced this redistributionist socialist/communist society for myself, I
can vehemently disagree with such a statement. Socialism/communism represents
no hope; it is sheer misery and deprivation of everything that makes life worth
living.
No comments:
Post a Comment