According to the Phoenix Sun, Cabrera does not speak proficient English and uses an interpreter to communicate, in spite of the fact that she is a graduate of Kofa High School in Yuma.
She
acknowledges her English skills are limited but, in an area where Spanish is
the predominant language, it is not necessary to speak English in order to
serve the population’s interests. This
statement begs the question, who is going to represent the interests of the
American citizens who are here lawfully and do speak English? In addition, why
did she receive a high school diploma from an accredited high school if she
does not speak English?
Social
promotion in our schools on any level is wrong, yet liberal academics have been
pushing this issue for many years, diluting the quality of graduates to the
point that some are unable to read, write, or do simple arithmetic.
“State
law requires elected officials to know English, but Cabrera’s attorneys claim
the law does not define proficiency in the language.” (Phoenix Sun)
A socio-linguist expert, who administered three tests to Cabrera, an English-speaking skills test, a reading skills test, and an English comprehension test, deemed her unable to answer questions in English.
“Cabrera’s
lawyers said the action against their client was politically motivated.”
Whatever the claim, the fact remains that, as a member of the council, she
would be unable to serve her English speaking constituents without the help of
an interpreter. Taxpayer dollars would have to provide her with an interpreter
on a daily basis and such services are expensive.
Liberals
love to defend and hinder assimilation into this country in spite of ample
evidence from the failed and disastrous European model of allowing immigrants
to bring their countries, their customs, and their language with them into self-isolating
ghettoes.
President
Merkel of Germany and President Sarkozy of France have admitted in separate
statements that multiculturalism is a failure in Europe, socially,
economically, and politically, and it is not sustainable. “The hostility of
young minority men toward authority across communities in Europe” has escalated,
the deep-seated antipathy leading to frequent and deadly violence.
Socioeconomic
as well as linguistic integration are necessary for a group to progress and
thrive within the same borders. Expecting the local population to provide
expensive translators to a subculture that refuses to learn the language of the
land is detrimental to both groups, preventing inclusion and economic success.
The
Roman Empire had established Latin as the administrative language of the
conquered lands. They viewed communication as an important ingredient of
economic success and governance. Many tribes reluctantly accepted Latin but
transformed it to suit their native languages and dialects. The result was the
six Latin-based romance languages that are spoken today: French, Italian, Spanish, Romanian,
Portuguese, and Romansh. Romansh is spoken in a particular canton in
Switzerland. Interestingly, although the Roman Empire disappeared in the West
in 476 A.D., scholars across Europe had used Latin for centuries afterwards to
promote writing and learning, while the Catholic Church published documents in
Latin and used it ceremonially.
Alfred
the Great (849-899), the only Anglo-Saxon scholar king that we know could read
and write, was convinced that learning was the key to a better life for all. He
commissioned the translation of instructive books from Latin to English. It is
interesting to note, although English is a Germanic language, 51 percent of its
vocabulary comes from Latin. The Roman Empire disappeared long time ago but its
language lives on.
I
do not know the status of every person who does not speak English in this
country, whether they are here legally or illegally. A significant portion of
the 10.8 million illegal immigrants inside the United States entered with a
valid visa and stayed after their visas expired. A large percentage hides
within enclaves and never learns English, depriving themselves of better social
and economic opportunities.
Furthermore,
the current administration, by suing various states who passed legislation to enforce
immigration laws, is giving the signal that entering the U.S. illegally and
staying indefinitely will not be penalized but rewarded through stealth amnesty.
When our economy will improve, we will see more illegal immigration since
economic need is the primary reason for illegal immigration from Latin America.
A
guest worker program would help establish a respect for the rule of law and
fill the employers’ needs for seasonal workers. The Bracero Program (bracero means strong-arm in Spanish), a series of laws and diplomatic agreements
with Mexico instituted by FDR in1942, worked well until 1964 when it was
canceled.
Visa
programs for temporary or seasonal agricultural workers should be streamlined.
E-Verify system and Self Check to correct errors and issues should be
encouraged.
Amnesty
granted to 3 million illegal immigrants in 1986 made the situation much worse,
encouraging a new wave of illegal immigration. President Reagan admitted the
failure.
If
the economic situation of a country is good, there is no need to migrate
illegally to the U.S. We do not see many Chileans here because their economy is
good compared to other Latin American countries. Thus promoting economic
development and good governance in Latin America would go a long way to stem
illegal immigration.
According
to the Heritage Foundation, the “push-pull effect caused by the combination of
slow economic growth in Latin America and the need for workers in the United
States” is a large contributor to illegal immigration.
No
matter how we view or present the legal and illegal immigration issues, the
facts and statistics show the burden on the U.S. economy:
-
400,000
illegal immigrant women give birth to “anchor-babies” who become automatic U.S.
citizens
-
One
in every four inmates in federal prisons is an illegal immigrant (U.S.
Government Accountability Office)
-
50-60
percent illegal immigrants are high school dropouts (Heritage Foundation)
-
Illegal
immigrants come from Mexico (58 percent), Latin
America (23 percent), Asia, Europe, and Africa (18 percent)
A
controversial proposal to grant illegal immigrant students in-state tuition
passed in twelve states as of July 2011. As this law attempts to improve and
address the education of illegal immigrants, opposing groups highlight the fact
that their parents have broken the law in crossing the border illegally and are
thus not entitled to same rights as American citizens. The controversy is not
likely to diminish, particularly when generations of “anchor-babies” turn
eighteen and demand family integration and full rights as American citizens.
No comments:
Post a Comment