Capturing
the site on my iphone, the typical fare of environmentalism popped up,
presenting Siemens as the leader in “sustainable development,” “green
buildings,” “intelligent buildings,” “smart grid,” “sustainable urban
development,” “sustainable communities,” “environmental care,” and health care.
As
our environment and neighborhoods get “smart,” “sustainable,” and “green” around
us, we seem to become less intelligent, more gullible, and willing to accept
euphemistic schemes of power and control over our lives.
Familiar
with the UN Agenda 21 propaganda and its buzzwords preceded either by
“sustainable” or “green” everything, in the name of saving the planet from
human behavior, a clever and devious attempt to control every facet of human
activity and life, I stopped immediately.
Three
touch screen icons inside the billboard displayed games:
-
Green
Building Challenge
-
Urban
Mobility Challenge- eCar Charging Challenge
The
latest attempt to indoctrinate and propagandize “Green Growth” and demonize
urban sprawl as well as fossil-fuels, stated, “Like most cities around the world,
it’s growing at an incredible rate: But there are already ways it’s becoming
more lasting, livable, and prosperous. See if you can make the city more sustainable.”
My
first thought was, of course, that few of the buildings we have built in modern
times are that lasting. Europeans can name thousands of beautiful structures
that are hundreds of years old. Italians have a couple of Coliseums from the Roman
Empire that have survived many earthquakes and are still standing in Rome and
Verona. They may not look perfect since thieves who had built their marble
palaces and churches had dismantled large chunks over centuries, but they had
endured without clever schemes or protection from the “sustainable” crowd.
The
game, Urban Mobility Challenge, invited the player to put as many people as
possible in public transportation (trains). If the player failed in a timed
period, the streets filled to capacity with cars and he/she lost the game.
Disgusted with the overt and not so subtle propaganda, I stopped playing the
other two games.
A sinking feeling of dread overcame me when I realized the pervasiveness of UN Agenda 21 indoctrination at every level of society without Americans taking much notice. People were passing by the billboard as if it was another advertisement. To them, it was just a nice way to save the planet from the “irrational” behavior of humans who are going to destroy Mother Earth with their daily living if not told by “progressives” what to do in order to rectify it.
By
now, every facet of human life and activity has a “sustainability” or “smart
growth” plan. It must make Maurice Strong and his environmental/”progressive”
fellow travelers from third world nations very happy. In the past fifty years,
they have been feverishly and doggedly, devising, planning, and implementing
thousands of ways to capture the wealth of first nations and re-distribute it
through clever schemes, initiatives, and “programmes” to third world countries.
In spite of writings by “Agenders” like me, domestic and international “progressives”
have been very successful, nearing the completion of their “smart growth” dream
of total control of our lives and resources, thanks to Americans who are asleep
and blissfully uninformed.
I
see more and more evidence of UN Agenda 21 irreversible success. The United
Nations is not the bumbling idiotic organization that Americans believe it to
be. Nobody can escape now being “green” and “sustainable.” It is the
progressives’ religion, “green” is the new Marxism.
How
did we possibly survive for thousands of years in the absence of
“sustainability” agendas, plans, initiatives, and bureaucracies, without
progressives telling us what to do? Apparently, we are doomed unless we do what
the wise UN says.
Here it was, United Nations pushing mass transit, the abandonment of conventional cars, the forced acceptance of electric cars that catch on fire and nobody wants to buy, in a clever electronic touch screen game intended to appeal to the young generation of Americans who are easily brainwashed into compliance, done with the generous advertising dollars of Siemens, a German corporation.
While
on the plane, I was flipping through the glossy passenger magazine. The CEO was
talking about “creating a sustainable future” with Eco-Skies, their commitment
to “reduce the impact on the environment in the air.”
In November 2011, “United operated the first commercial flight in the U.S. powered by biofuel.” While the effort is laudable, the CEO admits that “biofuels need to be both scalable and salable (producible in large quantities at a price comparable to traditional hydrocarbons) to be successful commercially.” “I’m proud of our initial steps to help improve the capabilities of this environmentally friendly fuel source.”
I
wondered about the reduced food supply and the high price of corn that people
around the world had to pay because of shortages created by the use of corn as
biofuel.
The
government is imposing values held dear by “progressives” onto the majority of
Americans such as diet, living quarters, exercise, sex, transportation, Mother
Earth religion, property rights, health care, abortion, land use, and
redefinition of marriage. It is our objections, our resistance, and our
non-compliance with their dictates that outrages “progressives.”
“Do
what we want, there will be no fuss, and we will not try to squash you.”
“Progressives” are the true aggressors in the culture wars and they seem to be
winning. At some point, measures that are more forceful will be used to
override our objections and the will of the people. The gentle persuasion of
now will disappear.
Executive
orders and regulations by non-government organizations will be replaced by
re-interpretations of the law without due process, rule making, orders, and
decrees of public-private partnerships with no opportunity for redress.
No comments:
Post a Comment