Americans
are beginning to wake up but it is a bit too late. The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is preparing to implement UN Agenda 21 concept of Sustainability
in all of its activities.
ICLEI
has been quietly changing our zoning laws with taxpayer dollar grants. Pliable
and cooperative local “visioning committees” have been working with
international bodies against the U.S. Constitution and the interests of the
local citizens.
Nothing
is produced, serviced, or repaired any more unless it has the word “sustainable”
attached to it. I wonder how we sustained
ourselves for thousands of years before globalists, environmentalists, and
global warming progressives invented themselves?
All
federal agencies deny any connection to UN Agenda 21 and label people who bring
it up as “agenders,” which is a polite way of saying “tin foil/mad hatters.” J.
Gary Lawrence, advisor to President Clinton’s President Council on Sustainable
Development, said in 1998:
“Participating
in a United Nations advocated planning process would very likely bring out many
of the conspiracy-fixated groups and individuals in our society...This segment
of our society who fear ‘one-world government’ and a United Nations invasion of
the United States through which our individual freedom would be stripped away,
would actively work to defeat elected official who joined the ‘conspiracy’ by
undertaking local UN Agenda 21. So we call our process something else, such as
comprehensive planning, growth management, or smart growth.”
I
believe his narrative is called ‘projection.’ He describes well what they are
doing while pretending that it is someone else. I have seen liberals and
bureaucrats engaging in this type of rhetoric in order to malign the other side.
According to Sigmund Freud, projection
is a psychological defense mechanism – a person or group "projects" their
own unsavory thoughts, motivations, desires, and feelings onto another group or
person.
Lisa
Jackson, the EPA administrator, asked in a joint Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA)-National Academy of Sciences (NAS) meeting on November 30, 2010,
to convene a committee of experts to provide EPA with an operational framework
for sustainability that applies across all of the agency’s programs, policies,
and actions. NAS recommended that “EPA
formally adopt as its sustainability paradigm the ‘three pillars’ approach of
‘social, environment, and economic dimensions of sustainability.”
(nationalacademies.org/podcast/20101130.mp3)
The
EPA has adopted “sustainability impact assessments as their basic tool for
issuing draconian regulations.” It is no longer an agency that protects the
environment but an agency to destroy capitalism and take away American
citizens’ property rights, while pushing them further away from access to
wilderness areas.
EPA
Region VI Administrator Al Armendariz compared his agency’s modus operandi to
enforce oil and gas regulations with the Romans crucifying a few enemies in
order to bring about speedy submission.
Nobody
disputes the fact that some basic regulations are necessary in order to protect
the environment from the worst offenders. However, what started as a
well-intentioned program to safeguard our water, air, and soil, has turned into
a green multi-headed, freedom and sovereignty killing monster.
Maurice
Strong, Secretary General of the UN 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, exemplifies how
draconian the sustainable policies of the EPA will be. He told conference
participants in 1992:
“Current
lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class, involving
high meat intake, the use of fossil fuels, electrical appliances, home and
work-place air conditioning, and suburban housing, are not sustainable.”
Plans
are under way to say good-bye to roads, cars, fossil fuels, abundant
electricity, abundant food, inexpensive and easily available medical care and
drugs, private property, access to water supply, and suburban sprawl.
The
Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) has been around for a while, waiting to be
ratified by the United States. United Nations, through its “Agency,” wants to
control mineral and oil exploration, fishing, and passage through oceans and
connected waterways. Because they want control and free sharing of any
proprietary technology, the treaty has not been ratified.
According
to a PJ Media blogger, “Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told an Environmental
Defense Fund reception in Washington that the role of climate change in
national security is one of the environmental considerations that ‘weigh
heavily on the Pentagon.” I thought our government’s out of control spending
and borrowing have generated such a huge debt that it is the most important
threat to our national security.
“The
area of climate change has a dramatic impact on national security: rising sea
levels, to severe droughts, to the melting of the polar caps, to more frequent
and devastating natural disasters, all raise demand for humanitarian assistance
and disaster relief. I was pointing out the other day that with the polar cap
melting, we now have problems with regard to who claims the area in the polar
region. And very frankly, one of the things I hope we get a chance to work on
is to finally get the United States of America to approve the Law of the Sea
Treaty, which has been hanging out there for so long.” (Leon Panetta as
reported by PJ Media Blogger)
I
wonder if he knows that GPS or a compass are very good instruments to determine
coordinates whether the ice melts or stays frozen. Is this an excuse as to why
we have given seven Alaskan islands with surrounding seabeds rich in oil and
minerals to the Russians, against the vehement protests of Alaskans and the
state?
The
Smart Grid, which turns out to be a potential nightmare in terms of cyber
attacks, solar flares, invasion of privacy, and theft of personal data, has
brought about the installation of millions of Smart Meters across the U.S. and
the globe. People are complaining about adverse health effects, excessive
radiation, increased bills despite lower consumption, and invasion of privacy.
The only winners in this Smart Grid upgrade that promises to connect all the
“patchwork of grids” are the power companies that are being offered huge grants
to make the switch and no longer have to worry about building facilities to
store electricity for excess capacity during peak usage. They have solved the problem
with Smart Meters – they have bribed or forced people to install Smart Meters,
thus controlling the flow of electricity and the temperature in our homes –
when we least expect it, they cut off power.
Citizens
are rebelling and demanding to opt-out in Nevada, California, Oregon, and other
states. Nevada approved a $98.75 one-time opt-out charge and monthly fees of
$7.61-$11.01 to read traditional meters. They call them non-communicating
devices. California Utility Pacific Gas & Electric asked for $270 one-time
charge and California Public Utilities Commission approved $75 opt-out fee and
$10 monthly charge. Oregon Public Utility Commission approved a $254 one-time
opt-out $51 monthly charge for a person to come read the meters. (Jennifer
Robison, Review Journal)
If
we consider the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) which aims to control mineral and
oil exploration in oceans and oceanic passage under the United Nations control
with its “Agency,” the Biosphere land preserves and corridors, population
density controls, rezoning of living areas, moratorium on domestic oil drilling
in the Gulf of Mexico, denial of drilling permits on federal land, huge
government land acquisition for wilderness, control of natural gas resources,
denial of Keystone pipeline, restricted mobility through decreased usage of
fossil fuels as a means of locomotion, and control of ocean fishing, it is
evident that globalists want to control every aspect of our lives.
No comments:
Post a Comment