Raspail was considered a racist
and xenophobe and his book a creation for the fringe “white supremacist
circles.” The media screed trashed it non-stop even though the book received
France’s most important literary awards.
Editions Robert Laffont, the
publishing house that owns the original rights to this book, has authorized its
most recent translation.
Why in the world would the mass
media and globalist controllers deem Raspail’s book a racist malignancy and
everyone who reads it a racist? For the simple reason that his fictional book accurately
predicted mass migration and its destruction of western civilization.
Jean Raspail’s imaginary characters, hordes of Indian invaders, are not
so imaginary in twenty-first century Europe. Raspail wrote his book, The
Camp of the Saints, in 1973, half a century before the current mass invasion of
Europe and North America began.
Raspail, unlike Orwell and Huxley, does not present the outcomes of a
dystopian society but the dystopia as it unfolds step by step as the result of “modern
spiritual self-hatred” of western civilization, in this case in France.
The “nihilism of guilt” forces logic-minded scholars to bend over
backwards to avoid the left’s reproaches by turning on their friends and
joining the ranks of the left in condemning Raspail’s book.
Raspail (1925-2020) loved to travel and often mourned the disappearance
of indigenous tribes. He judged New York a “desert” because “we no longer run into
an Algonquin.” His two favorite themes across his 40 books and a dozen novels are
‘literary royalism’ and ‘love for places and peoples distant in time and space.’
Raspail’s offense, as perceived by literary critics and the western
media, was that he dared to write about the fate of the indigenous people of
Europe and whether their fate would be like the peoples who had vanished because
of European colonization. He imagined the “end of European and Western
civilization” when France is invaded by a horde of immigrants from India.
The media sees his third book, The Camp of the Saints, not as a
literary reflection of the death of the West, direct result of the massive immigrant
invasion, but as a racist and xenophobic expression of his imagination.
He describes the “myth of the noble savages” who are vulgar in their “crudeness,
sexual promiscuity, and repellant hygiene.” The migrants are “materially and
culturally destitute” and are looking for a better life, primarily an immediate
“deliverance from poverty and from the often-brutal oppression and inequalities
of non-Western societies.”
The French government becomes paralyzed as they have no idea what to do
with this army of immigrants. Civil society collapses thanks to the do-gooders
who withdraw from public life in the face of the invasion. The immigrants’
lives are not improved at all, so they install their own dictator-generals and
Brahmins in the French government, imposing the very same society they had
fled.
The invaders take over civic functions and French society. Academia
describes “mass immigration as morally required and inevitable,” thus eventually
causing the death of France and of Europe.
Raspail satirizes the “left-liberal Catholicism” which sees Christ in
the invading migrants. Vatican sells its treasures to win the approval of the
Third World while turning their backs on their own flock.
The intellectuals, who prepare the way for the immigrants to land safely,
are assassinated by the army of migrants after the French army deserts. “The
left-wing militias who welcome the migrants are killed or become servants,
peasants, and prostitutes.”
The Camp of the Saints brings to life the leftist view that “The First World
must be taught to be ashamed of itself, to believe that its death will be its
greatest gift to humanity.” The West must submit to the morally superior
non-Western “Other.” And the “Others” turn to violence, destruction, and murder
of the welcoming locals and of those who objected to their landing on Europe’s
shores.

No comments:
Post a Comment