Wednesday, August 12, 2015

The Climate Change Industry Changes the Energy Market

Countries and companies around the globe have spent trillions of dollars to stop the Earth from warming and the Earth did not get the message, it responded by cooling.  Not to worry, environmentalists who were blatantly wrong and tried to say that cooling is part of global warming, changed their golden goose agenda to climate change. Even though climate change is real, it is called seasons, critics of the climate change industry, of climatism, have been marginalized under the rubric of global warming heretic deniers.

The United Nations came up with a clever scheme to convince the world that the “Four Horsemen of Environmental Apocalypse, overpopulation, resource depletion, pollution, and climate devastation” will annihilate humanity as we know it. The Club of Rome, premier environmental think-tank, consultants to the United Nations, explained how they succeeded:

“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

According to Dr. Steve Goreham, with the establishment of U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988, “climatism was born and controlling carbon has become a bureaucrat’s dream.”

World’s leaders, politicians, corporations, universities, and NGOs have been captivated by the climate change industry even though the theory of global warming has failed miserably and all the climate models were proven wrong. They declared war on fossil fuels and waged it with a vengeance at the expense of taxpayers and electricity users.

Suddenly using too much energy derived from coal, oil, and natural gas became a sin even though energy is the driver of global prosperity. Environmentalists have decided to deny the same opportunity for prosperity from cheap fossil fuel energy to millions of citizens of third world nations, forcing them instead into expensive solar and wind energy they cannot afford. Hydrocarbons became the black sheep, and billions and billions in subsidies were spent to make room for renewables.

“It's in our interest - and we wouldn't be able to stop it anyway - for the poorer countries, which only are responsible for about 20 percent of the globe's pollution, to develop, but they should develop according to a different path, a different industrial prescription than we did.”  (Michael Oppenheimer on This Week with David Brinkley, 31 May 1992) http://www.princeton.edu/step/people/faculty/michael-oppenheimer/in-the-news/Correcting-Glenn-Beck-.pdf

Environmental NGOs lectured impressionable students that nobody should be drilling at all because fossil fuels destroy the planet, we should pay $10 per gallon like Europe, use renewables and learn to live modestly on solar and wind,  if we can afford them. If we must return to medieval living to save one of God’s creatures, then we should.  It is getting serious when even the oil producers have bought into climatism.

But environmentalists are not all equal. They want electricity to their smart devices that use more power than a refrigerator. They want tents, shoes, sunglasses, caps, and clothes made from hydrocarbons but they are protesting fossil fuels. They want their Priuses and electric cars but have no idea that the electricity to power them comes from hydrocarbons. Some enviro-denizens are Nimby (Not in My Back Yard) when it comes to unsightly wind turbines. Others are Banana (Build Absolutely Nothing Anywhere Near Anything). And yet others are Nope (Not On Planet Earth). There is too much oil, “enough to deep fry the planet.”

Dr. Steve Goreham, Executive Director of the Climate Science Coalition of America, and author of Mad, Mad, Mad World of Climatism, described the collateral damage from the war on hydrocarbons using Europe as an example of an “energy disaster unfolding.” He said, “there are 487 national climate change laws in 66 nations” and they are hurting the economies of those respective countries.

Europe is a basket case of subsidized and mandated renewables that has resulted in higher electricity rates for customers, causing electricity penury among some of the citizens of Germany. Giving renewables output priority, energy from other sources like nuclear, hydropower, and fossil fuels was scaled back.  Germany shut down nuclear power plants and Germany and France banned hydraulic fracturing. The market for electricity and wholesale prices became dependent on the mercy of weather and wind, regardless of demand.

There was a massive installation of solar panels in Germany even though Germany is not exactly the sunshine state.  Spain decided to use Diesel generation for its solar panels because the solar panel electricity was too expensive, 23 cents per kWh. The ugly wind turbines everywhere produced inefficient and undependable electricity.

Dr. Goreham also mentioned that some countries imported wood from Alabama to burn as electricity generator instead of dirty coal. The Green Revolution has been so expensive for Europeans that subsidies were dropping in every area, followed by layoffs in the renewable industry. The wind industry in the U.S. gets 2.3 cents per kWh in tax credit in order to compete.

Even though IPCC said that “burning biomass is carbon neutral,” the reality is that biofuels release as much or more carbon dioxide than coal does. And the trading of carbon on the carbon markets is failing. People can pay all the carbon footprint taxes in the world and it will not make a bit of difference in the actual CO2 in the atmosphere. It will just make the traders and the companies richer.

Dr. Fred Singer, physicist and emeritus professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia, reminded us that the climate change industry does not take into account the CO2 emissions from operation and maintenance of renewables such as how often these devices must be replaced (solar panels, wind turbines, parts, lubricants), and the transmission costs. Wind and solar power does emit CO2 in the construction process, during the mining of the metals used, lubricants, etc.

Even the President blamed the low GDP on cold weather. Perhaps it is time for global warmists turned climatists to be exposed again.

Honest scientists say that we have enough fossil fuels reserves for centuries of use. In the world’s economy renewables should compete without subsidies, we should worry about the Smart Grid’s vulnerability from hackers, solar flares, and EMPs, we should conserve energy wisely, protect nature sensibly, and let the carbon credits scheme go into the trash bin of expensive hustles.

 

 

 

Tuesday, August 11, 2015

Real Science and the Nebulous Consensus Science

Dr. Fred Singer
Professor Emeritus
Several presentations at the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness in Ontario, California, dealt with the issues of anthropogenic global warming promoted by the climate change industry.

Dr. S. Fred Singer, founder of the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP), and Ken Haapala, current president of SEPP, discussed the “National Environment Assessment: Peeling the Speculative Onion.” Haapala spoke of “climate fears and finance” and our government’s limitations on CO2 emissions as a “policy in search of a problem.”

Because the global warming (climate change) predictions have proven inaccurate, the fear of non-existent anthropogenic global warming should be called correctly “projections,” said Haapala. “None of the models have undergone the rigorous scientific testing required for verification and validation.”

Satellite images taken since December 1978 provided the most rigorous and comprehensive data measured in the mid-troposphere. It is where the greenhouse gas effect takes place. According to Haapala, four sets of measurements taken with weather balloons by two independent groups agree closely.  But a weather balloon does not cover the globe “comprehensively” and surface measurements are taken on land when 71 percent of Earth’s surface is covered by oceans.

Haapala said that “there is good agreement between the average of the two sets of satellite measurements and the average of the four sets of weather balloon measurements, but significant disparity between the average of the model runs and the observations. This disparity is increasing over time.” Because model runs are expensive and time consuming, many of the models proposed by climate change promoters have “only one or two runs.”

Haapala used a graph of global mid-tropospheric temperature 5-year averages of Warming Predictions v. the Real World, graph developed by McNider and Christy of the University of Alabama in Huntsville, to illustrate the wide-gap comparison between 102 model runs and observations. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303945704579391611041331266

Dr. Fred Singer proposed re-directing public concern from Global Warming (GW) to Global Cooling (GC), including a drastic shift in current policies, “abandoning all mitigation of the greenhouse (GH) gas carbon dioxide.”

An expert in remote sensing and satellites with a specialty in atmospheric and space physics, founding Director of the U.S. Weather Satellite Service and Vice Chair of the U.S. National Advisory Committee on Oceans and Atmosphere, Dr. Singer is of the opinion that “a near-term cooling is among the major calamities facing the population on our planet – while concern about global warming is entirely misplaced. A Little Ice Age (DOB cooling) may arrive within decades – perhaps even sooner. The end of our warm Holocene inter-glacial is rapidly approaching.” He suggested that there is little time to lose in survival preparations and a paradigm change from global warming (GW) to global cooling (GC) is vital.

DOB (Dansgaard-Oeschger-Bond) warming-cooling cycles are solar-controlled and have periods of approximately 1000-1500 years. The most recent cooling phase of the Little Ice Age ended about 200 years ago. Singer and Avery’s 2007 book, Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years, makes a scientific case for these cycles.

Based on deep-sea sediment cores and ice cores scientists are “reasonably sure” of global cooling while rather shaky on global warming. According to Dr. Fred Singer, Earth has experienced “17 Milankovitch-style glaciations in the past 2 million years, each typically lasting 100,000 years, interrupted by warm ‘inter-glacials,’ typically of around 10,000-year duration. The most recent glaciation ended rather suddenly about 12,000 years ago.” He expects the current warm Holocene to end soon. He believes we “have already entered into the next glaciation” which will be discovered in retrospect.

Dr. Singer believes that Little Ice Ages are not “as severe as the major glaciations,” but “present an important threat to the food supply and to current civilization.” Human survival would be possible in developed nations based on available technology but warfare will become a main threat driven by shortages of food and other essential resources.

Dr. Willie Soon, an astrophysicist who authored The Maunder Minimum and The Variable Sun-Earth Connection, discussed the topic of “How Clean is ‘Clean?’ A Common-Sense Proposal.”  Taking aim at the “half-truth + half-truth must make a whole truth” paradigm, which he called a “lie,” Dr. Soon embarked on describing the imagined environmental consequences of increased levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide levels such as human impact issues regulated by the EPA, an organization that loves to tell people how to live.

“Silencing the people who tell the truth about science cannot stand,” Dr. Soon continued.  Ordinary people do not understand that as an honest scientist, “I do not care where the funding is coming from, I am only interested in the scientific truth,” I want to speed up finding out the truth.

Air pollution should have people dropping dead by now, if you are to believe the global warming alarmists. “Where are the bodies,” he asks? We should drop industrial activity, they say. Showing Beijing as an example of air pollution, the “data is all over the place” measured from 1998 until now.  

If Beijing is so polluted as to kill quickly, Soon said, how do you explain the polluted air levels in a smoking lounge at the airport where nobody really drops dead? Levels of particulate matter (pm 2.5 air quality standards also known as fine particle pollution) are much higher in bars and restaurants in South Korea, for example.

Dr. Soon described how he chased study after study to find out evidence that the $9 billion given to Beijing Olympics Committee to improve air quality (the pm2.5), actually worked. “We know the air quality is bad and people cry when reading the paper in Beijing. What did they do?  Shutting down the factories around to get some clean air. How much did they reduce the emission levels?” He found nothing definitive after a long chase of study after study.

Dr. Soon continued that the data shows, for example, that the air in Delhi or Santiago, Chile is more polluted than Beijing on certain days. Can you control the dust particle concentrations from dust storms in Saudi Arabia, Mongolia, or anyplace there is a desert?  There are serious exaggerations coming from the EPA in regards to sudden death from particulate matter in the air. “There is a lot of politics with no scientific evidence to support the case,” Dr. Soon explained.

“The air is getting cleaner yet more people are suffering from asthma.” Are air pollutants causing the problem, asked Dr. Soon? Is it a health crisis? Yet the EPA refuses to release their science data even during testimony in Congress. Dr. Soon added that the EPA administrator said in essence, “You are going to see only what we want you to see.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJaUO2ZFrX4

Dr. Willie Soon co-authored a paper on “Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide” which concluded that CO2 increases in the 20th and early 21st centuries “have produced no deleterious effects upon Earth’s weather and climate.” Higher CO2 levels have increased “markedly” plant growth.  http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/other/increasedco2effects.html

The Heartland Institute shared through its Science Director, Dr. Jay Lehr, the following environmental truths about climate change:

1.       Climate alarmism is promoted through selective MSM reporting.

2.       Temperatures around the globe have not risen since 1998.

3.       Climate has been changing for eons and it is “neither unusual nor harmful.”

4.       Antarctic ice is growing “far more than Arctic ice is melting.”

5.       “900,000 years of ice core records show continuous 1,500-year warming cycles.”

6.       When Greenland was green in the 13th century, temperatures were seven degrees F warmer.

7.       Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant; it is a necessary gas for plant life just like oxygen is necessary for humans to survive.

8.       CO2 concentration levels have risen historically after, not before warming periods.

9.       “Computer models used to forecast future warming cannot calculate the known past.”

10.   $5 billion is spent annually to prove that man (anthropogenic) caused global warming.

While honest scientists are debating and arguing with incontrovertible facts against the nebulous consensus science fed to the climate change industry which is worth potential trillions, an EPA cleanup crew that was supposed to pump out and decontaminate harmful sludge instead “destabilized a dam of loose rocks lodged in the Gold King Mine near Durango and released it into tiny Cement Creek.” As it flowed into the Animas River, the toxic slurry of arsenic, lead, copper, aluminum, and cadmium reached other tributaries, San Juan and Colorado rivers, and flowed 80-miles from the closed mine site. The Navajo Nation president, Russell Begaye, is planning on suing the EPA. “They are not going to get away with this,” he said. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2015/08/10/navajo-nation-aims-to-sue-epa-over-devastating-mining-spill/

This sad event begs the questions, while the EPA is helping de-develop the U.S. by over-regulating CO2, the gas necessary for plant life, are they responsibly guarding the actual pollution in our soil and water?

 




 

 

Monday, August 10, 2015

Replacing the EPA

“It’s time for the national EPA to go. The path forward is now clear and simple: A five-year transition from a federal government bureaucracy to a Committee of the Whole composed of the 50 state environmental protection agencies.

Jay Lehr, Ph.D.
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2015
To those who say this would fail to adequately protect the public’s health or the environment, I urge you to reflect on the poor job currently being done by EPA, and then to meet some of the men and women staffing state EPA offices and see for yourself the sophistication, commitment, and resources they have to do the job. You will not remain doubters for long.”                 -  Jay Lehr, Ph.D.

 
Dr. Jay Lehr, Science Director at the Heartland Institute, gave a speech at the Doctors for Disaster Preparedness conference in Ontario, California, on the topic of “Replacing the EPA.” The author of more than 500 articles and editor of 30 books captivated the audience with his bold proposal to eliminate and replace the mammoth Environmental Protection Agency with a smaller organization composed of a committee of six individuals chosen from all 50 states. He called his plan “Addition by Subtraction.”

In his opinion, the 15,000 employees based in Washington, D.C. and in regional offices around the country “do not do useful work whatsoever.”  Dr. Lehr names himself the “most competent person on the planet” to write a proposal for the elimination of the EPA, saving the taxpayers $6.2 billion annually and improving the environmental protection” because he is the “only scientist alive that played a major role in establishing the EPA.”

Among the many pieces of legislation Dr. Lehr helped write are included the Water Pollution Control Act (later renamed the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Surface Mining and Reclamation Act, Clear Air Act, Federal  Insecticide, Rodenticide, and Fungicide Act, and Comprehensive  Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (now Superfund).

Dr. Lehr admits in his proposal, “Replacing the Environmental Protection Agency,” that “these acts worked well in protecting the environment and the health of our citizens, with the exception of Superfund, which proved to be too overreaching and wreaked havoc with U.S. business as company operating within the law were fined countless dollars and required to pay huge sums after the fact for clean-up of waste disposal that had been within the law at the time of the activity.” (pp. 1-2)

Viewing his plan as penance, Dr. Lehr found it appropriate and fitting that the person who helped form the EPA (December 2, 1970) should contribute to its dismissal via a plan that took him two years to develop. Dr. Lehr was happy to announce that Governor Scot Walker of Wisconsin, presidential candidate, has adopted this entire EPA replacement plan.

EPA regions of the U.S.
Dr. Lehr served on a panel in 1968 which was tasked by the director of the Bureau of Water Hygiene in the U.S. Department of Health to study the potential to expand the bureau’s oversight into a full environmental protection organization.” The panel succeeded and the EPA was created. He wrote that around 1981 “liberal activist groups recognized EPA could be used to advance their political agenda.”

Referring to England, Lehr quoted Samuel Adams, who wrote on Jan. 20, 1772 in the Boston Gazette, “If the public are bound to yield to obedience to the laws to which they cannot give their approval, they are slaves to those who make such laws and enforce them.”

Unfortunately today, it is not just the EPA, but many other agencies whose unelected officials produce endless regulations, Lehr added. We have an “over-criminalization in this country” because of endless regulations people have no idea exist, rules that Americans “probably break at least once a week.” He continued, “There are now in the federal regulatory handbook, 200 volumes of 80,000 laws, and 300,000 regulations written by various agencies with the EPA number one offender.”

James Madison warned us in the Federalist papers that … “laws should be made by men of their own choosing. If the laws are so voluminous that they cannot be read, or so incoherent that they cannot be understood,” then we have a serious problem.

Dr. Lehr believes that we are subjected today to so many laws that few people can track. “Big Business, Big Government, and Big Special Interests collude to make such laws” that give them advantage over the competition. “We have a warped economy,” Lehr said, “where the rich get richer, with the rest having less opportunity because the big three are gaming the system to gain political influence… They get privilege.”

Enabling the big three who handicap competitors and take full advantage of public subsidies, “EPA is all but a wholly owned subsidiary of liberal activist groups." Its rules account for about half of the nearly $2 trillion a year cost of complying with all national regulations in the U.S.” (Wayne W. Crews, Ten Thousand Commandments, Washington, D.C.:  Competitive Enterprise Institute, 2014)

Calling it a “rogue agency,” Dr. Lehr proposed to replace, not fix the EPA, by systematically dismantling it and replacing it with a Committee of the Whole of the 50 state environmental protection agencies. National EPA could be phased out over five years, said Dr. Lehr. “The Committee of the Whole would determine which regulations are actually mandated in law by Congress and which were established by EPA without congressional approval.” (Replacing the Environmental Protection Agency, Jay Lehr, Ph.D., The Heartland Institute, p. 7)

He proposes that “the EPA research laboratories should be left in place at the national level to answer scientific questions, and even these laboratories must be substantially reorganized.” (Ibid, p. 6)

Specifically, 10 regional offices would be established, cutting back the budget from $8.2 billion to $2 billion a year, and reducing staff from over 15,000 to 300 in the national EPA headquarters in Topeka, Kansas. Of the 300 employees working, there will be six delegate-employees from each of the 50 states.

When asked how he would deal with the potential growth of the new EPA, Dr. Lehr admitted that this detail has not been worked out yet. The chairman of the Committee of the Whole would be elected by the 300 delegate-employees to a three-year term.

The drawdown would be:

-          Year One – all employees would be told of the five-year transition period to allow them time for alternate employment; all 300 new employees would transfer, start working, and decide assignments to various subcommittees

-          Year Two – Offices of Policy, Administration and Resource Management, Enforcement and Compliance Assurance will be relocated from Washington and from regional offices to Topeka

-          Year Three – Offices of Air and Radiation and Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention would transfer to Topeka

-          Year Four – Offices of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, and Offices of Water would be moved to Topeka

-          Year Five – Offices of Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Environmental Information, and the Office of the Administrator would also move to Topeka.

Transition members would be assigned periodically to Washington, D.C. and to regional offices to study the activities of the existing branches. If attrition is high early on, transfer of responsibility may be earlier than planned. Each state would be allocated $20 million to augment the new responsibilities.

Dr. Lehr, as one of the founders of the EPA, believes strongly that his plan can be implemented “efficiently and quickly.”

 

 

 

 

Thursday, August 6, 2015

JPL and Its Spacecraft Exploratory Missions

Photo: Ileana Johnson 2015
On a recent trip to California, I was constantly reminded of what is wrong with California, a state whose economy was so booming decades ago that, had it been a stand-alone state, it would have been the world’s sixth largest economy.  Looking at this state now, ravaged by years and years of Marxist policies, open borders, unchecked illegal immigration, anchor babies, multiculturalism, insane diversity rules, sanctuary cities, multi-lingual school system, illegal voting, tax everything and tax again, and environmentalist-driven water use plans including but not limited to dumping billions of fresh water into the ocean in order to save the Delta smelt while orchards and fields are starved for water and trees and crops have long dried out.

California is more concerned with smoking habits if you take into account expensive signs posted everywhere announcing in big, bold letters to those who can read English, “Warning: Birth Defects – Tobacco smoke is known to the state of California to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm.”

California is so protective of animals and planets, even wolves and planet Earth need lawyers. Earthjustice was offering their services through a beautiful ad at the airport for the traveling endangered wolves culled by indiscriminate killing.

California was the golden state, the sunshine state, but the gold has long run out, the luster is now tarnished, perhaps golden brown on account of all the dead grasses from the three-year drought.

The new Cassini spacecraft JPL lab
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2015
California still does something right, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena.  For over fifty years, JPL‘s robotic missions have explored every planet in our solar system. Today, in addition to monitoring Earth and exploring the solar system, JPL “probes deep space in our galaxy and outward to the greater universe.” Managed by the California Institute of Technology for NASA, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is a federally funded research and development center for domestic as well as international entities.

JPL built many firsts:

-          Mariner 2 in 1962, the first successful interplanetary spacecraft

-          Mariner 9 in 1971, the first spacecraft to orbit another planet (Mars)

-          Voyager 2 in 1979-1989, the first tour of the outer planets

-          Galileo in 1997, the first orbit of Jupiter

-          Cassini in 2004, the first orbit of Saturn

-          Deep Impact in 2005, the first comet impact

-          Voyager 1 in 2013, the first spacecraft to reach interstellar space

Cassini is a cooperative mission of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency, with other hundreds of scientists and engineers from Europe and the U.S.  The spacecraft’s final orbits have been named the Grand Finale.

The orbiter Cassini, the largest interplanetary spacecraft built by NASA was launched on October 15, 1997, from Cape Canaveral in Florida, with a Huygens probe aboard owned by the European Space Agency. In 2017, when the Grand Finale spacecraft falls into Saturn’s atmosphere, it will end twenty years of extraordinary mission of exploring Saturn, its rings, Titan, icy satellites, and the magnetosphere. During the first decade of orbiting, 500 gigabytes of scientific data were beamed to Earth through NASA’s Deep Space Network; Cassini made 200 orbits of Saturn, 132 close flybys of Saturn’s moons and discovered seven new moons.

Top discoveries of Cassini include:

-          Huygens probe onboard Cassini parachuted to Titan, the first such landing on a moon in the outer solar system

-          Icy plumes were found spraying from “tiger stripe” fissures on Enceladus, one of Saturn’s moons

-          The moons on Saturn were active and dynamic – showing how planets and moons form

-          Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, has rain, rivers, lakes, and seas and is surrounded by thick, nitrogen-rich atmosphere, perhaps similar to what Earth’s was like long ago

-          Images of the northern storm of 2010-2011 which covered Saturn for months

-          Radio-wave patterns are not tied to Saturn’s interior rotation

-          Images of vertical structures inside the rings piled more than 2 miles high

-          Titan’s prebiotic chemistry

-          Giant hurricanes at both Saturn’s poles

-          North polar hexagon of Saturn

By the end of its 20-year mission, the new Cassini probe assembled with a much larger antenna will make “detailed maps of Saturn’s gravity and magnetic fields, revealing how the planet is composed on the inside,” how much material is in the rings, and perhaps elucidate the mystery of how fast the interior of the planet is rotating. It will take pictures of rings and clouds and “sample icy ring particles being funneled into the atmosphere by Saturn’s magnetic field.”

JPL also monitors the Earth’s climate through its GRACE-FO (Follow On in 2017) by tracking Earth’s water in motion with more precise measuring instruments than its predecessor GRACE.  Tracking variations in gravity which was assumed to be caused by the movement of water, JPL monitors changes in underground water storage, water stored in lakes and rivers, soil moisture, ice sheets and glaciers, and sea levels caused by adding water to oceans.

NASA's Aquarius spacecraft
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2015
 
As a man-made global warming skeptic, I was interested in the mission of Aquarius. According to JPL’s museum, Aquarius provides data to “improve computer models” to help “researchers better understand our climate.” NASA’s Aquarius takes 300,000 measurements per month “to advance our understanding of ocean salinity’s role in Earth’s water cycle, ocean circulation, and climate.”

The spacecraft assembly area for the new Cassini was exhibiting a huge meringue pie-like spacecraft. The huge room was at the time deserted.

The Science Division of JPL included four areas of research:

-          Understanding our Universe (from the Earth to the Planets and Beyond)

This included theoretical studies, observations, laboratory experiments, data analysis, advanced instrument development focused on current or future NASA missions.

JPL states, “Research areas include studying the causes and effects of climate change on Earth, the origin and nature of planetary bodies, the search for life beyond Earth, and the nature and evolution of the universe – all vital scientific issues being addressed by NASA.”

-          Earth Science

“JPL Earth scientists conduct research to characterize and understand the atmosphere, land, and oceans on our home planet in order to make better predictions of future changes through the use of observations to improve models. Our wide-ranging research topics include studies of the composition of the atmosphere with a focus on greenhouse gases, air quality and ozone; the global water, carbon and energy cycles, including clouds, snow, ice and vegetation; ocean circulation and interactions between oceans, atmosphere and sea ice; and earthquake fault systems, volcanic eruptions, and the composition of Earth’s surface.”

-          Planetary Science

Understanding origins, evolution, structure of planets, satellites, and smaller bodies in the solar system; geology and geophysics of terrestrial planets, particularly Mars, satellites, planetary atmospheres, comets, asteroids, properties of planetary ices, chemistry, astrobiology, search for water beyond Earth; and instrument development for future missions.

-          Astrophysics and Space Sciences

Studying the Sun and its heliosphere, solar wind, formation of stars,  formation of planetary systems, exoplanets, formation, structure, and evolution of our own galaxy, distant galaxies, the Universe; development of instruments to “characterize astrophysical objects including exoplanets, proto-planetary disks, interstellar molecular clouds, distant galaxies, black holes, and the Cosmic Microwave Background, the relic radiation from the Big Bang.”

Mars was explored by twin rovers Spirit and Opportunity which found evidence of long-term water near their landing site in 2004. Sojourner studied rocks, dust, and weather on Mars during its 1997 mission. Opportunity’s mission found that a meteorite had crashed into a 65-foot basin (Eagle Crater) previously covered by a “body of salty water deep enough to splash in.” These Mars rovers ranged in size from a footstool (Sojourner), golf cart (Opportunity and Spirit), and an SUV (Curiosity).

Mariner 10 (1973-1975 missions) visited the scorched Mercury, the closest planet to the sun. The rover found that “some deep craters may contain deposits of water ice hidden from the heat of the Sun.”

According to JPL, “Venus shows what happens when a heavy carbon dioxide atmosphere and thick clouds smother the surface of a volcanic world. The clouds absorb heat from the Sun and from the surface and prevent it from escaping. As a result, a runaway greenhouse suffocates the planet. Volcanic eruptions have built low-level mountains, pancake-shaped domes and ancient rivers of lava.” The Magellan mission and Earth-based radars help draw the map of Venus.

JPL’s satellite Explorer 1 began its survey of Earth in 1958. The only planet that is largely covered by salt water, Earth has only 2.5% fresh water. According to JPL, over two-thirds of this fresh water is frozen in the icecaps of Antarctica and Greenland. “Less than 1% of Earth’s fresh water is accessible for direct human use.”

Earth’s crust, divided into tectonic plates, carries the ocean and land on “their backs” so to speak. Earth is wrapped in an atmosphere made up “almost entirely of nitrogen, a smaller amount of oxygen, and other gases.” It is this combination that supports life on earth.

When reading this quote from JPL, Dr. Klaus Kaiser added, "One of these 'other gases' is carbon dioxide (CO2) on which all life on earth depends!"

JPL tracks through its Jason 1 and Jason 2 the movement of warm waves of water east across the Pacific every few years called El Nino, measuring “the changes in sea surface height to an accuracy of 3.3 centimeters (about 1.3 inches).”

Earth-observation satellites monitor the land, ocean, ice, and atmosphere. It can see, for examples, how the Mississippi River Delta water carries soil to the sea, creating mudflats and marshlands. Same satellites can monitor hurricanes, their size, intensity, wind speeds, and motions. JPL’s orbiting ASTER instrument can show soil erosion to shorelines.

Apollo 17 (1972) took the first ever full view picture of Earth and the first-ever photograph of Earth’s south polar regions taken from space. In 1978 SEASAT “set the stage for today’s ocean-observing satellites.”

A U.S.-French oceanography mission called TOPEX/Poseidon measured “global sea surface height from 1992-2005. It provided data about the heat stored in the ocean, and the speed and direction of the currents.”  This information provided short-term weather and global climate variations. Could this be considered a base-line measurement?

To continue the work of TOPEX/Poseidon, Jason 1 was launched in 2001. This satellite monitors “global ocean circulation, studies interactions between the ocean and atmosphere, improves global climate predictions, and monitors events such as El Nino.”

Launched in 1999, SEAWINDS “senses ripples caused by winds near the ocean’s surface. Knowledge of wind speed and direction helps scientists understand climate and weather patterns, changes in Arctic sea ice and icebergs, and variations in snow and soil moisture levels on land.” (Museum archives)

The most complete high resolution digital topographic database of Earth was mapped by the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) on the 11-day flight aboard the space shuttle Endeavour, the manned-space program that was scrapped by the Obama Administration.

And there is our closest celestial neighbor, the Moon, magnificently desolate and covered in millions of craters created by the impact of asteroids and comets. JPL discovered in recent times that the Moon “holds at least small amounts of water.” Galileo surveyed the moon during its 1992 passing to Jupiter.

Galileo spacecraft
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2015
 
Galileo used a 400-Newton retrorocket to slow it down enough to be captured into orbit. The propulsion system was provided by Germany and built by Messerschmitt-Boelkow-Blohm (MBB).

JPL crashed three Ranger spacecraft into the moon’s surface. Surveyor missions were able to soft-land on the Moon and Surveyor 7 photographed the rim of Tycho Crater. This landing paved the way for humans to land on the Moon, proving that a spacecraft “would not sink into the lunar surface.”

According to JPL archives, the 1969 Apollo 12 lunar landing was made by astronauts within 200 meters (656 feet) of Surveyor 3.

Venus was explored by Magellan from 1989-1994 and was able to map its surface from orbit even though its atmosphere was very thick. Flight controllers tested a maneuver called “aero-braking.”

Our solar system, moving through space at 250 kilometers (155 miles) per second, is part of the Milky Way Galaxy, and was born about 4.6 billion years ago.  The Sun, one of more than 100 billion stars in the Milky Way Galaxy, is orbited by eight major planets, their moons and rings, asteroids, comets, and dwarf planets.

“The Sun gives off energy created by reactions in a nuclear furnace at its core. That power plant supplies virtually all the energy for our solar system. Our star sustains life and affects climate processes on Earth. Violent transfers of matter and energy from the Sun to the Earth, such as solar flares, can disrupt our communications systems and endanger astronauts.” (JPL Museum Archives)

Genesis collected between 2001-2004 samples of the solar wind – a stream of charged particles flowing out from the Sun. It returned them to Earth for analysis in laboratories.”

Comets contain in their nucleus “the oldest material in the solar system.” JPL’s Deep Space 1 spacecraft passed by Comet Borrelly in2001 and sent back interesting photographs of jets forming a coma of dust and gases.  “A comet is a time capsule from the formation of the solar system.” Comet Hale-Bopp wowed millions in 1996-1997 with its “tails of dust and blue plasma stretching across the sky for weeks.” In the year 4385, this comet will come close to the Sun again.

Meteorites collected from Antarctica and around the globe are metal or stone fragments that fall to Earth from asteroids, Earth’s Moon, Mars, or comets.

JPL tracks asteroids, pieces of smaller planetary bodies made of rock.  Most are found in the Asteroid Belt and some have orbits that bring them in close proximity to Earth. They can be a few meters to over 900 kilometers across. The second most massive asteroid is Vesta (530 km across). Most asteroid orbit the Sun in the Asteroid Belt located between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter.

Jupiter is the largest planet in the solar system and is made up of gas and clouds with ammonia crystals and other ices. Jupiter’s strong gravitational pull keeps her moons and rings in check.  Voyager 1 discovered Jupiter’s ring and the volcanoes on it.

Galileo Galilei looked at Saturn through his telescope in early 17th century and declared that Saturn had “ears.” Voyager 1 spacecraft photographed with high resolution this giant planet made of gas. The Hubble Space Telescope took clear photographs that elucidated the mystery of its atmospheric composition. Using data from Cassini’s ultraviolet-sensitive instrument, a colorized version of Saturn’s rings was drawn. Among the many moons embedded in Saturn’s rings, scientists at JPL have studied Enceladus and Titan. Apparently Enceladus’ ice volcanoes spray frozen particles into space through geyser-like vents. Titan has a smog-like atmosphere which it is believed to resemble the “primordial Earth.”

The “ice giant” Uranus shrouded by methane was visited by Voyager 2. Uranus has the coldest atmosphere of all the planets hence his moniker of a frigid world. “Uranus orbits the Sun on its side.”

Voyager 2 visited Neptune in 1989 and its moon Triton, with its “coldest surface in the solar system.” A “cantaloupe terrain” and “geysers that spout dark material from beneath its surface of nitrogen ice” were also discovered. A “near twin to Uranus,” Neptune has an atmosphere composed of hydrogen and helium with traces of methane.

Pluto, a dwarf planet and member of the Kuiper Belt, is a frigid world two-thirds the diameter of Earth’s Moon, with a methane ice surface and a very thin atmosphere. Pluto makes one trip around the Sun in 248 years.

JPL's empty control room
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2015
 
The Space Flight Operations Facility, a National Historic Landmark since 1985, controls dozens of missions. Each team of controllers is responsible for communications to and from their assigned spacecraft via the sensitive antennas of the Deep Space Network. These antennas swivel on their bases and track spacecraft from horizon to horizon, dividing the earth into three sections, both listening and talking to their targets. The largest antennas are 10 stories tall with dishes 230 feet across.

The Space Flight controllers coined a phrase that allows one to say, once I visited the Space Flight Operations Facility, “I’ve been to the center of the Universe.”




 

 

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

Equality, Efficiency, and Dependency

Countries run more efficiently when there is less government intervention. Government certainly has its role in providing a strong military, adequate border defense, police and fire protection, and education.

Unfortunately government intervention in the free market has caused again and again more harm than good. And government has now become a Hydra that we fail to legally slay. Voting in a new government has been discouraging; it is now impossible to rid ourselves of the encroaching octopus with sharped-edged suckers.

Contrary to economic laissez faire, President Bush said in 2008, “I’ve abandoned free market principles to save the free market system.” In other words, because his administration attempted unsuccessfully to reign in the Democrats with their entitlement plans to lend money for homes to people who could not afford them and then disabled regulations that would have checked bank loans and mortgages, he had to prop up the too-big-to-fail bankers whose bankruptcy would have sent painful shockwaves around the world and would have upset the crony capitalists. The taxpayers were forced to the rescue.

The non-stop tirade of the “rich do not pay their fair share” and “you did not build that” began the vilification of small and large businessmen, followed by the marginalization and destruction of the middle class, the very geese that lay the golden eggs. The government nanny must be in total control of every facet of our lives.

Productivity, the industrial revolution, manufacturing are better left to other parts of the world. The new global order dictates that we must now be a service society, government-catering to the “hope and change” new citizens coming from far-flung corners of the illiterate third-world kingdom.

You can’t make a “living wage” at your minimum-wage job? It’s the fault of the rich! You vote for a living, stay on welfare, have out-of-wedlock babies, drop anchor-babies, and keep bringing in the flotsam of the world to replace the millions of babies aborted since Roe v. Wade. Make sure you vote into office the same corrupt politicians that keep you perennially poor under the guise of protection; you are dumb enough after graduating from a Common Core school to believe that it’s the fault of the rich who keep you “down.”

Do you accept any personal responsibility for your boorish behavior, drug use, lack of motivation, poor education, sloth, and lack of job skills? Nanny government tells you it is not your fault; you are entitled to the wealth of the rich. And when the rich run out of money, because socialists always run out of other people’s money, they can fleece the middle class, people who worked hard for a living, got an education, and paid taxes.

Today’s rich pay taxes to support the government and the welfare state.  The rich of long ago, after taxation, even though still wealthy, did not enjoy the comforts that you have in your alleged poverty of today. In the winter of 1695, when the climate change industry did not exist, the wine at the palace of Versailles froze in the fancy goblets at King Louis XIV’s table. Even in the nineteenth century America, the ink froze in the inkwells in winter time, that’s how cold and miserable life was.

The Pennsylvania legislature almost destroyed George Washington’s army quartered at Valley Forge. The government decided to try price controls on commodities that were needed by Washington’s army. No farmer with a large family to support was dumb enough to sell their produce at controlled prices when the British were paying in gold. The army almost starved to death in the winter of 1777-1778. The unwise government price controls brought the army to its knees.

Government does not believe in Adam Smith’s “invisible hand;” there is no such thing as people, by pursuing their own self-interest, are led by an invisible hand to promote the well-being of the community. The government must intervene because they know best.

If government does not dictate every last rule and regulation in great detail, how much and what we can eat, what we can drink, how much salt we can ingest, what doctors we can see, what homes we can live in, what cars we can drive, how much electricity we use, how much water we can have, what crops to plant, we are doomed to failure.

To avoid massive voter fraud, by the time the drive for a national “voter” I.D. becomes reality, we will all be chipped and the government will know where we are at all times, just like dogs and cats.

Government intervention to slay the war on poverty has perpetuated and deepened poverty after spending trillions of dollars. In spite of Affirmative Action programs and other wealth redistribution schemes aimed at destroying social injustice, people are still differently-abled by birth; some like to work more than others; some are risk takers and others are comfortable in their status-quo; some like to work the night shift while others no shift at all, they are happy with government handouts; some like to go to school and learn new things, while others enjoy partying and living it up; some don’t stay  on any job long enough to get work experience; why try if welfare is literally forced upon the sloth and unmotivated; some have inherited wealth that must be confiscated for the common good; others who built an enterprise did not really built that, it just happened by magic, it came via the public roads; and others were just plain lucky and thus does not deserve the fruits of their labor.

Keynesian economists have been telling us for decades that “America has more income inequality than other wealthy nations” and this miscalculated inequality “has been on the rise in the last 25 years.”  But none of these calculations include welfare, free medical care, WIC, and other similar programs. They are strictly looking at income disparities born by many factors connected to lacking personal responsibility, education, and the dissolution of the family.

You can tweak statistics to prove whatever you set out to prove so calculations of this “inequality” does not include the many financial dependency programs currently in place. According to the U.S. Census, there are over “100 million Americans who receive at least one welfare program run by the federal government and it does include Social Security and Medicare.”

Even Keynesian economists admit that policies that redistribute wealth or income reduce the rewards of high income earners, raising the rewards of low-income earners, thus reducing the incentive to earn high income.  We trade economic efficiency for equality and create a nation of dependents who would rather stay home and draw benefits from those who still work.

It is a fact that 70 percent of all government spending involves programs that create government dependence. According to the Congressional Budget Office, 60 percent of all U.S. households get more transfer payments than they pay in taxes.  “Terrence P. Jeffrey calculated that 86 million Americans work full-time in the private sector while 148 million Americans receive benefits from the government.” http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/18-stats-that-prove-that-government-dependence-has-reached-epidemic-levels

Education was for many generations a way out of poverty when the family was intact. But when the family unit was destroyed by a government that stepped in as the daddy for generations of fatherless children, college costs have escalated, and professional jobs were shipped overseas at an alarming rate, it was hard to sell education anymore.  Government and Democrats have advocated spending more money on pre-school programs and on inner-city children but the results were dismal. And the uneducated adults could not be lifted out of poverty; they remained on inter-generational government dole.

We have certainly tried for generations to alleviate poverty through the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which outlawed forms of discrimination in rates of pay and hiring standards and established the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Equal pay for equal work was a daunting if not impossible parameter because we are different in our ability, education, experience, etc.  Affirmative action stepped in with hiring quotas for minorities and females.

The problem was that many who were given this preferential treatment over other hires were really less qualified or not qualified at all. They were expected to learn on the job. Critics argued that numerical quotas and compulsory hiring of unqualified workers was certainly a problem in many professions, including the field of education. Replacing qualified “white males” with “other, less qualified workers” was certainly counterproductive and inefficient. Proponents of quotas countered that it was necessary to redress past wrongs, especially slavery. “Putting more women and members of minority groups into high-paying jobs would certainly make the income distribution more equal,” affirmative action supporters argued.

Today the important economic balance of efficiency over equality is completely discounted by Democrats and their supporters who are arguing for a complete replacement of the free market system with socialism on the ideological belief that everything white men have accomplished has been tinged with racism, bigotry, and inequality and only adopting the Marxist ideology would redress that problem. Certainly these Democrats have not studied the recent case of Venezuela and its economic woes resulting from a full-blown socialist poverty state established by the late Hugo Chavez.

There is a lot to be said about government control from cradle to grave.  A population fully dependent on an omnipotent government is easier to control in a high-rise city dwelling setting than spread out over miles on the land. And when government runs out of other people’s money, it will have to scale back and possibly withdraw the largesse to the generationally dependent.

The free market mechanism is efficient but it does not promote the total equality desired by Marxist supporters. Such equality must be achieved by force, by government fiat, redistributing to the world the “unjust and unearned income and wealth” of billions of enterprising people.  When that is achieved, we will have reached Orwellian utopia.

Lucky for us, total government control works because they know what is best for us – nuclear armament of Iran, our sworn enemy, and a peaceful invasion with illegal immigrants brought from third world nations that will quietly complete the fundamental transformation of our expansionist evil empire into a malleable tin pot dictatorship.

We will be turned into an irrelevant impoverished nation as envisioned by the Washington political elites, a nation ruled by a one-party government that worships primitive cultures and obedient welfare-dependent subjects and favors global economic de-development.

The low information voters and welfare recipients will be satisfied with a minimum, grateful that the “man” sends them a check every month in exchange for nothing. The fact that governments do not produce anything of value seems to escape their understanding and, without the hard labor of many, their undeserved and unearned “entitlements” would not arrive promptly every month.