Location in India of gypsy tribes based on genetic research Photo: Wikipedia |
In an effort to combat any ethnic discrimination, the
Romanian government passed H.G. 1194 on December 12, 2001 which established the
“attributes, components, organization, and functioning of the National Council
to Combat Discrimination. The law established heavy penalties for anyone who attacks
someone else on the basis of ethnicity. The main focus of the law was to
prevent the proliferation of anti-Semitism and anti-gypsy sentiments.
Insulting, humiliating, or disadvantaging any ethnic group is strictly forbidden.”
As Mircea Brenciu explained, “The chosen people of the Old
Testament have suffered a genocide unprecedented in the history of humanity; other
tragedies were experienced by Armenians in 1915, by the Nepalese and the
Cambodians under Pol Pot, Ukrainians under Stalin, just to name a few, and
gypsies under all countries.” The memory of such heinous acts must be kept
alive to prevent the historical repetition of such tragedies.
A “semantic confusion” was deliberately created by the
Romanian government under Petre Roman (1990-1991), a “semantic confusion” even promoted
and accepted by the Romanian Academy.
The government decided that the word “gypsy” was really an insult, even
though this terminology existed for hundreds of years, reflecting the
misconception that these tribes were Egyptian; the word “gypsy” had to be
changed to “rom/Romani.” Every other nation continued to call these migratory
groups gypsies. The designation of “rom/Romani” was thus consecrated with great
fanfare in Romania, using the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights as an
excuse.
Modern gypsy Wagon, U.K. Photo: Wikipedia
There are approximately 11 million gypsies worldwide, of
which 8-10 million live in various European countries, making them, for now, one
of the largest minority. David Comas and his research group conducted a study and
published the results in 2012 in Current
Biology, under the title, “Reconstructing
the Population History of European Romani from Genome-wide Data.” This genetic and linguistic analysis of 13 European gypsy groups found
out that their ancestors left north/northwestern India about 1,500 years ago
and settled in the Balkans area approximately 900 years ago. The groups “constitute a mosaic of languages,
religions, and lifestyles while sharing a distinct social heritage.” http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822%2812%2901260-2
The study authors also stated that, the migratory
population, “with moderate gene flow from the Near or Middle East,” showed up
in the Balkans about 900 years ago. This makes it more interesting why Romanians
have decided to rename their gypsies “Romani” or “rom” even though they have
nothing to do in origin with the Romans, the Roman Empire, or the Romanians’
ancestors, the Dacians.
Gypsies/Romani are proud of their heritage, their culture,
their traditions, and their language, which is unlike the Latin-based Romanian
language. But the change of terms from gypsy to “rom” or “Romani” has given
rise to an uncomfortable confusion across European nations whose citizens have
labeled and lumped all Romanians with any and every gypsy/Romani population
across Europe that is “inconveniencing” European non-nomadic society.
According to Mircea Brenciu, Romanian gypsies/Romani give
birth to 5-8 babies, while the birth rate for Romanians in general has been 2-3
children per family and less. It is
surprising that such a nomadic population would have a strong political and
cultural influence in general in Romanian society after 1989. Brenciu calls it
the “Rom-ization” of the Romanian people.
He explained that this “Rom-ization” (“manelizare” in
Romanian language) has the following consequences:
-
No patriotism (gypsies have never been tied to
any lands unless by force)
-
There is no spirit of solidarity (gypsies
express such feelings of solidarity only in cases that serve their interests of
the moment)
-
There is no punctuality and a sense of order
(gypsies are Bohemian, indifferent to history, they are perennial pilgrims)
-
There is no respect for the law (in gypsy
society the law is made by the “stabor” and the “bulibasha,” similar to Muslim
tribes and their Sharia Law)
-
Gypsies build a state within a state, supported
by the force of the occult.
It is hard to have a civilized discussion about issues of
the gypsy/Romani population for fear that the dreaded H.G. 1194 law will
somehow be violated in the dialogue process and the ethnic population offended,
resulting in heavy penalties for the offending party. It does not take much
these days for such an offense to occur, a process not unlike the Political Correctness
of liberalism-gone-amuck in this country which stifles freedom of speech. The
Europeans, of course, have no such guarantees of freedom of speech in their
constitutions.
Brenciu wrote that, during the 18th century,
Empress Maria Theresa is said to have met with other dignitaries to stop the
flow of gypsies from Eastern Europe to the West. This gypsy exodus was inconvenient to western
society because they were not subjects of any jurisdiction. They chose the Baragan
Fields of Wallachia as settlement and built villages such as Tiganesti,
Slobozia, Urziceni, to house by force, with European money, various gypsy groups.
In the meantime, a simple politically correct euphemism, “Rom/Romani,”
invented by progressives. is confusing and obfuscating history by design,
misrepresenting the roots of an entire minority, the gypsies.
No comments:
Post a Comment