“Our Common Agenda”

Environmentalists

United Nations’ Road map to total globalist control, following the morphing of U.N. Agenda 21 (1992) into the U.N. Agenda 2030, has now taken the dangerous road to “Our Common Agenda” as expressed by U.N. Secretary-General, Antonio Guterres. Secretary-General’s report on “Our Common Agenda” (un.org)

The United Nations General Assembly will host a summit in New York on September 22-23, 2024. The organizers are promoting the ‘once-in-a-generation opportunity’ to “strengthen global governance for the sake of present and future generations.” Nobody asked present generations, nor did they get the chance to vote, if they wanted to be ruled by global governance bodies at the United Nations. Event: Summit of the Future | SDG Knowledge Hub | IISD

The invited participants of the Summit of the Future, U.N. member states, “U.N. agencies, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), civil society organizations, academic institutions, the private sector, and youth,” are expected to “forge a new global consensus on what our future should look like.” As we know, a consensus of any kind is just a small group of like-minded and left-leaning people who agree on certain issues and force their consensus onto the masses as if it is what billions of humans wanted.

Nobody bothered to define “civil society organizations” either, but it is obvious that the list of attendees includes mostly leftist organizations and leftist individuals who have no particular interest in learning or accepting what the 8 billion people of this planet want or vote for. The invitees know what is best for the rest of the world and the world must do their bidding or else. Would the population at large be excluded from this “civil society” if they disagree?

At the Summit of the Future, the participant countries and individuals are expected to agree to, promote, and implement the 12 listed commitments which happen to align with most of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) of U.N. Agenda 2030. Common_Agenda_Key_Proposals_English.pdf (un.org)

1.      Leave no one behind:

-          social contract attached to human rights.

-          universal social protection (What kind of protection would that be, and would we be happy about it when we own nothing in order to spread the wealth to others?)

-          basic income security (Who decides what constitutes security for so many different and diverse individuals and families?)

-          universal healthcare for 4 billion “unprotected” (Who exactly will be delivering this universal healthcare, in which hospitals and clinics, and will these 4 billion be screened?)

-          adequate housing, decent work (Who decides what is “adequate” housing and how do they define “decent” work? What are the parameters?)

-          digital inclusivity (Would jail inmates be included? Would white men and Christians be included?)

-          complementary measures to GDP (What exactly are those measures? Theft of wealth and redistribution to the developing world of ‘excess’ GDP?)

2.      Protect our planet, i.e., the global green new deal:

-          1.5-degree Celsius and net-zero emissions by 2050 or sooner

-          declare climate emergency and provide package of support to developing countries.

-          no new coal after 2021 and phasing out fossil fuel subsidies (The logical assumption would be that wind and solar energy subsidies would get larger and larger while land would be taken out of agricultural production to deploy the wind turbines and solar panels.)

-          carbon pricing mechanisms by financial actors (Who are these actors? The same ones receiving wind and solar energy subsidies?)

-          transforming food systems for sustainability (Eat bugs and fake meat?) in nutrition and fairness (Who decides what is fair?)

-          resolve environmental displacement (Open all borders and delete sovereignty?)

3.      Promote peace and prevent conflicts:

-          Place women and girls at the center (Perhaps they will finally define what a woman is.)

-          Application of human rights online (Global control of internet?)

-          Legal identity for all, end statelessness, protection of internally displaced persons, refugees, and migrants (Nobody is illegal anymore and nations will be borderless while former citizenship will become irrelevant.)

-          New visions for the rule of law (No longer the laws of your country but the laws of the global government?)

-          Reshape responses to all forms of violence (A global police and military?)

-          Peaceful, secure, and sustainable use of outer space (Who will control outer space? U.N. stakeholders?)

4.      Abide by international law and ensure justice:

-          Universal access to the Internet as a human right (Who is paying for it and who is controlling it?)

-          Human rights on a more sustainable financial footing (Who is footing the bill and who decides?)

-          Global road map to implement international law (Will each country’s laws then become obsolete?)

5.      Place women and girls at the center:

-          Repeal discriminatory laws (We do not discriminate in the U.S. except against while males now)

-          Promote gender parity through quotas and special measures (Sound like gender-based affirmative action. What special measures? Who will vote for such special measures and what are they?)

 

6.      Build trust:

-          Global code of conduct that promotes integrity in public information (Is this the conduct as implemented by the Chinese scoring system?)

-          Improve people’s experiences with public institutions and basic services.

-          Inclusive national listening and “envisioning the future” exercises (Sounds like communist propagandist oppression. Who does the “envisioning of the future”? NGOs sanctioned by the United Nations? And what is “national listening”?)

-          Action to tackle corruption in line with the United Nations Convention against Corruption

-          Reformed international tax system (Will this international tax system supersede a nation’s tax system, or will it be an additional tax?)

-          Joint structure on financial integrity and tackling illicit financial flows (Who defines what is and what is not “illicit financial flows”?)

 

7.      Improve digital cooperation:

-          Connect all people to the Internet (Who pays? Control of all people, their digital currency, and all assets)

-          Avoid Internet fragmentation (Total control of the Internet in the hands of U.N.?)

-          Protect data (Control of everything and everyone)

-          Apply human rights online (Control of free speech on social platforms)

-          Introduce accountability criteria for discrimination and misleading content (Internet jail and control of people’s thoughts, no more free speech?)

-          Promote regulation of artificial intelligence (That should go over well with the technocracy unless they are in on the U.N. control.)

-          Digital commons as a global public good (Who decides the worth of this global public good, United Nations or the corporatist technocrats, and who opens and shuts the valve of free speech, contravening the U.S. Constitution?)

 

8.      Upgrade the United Nations:

-          Behavioral Science (ESG, environmental social governance, including the Chinese reward/punishment system for good/bad behavior?)

-          High-level Advisory Board led by former Heads of State and Government on improved governance of global public goods.

-          More listening, participation, and consultation (including digitally)

-          Gender parity within the United Nations system by 2028

-          Re-establish the Secretary-General’s Scientific Advisory Board (Bureaucrats from developing nations?)

 

9.      Ensure sustainable financing:

-          Improve the U.N. budget process (Throw more American taxpayer dollars out the window and into the U.N. coffers through various schemes.)

-          Fairer trading system

 

10.   Boost partnerships:

-          U.N. meetings with regional organizations (Watch out if you have been affected by ICLEI, the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, who, with other U.N.-sanctioned NGOs have brought to your cities and towns all sorts of land, agriculture, real estate, and development control.)

-          Stronger engagement between the United Nations system, international financial institutions, and regional development banks (More banking schemes to redistribute wealth from developed nations to developing nations and the United Nations itself.)

-          More systematic engagement with parliaments, subnational authorities and the private sector (Watch out for your local and state representatives who have unwittingly or deliberately brought U.N. rules and NGO partnerships to you, changing what you can and cannot do with your farm, home, yard, property, rivers, ponds, trees, bushes, roads, water collection, water use, building, natural gas, dairy farming, cars, other forms of transportation, hospitals, golf courses, parks, etc.)

 

11.  Listen to and work with the youth:

-          Remove barriers to political participation and measure progress through a “youth in politics” index (This is the same youth living in parents’ basements, preoccupied on Tik Tok with narcissistic selfies and videos.)

 

12.  Be prepared:

-          Strategic Foresight and Global Risk Report by the United Nations every five years

-          Global vaccination plan (They have not injured enough people yet with the Wuhan flu vaccines.)

-          Empowered WHO (What a horrible idea!)

-          Stronger global health security and preparedness (Is that going to include the infamous green vaccination cards to be allowed to travel?)

-          Accelerate product development and access to health technologies in low- and middle-income countries (Americans pay excessive costs for drugs, while the developing world gets them for free or for pennies on the dollar?)

-          Universal health coverage and addressing determinants of health (Who decides? A global health coverage in the Obama style, the Affordable Care Act of 2010, insurance that nobody could really afford except those who receive it for free?)

“Our common future” looks bleak for western civilization, forced to redistribute their hard-earned earnings and wealth to the developing world, to relinquish constitutional freedoms to a global elite that knows what is best for humanity, and to bow to the global governance under the aegis of the United Nations, a developing world bureaucracy lavishly supported by the American taxpayers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Russia’s Veto Saved the Fossil Fuels for Now

In the 1980s, the environmentalists believed that using paper grocery bags harms the environment by excessive deforestation, so they moved in the direction of replacing the paper grocery bags with plastic ones. It made sense, plastic bags made from petroleum by-products were certainly cheaper and more plentiful.

Fast forward to 2021, environmentalist governments in counties like Fairfax, Virginia, moved to replace the plastic bags with paper bags by charging a tax of 5 cents per plastic bag previously given free (included in the price because nothing is free). Furthermore, a fine of $500 will be levied on anyone who dares to leave grass and other yard clippings on curbside in plastic bags other than heavy paper bags.

Fossil fuels have become environmentally and politically such a Democrat hot potato that they have been labeled public enemy number one, including plastics.

What is Fairfax County and other like-minded counties around the nation doing with the 5 cents tax per bag, or 8 cents in other places? Will they fund the bloated Democrat government or their guaranteed basic income schemes? And how is this tax going to solve the manufactured global warming which gave rise to a very lucrative climate change industry and a huge money-maker?

When Amazon and other online retailers run out of places to buy cheap shipping boxes, I wonder which forests are they going to cut down, and can excessive demand for paper and carboard boxes keep up with supply and with tree growth?

The U.N. Security Council moved to vote on December 13, 2021, on a resolution on climate change co-authored by Ireland and Niger, under the guise that adverse climate change can “lead to … social tensions …, exacerbating, prolonging, or contributing to the risk of future conflicts and instability and posing a key risk to global peace, security, and stability.” The concern is that climate change affects more negatively “women, children, ethnic minorities, and the most vulnerable.” Climate Change and Security: Vote on a Resolution*: What's In Blue : Security Council Report

According to the New York Times, “the resolution, which enjoyed wide-ranging support, would have significantly expanded the criteria used by the most powerful U.N. agency to justify intervening in armed conflicts around the world.” Russia Blocks U.N. Move to Treat Climate as Security Threat - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

It is claimed that the U.N. resolution was supported by 100 countries. Twelve of the fifteen Security Council countries signed on, but Russia’s veto blocked its passage. China abstained, and India, with its invited temporary membership status, also declared against the resolution. It is obvious that all three countries have similar interests, the survival of fossil fuels.

The U.S. government has been busy replacing fossil fuels with wind and solar power, doing severe damage to its economy and weakening its position in the world as a superpower. Biden closed the Keystone pipeline on day one and interrupted supply. “Nearly 40% of America’s electricity is produced from natural gas. When gas goes up, so does your electric bill.” Varney on the 'price' of Biden eliminating fossil fuels | Fox Business

The regime stopped giving new drilling permits on federal land and interrupted off-shore drilling. U.S. became again dependent on oil imports.  During President Trump’s administration, America became an oil exporter.

If the U.N. Security Council vote would have been unanimous in favor of the resolution, then members who would fail to take “drastic” measures recommended by “experts” to green their economies immediately, then they would have been considered aggressors against the global governance.

What might have been the expectations to green a country’s economy urgently? To close coal mines, oil derricks, refineries, oil and gas pipelines, and to give up fossil fuels immediately, with huge economic costs and disastrous economic results for that country.

If a country would have refused to comply, then the most intimidating measures against it would have been justifiable, imposing a global dictatorship of the U.N. to save the planet from climate change Armageddon.

So, Russia, China, and India, with one fifth of the world’s land surface and almost half of its population, saved fossil fuels for now. They viewed the manufactured global warming as a political fantasy and the preservation of their economies and of their economic development as most important for their peoples.

The West wants electric cars (they did not do so well recently in one foot of snow stuck for 24 hours on I-95 in Virginia), electric bikes, electric buses, ships, home and business heat and light from solar panels and wind turbines (when the wind blows and the sun shines, otherwise it is cold and dark). China wants coal burning power plants and builds them at high rates. Russia depends on natural gas and pipelines. And India is adding more coal mines.

Biden’s Green New Deal is neither new, nor green, nor a deal, it is a political plan aimed at killing fossil fuels and destroying the American economy that depends on the fossil fuels’ reliability and consistency.

So, the global warming/climate change scheme to enact global governance has been defeated so far. But the grand plan of one world government might still be realized. To achieve it now, the globalists are bringing out the pandemic green passports of Covid vaccination and the social scoring system which is already underway in China and in America.

Restricting movement of the population can be achieved in more ways than just taking away their fossil fuels; the government can cause severe inflation, double gasoline and natural gas prices, make their currency worth less, obstruct the supply chain of necessary goods and food, restrict access to clinics and hospitals, and restrict domestic and international travel. Under draconian Covid-19 lockdown rules, two years after the declared pandemic, Australians cannot travel more than 29 km from home. How Sydney residents can travel more than 5km from home for exercise (msn.com)

Mayor Muriel Bowser of D.C. has already enacted draconian rules that a person must show I.D. and a vaccine card to enter any business in D.C. It is racist to be asked to show I.D. to vote but it is necessary to enter a business.

If you have a green passport, you are not just vaccinated and boostered, but it is proof that you are now a compliant global citizen, and you can be given (by the global government) the privilege to enter buildings, to fly, to travel, to board a ship, to ride a bus, a train, you can use a bank, you can buy or rent a home, you can move from on town to another, and you can attend school. The social scoring system works wonders with population compliance and obedience under the Chinese communist dictatorship.

For now, Russia, China, and India have saved fossil fuels. I am not sure who or what is going to save a weakened America from its Marxist regime in control in Washington. They are busy printing money for trillion-dollar pet social programs and to finance national debt v. GDP which has reached astronomic proportions (127.61% federal and 141.24% total) at the time of this writing. The military is busy hunting down fictional, Democrat-invented systemic racism. U.S. National Debt Clock : Real Time (usdebtclock.org)

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.N. Agenda 21 is Close to Full Implementation

When I first became aware of U.N. Agenda 21, two decades ago, I started reading everything I could find and the more I read, the deeper my searches took me – the large  octopus using the environment as an excuse was stretching its tentacles far and wide across the globe. I could hardly believe it myself as I found long documents, conferences, videos of politicians, presidents, and famous people pushing this globalist agenda and passing executive orders to implement it by fiat at all levels of government.

It was shocking that the whole cabal was there in plain sight, yet people accused us of being conspiracy theorists. Even some conservatives spoke of U.N. Agenda 21 in hushed tones and suggested that the only proper mention of it was in context of property rights, yet it is so much more because it encompasses everything we do in our daily lives and in business. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

The globalists have made such huge strides that they have morphed the initial 1992 U.N. Agenda 21 into U.N. Agenda 2030. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf

The Democrat [Socialist] Party passed it as the Green New Deal, which is neither green, nor new, nor a deal, on the contrary, it is a total control of our personal and economic lives. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-resolution/109/text

Using unelected individuals and NGOs tentacles, U.N. Agenda 21 spread across the world at the local, state, and federal government levels like wildfire in the name of green growth, smart growth, with its lynchpin Sustainable Development (SD) and its seventeen goals.

People were caught unaware and suddenly found out that their private property, way of life, development and business models were fundamentally changed by corrupt politicians beholden to these NGOs who devised, developed, and forced communities to adopt their ideas in urban development, real estate, transportation, family, religion, birth rates, housing, food, wealth redistribution, education, welfare, medical care, construction, technology, fuel use, water use, recreation, zoning, agriculture, and everything else that makes our lives and economy what they are, fundamentally transforming societies to fit their environmentalist ideas and Marxist philosophy.

To sum it all up, over time, while we all slept blissfully because we were a free society, we became wards of the United Nation’s octopus and its third world bureaucrats in alliance with powerful billionaires and technocrats. Worst of all, the U.N. used our own taxpayer dollars to accomplish its nefarious U.N. Agenda 21.

The idea of the globalist “interdependence” can be found in many leftist organizations and environmental charters.

Historian Henry Steele Commager, an alleged definer of modern liberalism in America and a persistent fighter against McCarthyism, drafted an alarming document, “A Declaration of Interdependence,”  which was presented at the World Affairs Council of Philadelphia on October 24, 1975 and then signed on January 30, 1976 at Congress Hall in Philadelphia by several members of Congress and endorsed by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and U.N. agencies. The fact that such a document was signed on our nation’s Bicentennial is even more insulting.

Excerpts are quite shocking:

“Two centuries ago, our forefathers brought forth a new nation; now we must join with others to bring forth a new world order.”

“We affirm that the economy of all nations is a seamless web, and that no one nation can any longer effectively maintain its processes of production and monetary systems without recognizing the necessity for collaborative regulation by international authorities.”

And who might these international authorities be that would control and regulate our monetary systems - United Nations of course and its affiliates. Now we can see more clearly through the precipitous drive to have a cashless economy, supposedly beleaguered by the shortage of coins and dirty paper money and the evolving idea of a one world currency.

U.N. Agenda 21 was one of the documents produced and signed in 1992 at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro by 178 countries. “The Earth Summit produced the Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, the Statement of Forest Principles, and Agenda 21. The Earth Summit also led to the establishment of the Convention of Biological Diversity, and the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.” https://www.encyclopedia.com/environment/energy-government-and-defense-magazines/earth-summit-1992

The David Suzuki’s website states that “The Declaration of Interdependence expresses our values as an organization. It was written for the 1992 U.N. Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, where portions of our declaration were woven into the work of others around the world to form the Earth Charter.” https://davidsuzuki.org/about/declaration-of-interdependence/#:~:text=Declaration%20of%20Interdependence%20The%20Declaration%20of%20Interdependence%20expresses,around%20the%20world%20to%20form%20the%20Earth%20Charter.

The Global Interdependence Center wrote its own Declaration of Interdependence to include among others, the goal to “ESTABLISH A NEW WORLD ORDER of compassion, peace, justice, and security, it is essential that mankind free itself from the limitations of national prejudice, and acknowledge that the forces that unite it are incomparably deeper than those that divide it – that all people are part of one global community, dependent on one body of resources, bound together by the ties of a common humanity and associated in a common adventure on the planet Earth.” https://www.interdependence.org/about/overview-mission/declaration-of-interdependence/

The existence of America as a country is now a “national prejudice” in their view and we must establish a new world order in their Marxist-designed global community for the common good, for the collective.

The Unanimous Declaration of Interdependence was drafted by Cliff Humphrey drawing upon and revising the Declaration of Independence to create in September 1969 what was dubbed as “the founding document of the environmental movement.” Using similar calligraphy and syntax, the one-page paper looked like Thomas Jefferson’s document. http://revolution.berkeley.edu/declaration-of-interdependence/

The National Education Association (NEA) produced in 1976 a social studies curriculum called “A Declaration of Interdependence: Education for a Global Community.” Congresswoman Marjorie Holt (R-MD) described it as “an atrocious betrayal of American independence.” https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED142500.pdf

The first “cardinal premise” of this curriculum as presented on p. 8 of the original document was Global Community explained as “Stressing our relationship as a nation to the other nations of the world and our responsibilities as human beings to the biosphere. Recognizing the concepts of multiethnic, multicultural, and multilingual education in pluralistic societies.” https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED142500.pdf

During our Bicentennial celebration of America, the NEA teachers were preparing the ground of fundamentally transforming our country by seeding students with the idea that they are not Americans, but citizens of the world.  “Education in America's third century will be a process of preparing students to be citizens of the world, a world in which this country forms but a part of the whole.” (p. 20) This is how the NEA was saying Happy Birthday to America. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED142500.pdf

Of the 17 Sustainable Development goals of U.N. Agenda 21, Goal #4 aims to “ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.” https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

Goal #4 is supported by Global Education First Initiative (GEFI). GEFI is focused on “putting quality, relevant and transformative education at the heart of the social, political, and development agendas and generating additional and sufficient funding for education through sustained global advocacy efforts of global movement for education.” https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/211617%20Goals%2017%20Partnerships.pdf

In case you wonder why our country is turning so unpatriotic, anti-American, self-hating, and Marxist, look at America’s brainwashed teachers, the academia, the long history of dumbing down of American children’s education, and the destruction of America by the globalist U.N. Agenda 21 which has been implemented quietly in your neighborhood for the last 28 years. The “dumbing down” of America’s education has been accomplished in less than five decades.