The weatherman at KUSI-TV, John Coleman, the Weather
Channel founder, had told Red Eye host on Fox News a long time ago that he wanted
to sue Al Gore for global warming fraud. He said that “30,000 scientists among
whom 9,000 have Ph.D.’s have signed on to debunk global warming.”
In spite of their efforts, global warming advocates have
marched on, transforming how we obtain and use energy in this country and
around the globe.
Interestingly, scientists from the University of Geneva
will present this month “Laser, Weather, and Climate” at the conference of the
World Meteorological Organization and report on “experiments using lasers to
cause water to condense or ice to form, crucial in accelerating rainfall.”
Cloud “seeding” had been known since 1940s, shooting silver iodide or dry ice
into a cloud, “simulating the natural salt, dust, and other tiny particles in
the atmosphere that help form water drops.” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/article-2403631/Control-weather-shoot-lasers-clouds.html#ixzz2dkCbW9zm
Coleman had hoped that this large group of scientists would
have the opportunity to debate Al Gore and the scientists behind him who have
decided that global warming is real. But Al Gore and his alarmist followers
refused to debate because their “consensus” opinions mixed with carefully manipulated
data had become “settled science” and were thus not open for debate.
Carbon dioxide gas, the necessary gas for plant life, had
been used as a “huge accepted scam,” the cause of global warming. At best,
Coleman said, it may have caused 1/10 of 1 percent degree increase in
temperatures. CO2 is a harmless substance, not a pollutant, it is water vapor.
Discussing the infamous “hockey stick graph,” developed
by Dr. Michael Mann, Coleman stated that it had become the environmentalist
Bible and the cornerstone of global warming, “built on bad science.” “You can put any data in a graph and come up
with a hockey stick.”
When asked what caused the global warming alarmism, Coleman
described it as an “environmentalist religion” which started with World Earth
Day in 1970, followed by the United Nation’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC), an advocacy group, former Vice President Al Gore with his Nobel
Peace Prize, the pliant media, and politicians who could not let a manufactured
crisis go to waste and used it to their advantage. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ
On being asked why he thought global warming was a scam,
Coleman responded that “If you study all the papers of the IPCC on climate
change, if you study everything their scientists have done, it all boils down
to a claim that carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, put there by our
burning of fossil fuels, is going to turn the climate of earth into an oven,
and we all are going to bake and die. That is sheer nonsense, we have been
burning fossil fuels for hundreds of years and we might have raised the
temperature by 1/10 of one degree.”
This past spring, Judith Curry, a professor and
chairperson of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia
Institute of Technology and a weather forecaster, testified on Capitol Hill in
a subcommittee hearing on climate change. “If all other things remain equal, it’s clear that adding
more carbon dioxide to the atmosphere will warm the planet,” she told the
committee. But, do we really have the ability to control all other variables in
the air, in the soil, in the water, volcanoes, and the sun?
Curry continued, “I’ve been trying to understand how there can be such a strong consensus, given these uncertainties.” She said, while humans may be contributing to climate change, we cannot predict how the climate will alter in the future and therefore, there is “no point in trying to reduce emissions.” http://kosu.org/2013/08/uncertain-science-judith-currys-take-on-climate-change/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newsletter_August_30_2013
Curry made news when she published an article in Science
magazine in 2005 warning that hurricanes would grow in intensity as the result
of climate change. http://www.nasa.gov/centers/langley/news/researchernews/rn_aprilcolloquim_prt.htm
Elite globalists like Al Gore and Maurice Strong, who have
pushed the idea of global warming for a long time, actually own the carbon
trading system who is supposed to protect the earth
from CO2 emissions, and are going
to enrich themselves from the cap and trade scheme, taking a percentage of each
transaction.
The oil companies, also global warming proponents, prefer
a different route, imposing a direct CO2 tax. The taxpayers will pay the piper
while the global government elites will fill their coffers, running the whole
green scam. At the end of the day, global warming alarmism is about power to
make money through bogus taxation and control over how the dumbed down masses
live.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/oil-companies-support-global-warming-alarmists-not-skeptics.html
How would the masses have to live? We will have to drive
Smart Cars, walk, bike, take mass transit, do without electricity by giving
utilities the power to cut it off via Smart Grid and Smart Meters if we are
consuming too much. We cannot be trusted to make our own decisions in regards
to consumption. We must be nudged and eventually shoved if we don’t obey.
We are supposed to replace fossil fuels with wind and
solar power. Never mind that the dirty little secret is that solar power needs
a lot of fossil fuel energy as a backup and a lot of land to display the solar
panels. Never mind that wind turbines cannot really generate electricity
without backup from conventional power sources, in spite of the fact that they
turn in the wind.
Dr. Klaus Kaiser explained in his recent article that
wind farms consume quite a bit of energy before they produce any electricity
themselves. A small wind farm with three turbines can use 100 KW – hence the
term “parasitic consumption.” Dr. Kaiser
continued, “Wind turbines need a constant supply of electricity to keep the
gear boxes at the right temperature, to power the system controls, for lighting
and operational purposes, and – in winter – heat the blades in order to prevent
any build-up of ice. These requirements are entirely independent from wind.” http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/57556
At times, some wind farms only produce enough electricity
to heat up a few cups of tea. The
turbines are very expensive to install, operate optimum at certain wind speeds,
kill a lot of birds, and produce an unhealthy and annoying hum that is
affecting human lives and animals negatively.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/windpower/10264185/The-wind-farms-that-generate-enough-power-to-make-a-few-cups-of-tea.html
Denmark generates 20% of its electricity from wind but it
can only use 5% of it safely – it exports 15% to Germany and other neighbors
who have much greater electricity needs than Denmark, in order to avoid
destabilization of the grid. Dr. Kaiser stated that “despite all that ‘free’
electricity from wind, the Danes enjoy the highest electricity costs in the
European Union, approximately double the rate found in most of the other EU
countries…’a terribly expensive disaster,’ said the Chair of Energy Policy in
the Danish Parliament.” Worse yet, the CO2 emissions associated with wind
produced electricity, “produces more CO2 than other energy sources. Denmark’s
CO2 emissions rose well over 30% in the year 2006 alone.”
Wind power is highly variable and thus it requires
conventional power as a backup. When backup power is on standby, the cost of
producing and storing energy is higher. Wind energy is much more expensive, is
not reliable, and is currently subsidized by taxpayers. http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/27170
There is not enough renewable energy to replace
coal-generated, hydro-generated, and nuclear power generated electricity to
satisfy the commercial and private cheap energy needs of the planet’s economy.
According to energycitizens.org, the Renewable Fuel
Standard (RFS) mandated by Congress (set amounts of biofuels blended into
gasoline and Diesel), has affected much of America’s corn crop used by both
humans and livestock feed. Since 2010, weather events and biofuel production
doubled corn prices from $3.50 per bushel to over $7.50.
In order to meet RFS in 2022, Energy Citizen calculated
that more than 40 million acres of land must be used instead of growing food or
livestock feed. “One study estimates that almost 80 percent of current U.S.
farmland will have to be devoted to raising corn to satisfy RFS biofuel
mandates.”
Advocating for relaxing such draconian RFS mandates,
energycitizen.org wrote that a “16-gallon tank of gas contains ethanol made
from enough corn to feed 22 people for a day.” U.S. produced 13.95 million
gallons of ethanol in 2011, enough to feed 570 million people for a year.
In August 2013, Christine Metcalfe, a “community councilor”
from Scotland, won a landmark legal victory for ordinary citizens, halting the
U.K. government’s “unlawful and unpopular wind energy initiative, stopping all
British wind farm development until public approval is granted. The European
Union and the U.K. were found to have violated citizens’ rights, protected
under United Nations’ Aarhus Convention.
Germany recently announced that it will not follow “smart meter
guidance from the European Union” because it would be too costly for consumers. EU’s $700 billion plan for a “smart” Europe
had recommended that 80 percent of homes install smart meters by 2020. Germany
had commissioned a study by Ernst and Young and their report showed that
installation costs for users with low power consumption would experience higher
installation costs than the savings derived from smart meter use. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-08-01/germany-rejects-eu-smart-meter-recommendations-on-cost-concerns.html
Germany has 48 million traditional meters and utilities
are itching to replace them. A switch to
smart meters would have to be coordinated with the recent change in energy
generation away from nuclear power and towards renewables, slated to be 80
percent of consumption by 2050.
Americans are beginning to wake up and fight the
installation of Smart Meters. They are a threat to our health, an intrusion
into our privacy without a warrant, and a spying device. Such ‘smart’ meters
cause escalating utilities bills in spite of household reduction in
consumption.
“Hundreds of local governments have passed moratoriums
and other ordinances to prevent utilities from mandating installation.” A
rising tide of awareness has forced utilities to offer opt-out to citizens in a
dozen states, although most utilities charge an additional fee, “cited by
rights groups as extortive.”
Josh Del Sol, a
Canadian Director, produced a documentary with donations from concerned
citizens, “Take Back Your Power,” available at http://www.takebackyourpower.net
starting September 5. The documentary is a “great collection of first-hand
footage, never-before-seen interviews and eye-witness accounts of the problems
that have turned so-called ‘smart’ meters and the ‘smart’ grid into a
widespread controversy involving the energy utility industry and governments.”
We are making progress debunking global warming/climate
change policies and interests of the global government cabal but they are far
ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment