Protesters
claim that tar sands, fracking, fossil fuels, and especially “dirty” coal are
the enemy of ordinary Americans while the same Americans are fed up with paying
unnecessary high prices for gasoline and electricity when our country has such
vast resources of oil and natural gas that are not being tapped.
I
wonder if Europeans knew in 1300-1850 that their Little Ice Age was caused by
human activity since global warming alarmists were not around to inform them
and force them to change their planet-altering life-style.
In
the Blitzkrieg of constant manufactured crises, the media machine is deflecting
people’s attention from the real issues affecting our country. Everyone is
overwhelmed by a never-ending string of real and imagined catastrophic
occurrences. Citizens seem to have lost the ability to judge for themselves and
discern truth from fiction.
Bombarded
by a deluge of MSM propaganda, low information Americans believed that the
passengers suffering inconveniences caused by a disabled cruise ship that had lost
its power for five days was akin to hurricane Katrina suffering. Can we have a
reality check?
If
power outage disabled such a large ship, have irrational lefties asked
themselves what would happen to a major city if a massive electricity shortage
caused the power to go out for days, weeks, and months? Would solar panels and
wind mills restore electricity, clean water, sanitation, sewage disposal, heat,
A/C, and normalcy to the city? How many people would die from pestilence alone?
The
environmentalists demand that the “evil” coal-powered plants be shut down, and
many have been shut down, because coal destroys the planet. A large portion of
our electricity does come from “dirty” coal. Beloved hybrids and electric cars need
fossil fuels and electricity generated by coal, hydro, and nuclear power
plants, another industry that progressives want shut down.
Then
there is the filthy little secret of solar-generated energy. It may be cleaner
than coal-generated energy, however, in the production process, solar panel
manufacturers create millions of pounds of contaminated water and toxic sludge
which must be transported and disposed of hundreds of miles away.
The
hazardous waste disposal costs (transportation via rail or trucks which burn fossil
fuels) is not included or calculated in the solar panels carbon footprint. The polluted
sludge is shipped because new solar panel manufacturers have not built
facilities to recycle part of the sludge and to dispose of the carcinogenic
cadmium properly.
Dustin
Mulvaney, an “environmental studies
professor who conducts carbon footprint analyses of solar, biofuel and natural
gas production,” calculated that shipping 6.2 million pounds of waste by
eighteen wheelers from California to a site 1,800 miles away would add 5
percent in carbon footprint.
Jason
Dearen of the Associated Press compiled a list of 41 California manufacturers
of solar panels and reported that no such data exists at the federal level.
“The state records show the 17 companies, which had
44 manufacturing facilities in California, produced 46.5 million pounds of
sludge and contaminated water from 2007 through the first half of 2011. Roughly
97 percent of it was taken to hazardous waste facilities throughout the state,
but more than 1.4 million pounds were transported to nine other states:
Arkansas, Minnesota, Nebraska, Rhode Island, Nevada, Washington, Utah, New
Mexico and Arizona.” (Jason Dearen)
Does
creating 100 Megawatt of energy to power 100,000 homes (as the now bankrupt
Solyndra did) balance out the 12.5 million pounds of hazardous waste that could
seep into our drinking water? Yet Mulvaney said that coal-fired plants and
natural gas plants create more than ten times the hazardous waste created by a
solar panel. (http://news.yahoo.com/solar-industry-grapples-hazardous-wastes-184714679.html)
One
problem not addressed in calculations is the fact that solar panels need
thousands of acres of land to display them, land that cannot be used for
agriculture. Wind energy generation is problematic because huge wind mills kill
a lot of birds and the noise pollution created is unbearable and unacceptable in
populated areas when the wind exceeds 30 mph. Wind mills do not create electricity
when idle and need back up from conventional power just like solar panels.
This
brings me back to the war on coal waged by environmentalists and their powerful
lobby. In 2012, the electricity generated from coal was 36% compared to the
previous year of 44.6%, a considerable drop caused by the unprecedented regulatory
assault on coal.
PJM
Interconnection, which operates power for 13 states (Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland,
Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia,
West Virginia and the District of Columbia), held its 2015 capacity auction.
President Obama’s promise that “electricity
prices will necessarily skyrocket” is coming to fruition. According to A.J.
Cameron, “The market-clearing price for new 2015 capacity – almost all natural
gas – was $136 per megawatt,” eight times higher than the 2012 price of $16 per
megawatt. New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and D.C. price is $167 per
megawatt. First Energy’s price in northern Ohio is $357 per megawatt. Ohio has
more forced coal-fired plants shutdowns thus the higher price.
Why are prices so much higher? Andy Ott of
PJM explains, “Capacity prices were higher than last year's because of
retirements of existing coal-fired generation resulting largely from
environmental regulations which go into effect in 2015.”
The Environmental Protection Agency regulators
are winning the war on coal and most Americans are going to suffer, including
the clueless greens.
“The PJM auction forecasts a dim future
where Americans will be paying more to keep the lights on. We are seeing more
and more coal plants fall victim to EPA’s destructive regulatory agenda, and as
a result, we are seeing more job losses and higher electricity prices.” (Ed
Whitfield, House Energy and Power Subcommittee Chairman)
British Petroleum published a report with
projection of long-term energy trends, “Energy Outlook 2030,” in which it predicted
that United States will be 99 percent energy self-sufficient by 2030 due to
shale gas and oil produced by hydraulic fracturing. “It could result
in a re-industrialization of the U.S.” Being more skeptical, I believe that it could
happen if the EPA would lessen its onerous regulatory stronghold on economic
development. http://www.bp.com/extendedsectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9048887&contentId=7082549
“The natural gas boom in America will also lead to a significant reduction in greenhouse gases, since natural gas-fired power plants produce around half as much carbon emissions as coal-fired plants, and just 1 percent as much sulfur oxide.” (Newsmax, February 3, 2013)
As
long as the President is in brilliant campaign mode, he can divorce himself
from reality and pretend he is trying to solve the very problems he has created
by blaming President Bush and the rich and greedy people. He has not solved any
problems but has been quite successful in convincing a majority of Americans
that he has. In the meantime, progressives push renewables and the misery and costly
war on coal continues.
No comments:
Post a Comment