Photo: Wikipedia |
The green biomass, including trees and plants, is 99 percent
carbon and water. This carbon comes from atmospheric CO2, including CO2
dissolved in rain water or taken up by the oceans. “Higher atmospheric CO2
dramatically accelerates growth of green biomass above a minimum concentration
of 200 parts per million (0.02%). Below
that concentration (about 50 percent of CO2 level in the air today), it’s
difficult for plants to keep growing.”
The carbon cycle/photosynthesis is a complex bio-energy process
where solar energy is converted into green biomass. Almost all atmospheric CO2
comes from volcanoes, decaying biomass such as forests, oxidized by atmospheric
oxygen, and then from forest fires and the burning of fossil fuels. When fossil
fuels are burned, CO2 is released into the atmosphere and the carbon goes back
into the carbon cycle, forcing the growth of new green biomass. It is a known
fact that greenhouses add CO2 in order to accelerate plant growth. Somehow, the
climate change industry proponents have calculated that the cost of a ton of
carbon dioxide, the gas of plant life, to society is $38.
Solar and wind energy are excellent sources for powering low-power
appliances during emergency conditions and for powering high-power appliances
in remote locations. Marxist environmentalism has been used to advance the
corrupt agenda of “climatism,” escalating in the war on coal which resulted in
expensive electricity, hurting the poor and the middle class.
According to Jonathan
Fahey, quoting a University of Chicago study released in June 23, 2015,
installing new windows, replacing insulation, and making other home efficiency
improvements fell 2.5 times short of the projected energy savings. Because the
study looked at low income homes, a second study surveyed middle-income homes
and the results were similar. http://econresearch.uchicago.edu/content/do-energy-efficiency-investments-deliver-evidence-weatherization-assistance-program
Making older homes more energy-efficient may not be the “cheapest
way to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide.” Weatherizing and cash-for-caulking
may not reduce energy use much either. “Steven Nadel, executive director of the
American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, said that weatherization
programs for low-income households are typically among the least cost-effective
energy efficiency measures.” http://www.azcentral.com/story/money/2015/06/24/study-home-efficiency-upgrades-pay/29233141/
It is very expensive for low income homes to replace
windows, water heaters, and air conditioners when they are still serviceable. Can
you convince homeowners when your data is based on computer models that
exaggerate the energy savings? It is much cheaper to fix a leak or replace a
bulb.
According to the Plumberologist, a Virginia contractor
service, starting in 2015 customers can no longer buy traditional electric
water heaters like those they already own. What is available now is called heat pump
technology. Your new water heaters “will have an AC unit on top that pulls heat
from the air in the room to heat the water rather than producing all the heat
by itself.”
As a former southern resident and owner of an AC heat pump,
I can attest to my ten-year struggle with such an expensive unit that froze in
summer time and never cooled my house adequately, and froze in winter time when
it never warmed my house sufficiently. After ten years of so many repair calls
that I lost count, I finally replaced the monstrosity with a much more
efficient, less expensive, and traditional unit. And there was certainly no
shortage of hot air in the atmosphere year round.
The Plumberologist identified several issues with these new
heat pump water heaters:
-
At 2 feet taller, they may not fit in older
homes or condos where space is an issue
-
The lightest units weigh at least 450 lbs.,
necessitating an extra person to install, doubling the service cost
-
Because heat pump water heaters need several
hundred cubic feet of warm air to work, homeowners will need more than a closet or
small basement space to install one; and, wherever it is installed, “the room
will be as cold as a freezer”
-
Because you are buying now two appliances, a
water heater and air conditioner, “heat
pump heaters are twice as expensive” as the old electric water heater
Why is the EPA making homeowners buy appliances such as this
heat pump water heater we do not need nor can afford, for paltry water heating
efficiency in the months when we aren’t heating our homes, which for Virginians
is about six months a year?
The Plumberologist suggested switching to a gas-powered
water heater – if you can afford it. A tankless gas water heater is “up to 25
times more efficient than the most efficient electric water heater and, the
unit pays for itself in less than 10 years.” http://plumberologist.com/electric-water-heater-replacement/
One way or another we’ll have to pay the EPA piper in order
to reduce CO2 in the atmosphere that supposedly causes manufactured global
warming. My plants are already suffering from the short and cooler summer. At least the EPA will let us have hot water.
I also had an AC heat pump at one point, it was trash! Always breaking down. Because, like you said, it was constantly bloody freezing in winter, not heating, and never cooling enough in summer. It cost me so much in repairs, I was so glad to see the back of that thing. Don't recommend them for any purpose whatsoever.
ReplyDelete