Did Citizens Vote for the Land Grab?

Citizens across the world have been exposed to the implementation of U.N. Agenda 21 now Agenda 2030 for several decades without recognizing that their local and regional initiatives were not local, but were decided out of the country with the help of ICLEI (International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives) membership of more than 600 cities in America and implemented at the local level by stakeholders associated with the U.N., none of whom lived or owned property in the affected area. ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability

The so-called stakeholders came with a predetermined plan and convinced (or potentially bribed) supervisors to agree to their consensus plans. The ideas were presented as if the citizens had voted and decided upon said plans of development.

Citizens just knew that something was not right when various issues were suddenly dropped on their doorstep, serious issues that were affecting their property rights and the rights to exert control over their lives, homes, and land holdings.

The stakeholder consensus councils are councils that report to a top council (the United Nations) and affect a state, a region, a town, a neighborhood, bypassing elected officials. The main goal is to control business and private citizens by abolishing private property.

Consensus agents work to abolish private property by using the ruse of Sustainable Development to manufacture shortages of natural resources and lands and having control over all human actions.

Control is slowly encroaching everything by propagandizing students in schools and adults in the media, with the goal to construct the same thoughts for all populations.

The concept of Green Growth in everything aims to herd all Americans into highly regimented, dense, high-rise urban communities, not unlike what the communists have done who confiscated the lands, homes, and wealth of all citizens and moved them into blocs of concrete with high-rise apartments. Smart Growth was just another semantic deception on the road to daily government serfdom.

Danish politician Ida Auken authored an essay in 2016, published by the World Economic Forum (WEF), “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.” In this future people do not own cars, houses, appliances, any property, and depend on shared services for their needs.

The stakeholder consensus councils have already decided that citizens are entitled to Green Energy to save the planet from their destructive behavior. But Green Energy is inefficient, expensive, unreliable and composed of wind turbines that chop up millions of birds annually, and solar power panels that are easily destroyed in a hail or by powerful winds, take away agricultural land from producing food, and kill birds in flight who are attracted by the heat flux around the gigantic panels.

 If you’ve never been in the situation where the communist regime cuts off electricity, heat, hot water, and even cold water in the coldest months of winter, then you are probably happy to pay a lot of money to install solar panels on high raise apartments, not realizing that a sunless sky does not produce electricity, or not enough for your needs much less for a very large economy.

If you like to camp, go hiking, exploring, kayaking, white-water rafting, boating, and fishing, you might want to consider the fact that the same U.N. Agenda 21 has implemented the Wildland Project which eliminates human presence entirely from more than 50% of the American landscape.

Wildlands Project, now the Wildlands Network was the brainchild of Dave Foreman of the Earth 1^st. Their website shows the map of the “wild ways” where wolves, bears, and other long-ranging animals are desired to be “reintroduced,” areas where people live, work, and vacation. The Wildlands Project – North Western Research Institute

What happens when the much-maligned CO2, the gas of plant life, is captured in pipes underground, crossing farms and towns, pipes that can break and leak massive amounts of CO2 into the atmosphere?

CO2 is not flammable and toxic in small concentrations. “However, when inhaled in high concentrations and in large quantities, it can cause dizziness, unconsciousness, and in extreme instances, death, due to a decrease in the amount of oxygen available for respiration.”

 

Where would displaced people go? Consensus committees have already decided that sustainable communities are places where people would be better controlled in ‘stack and pack’ high rises. Did citizens have an opportunity to air their dissention over such plans? No, because the plans have already been set and the people are being “told” what is planned for them. Where We Work — Wildlands Network - Biodiversity Conservation + Wildlife Crossings

 

Why is the United Nations interested in eliminating private property around the globe? Because they want to control it for the “common good,” also known as global communism.

 

In compliance with the Biodiversity Treaty, one of the three treaties passed in Rio in 1992, rural landowners are having their property stolen, even though the treaty was not ratified by the U.S. How is it done? Through the Executive Branch of government. This treaty spawned the Wildlands Project. Once fully implemented, more than 50% of U.S. land would be returned to the federal government, “a condition that predates Columbus’s arrival.”

How is land confiscated?

1.     Denying water or grazing rights to farmers and ranchers; limiting their ability to use pesticides and herbicides, thus forcing farmers out of business.

2.     Underground minerals are off-limits for development.

3.     Expanding the definition of a wetland thus prohibiting the development of the land.

4.     Locating an endangered species in the forest and in water.

5.     Direct taking via eminent domain to prevent road building and other construction.

6.     NGOs dedicated to removing existing roads and preventing the construction of new ones.

7.     Creating urban boundaries around a town, preventing development and the establishment of utilities, thus destroying the value of rural lands.

8.     Government declares land as part of a flood plain, forcing homeowners to give up their land.

9.     Land trusts that allow owners to stay and pay less taxes as long as they do not modify the terrain in any way unless the holders of conservation easement contractors on their land approve.

President Obama hurried the land confiscation through his Executive Order 13575 from 2011 which established the White House Rural Council. Every federal agency oversees all the food, fiber, and energy needs for all rural sustainable towns and communities, affecting 16% of the population. https://www.agenda21course.com/lesson-3-wildlands-project/

The question remains to be asked, did citizens vote for the stakeholder consensus councils that are changing their lives and private property ownership fundamentally?

 

 

 

 

Globalist Agenda 21, Now Agenda 2030, Continues Undeterred

President Donald J. Trump issued Executive Order 14199, withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that are contrary to the Interests of the United States. It is a start, just like getting us out of the WHO, but unless President Trump’s Executive Order is translated into law, it can and will be rescinded one day by the next Democrat President. Withdrawing the United States from International Organizations, Conventions, and Treaties that Are Contrary to the Interests of the United States – The White House

To allow sustainable development, the lynchpin of U.N. Agenda 21, into all levels of government, President Clinton issued Executive Order 12852 in 1993. This created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development which made sure that all 17 SDGs (Sustainable Development goals) of U.N. Agenda 21 were implemented into all federal agencies.

If Bill Clinton’s executive order is not overridden, the globalist agenda will continue undeterred, no matter what President Trump’s administration does. Key Events to the Implementation of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development | Agenda 21 Course

If local and state governments do not shut down metropolitan planning organizations, regional planning organization, real estate planning organizations, and area transportation authorities, American taxpayer dollars will be used at the local level to deploy the globalist agenda.

The globalist agenda has been put into operation around the country since President Bush Sr. has signed the United States into U.N. Agenda 21 in 1992 and President Clinton codified it into every federal agency, department, infusing Sustainability into everything every agency does.

In 1996 the President’s Council of Sustainable Development submitted Sustainable America: A New Consensus for Prosperity, Opportunity, and a Healthy Environment. Its objective was to create consensus among the many groups that were attempting to take over the world’s economy using Agenda 21. Key Events to the Implementation of Agenda 21/Sustainable Development | Agenda 21 Course

At the Johannesburg Summit in 2002, Colin Powell said that the U.S. was on board with U.N. Agenda 21. The U.S. Conference of Mayors created in 1997 the Joint Center for Sustainable Development and in 2001 the National Governors Association endorsed Smart Growth.

At that time, the federal government owned 33% of all land in the U.S. while state and local governments owned another 10%. We also know that since then Bill Gates acquired agricultural lands in the U.S and became the largest farm landowner in the U.S., with 275,000 across several states. Why a computer businessperson would buy so much agricultural land is an interesting question. Whoever controls the land, water, and the food supply controls the people. 'Why Are You Buying Up So Much Farmland?' — Bill Gates Owns 275,000 Acres Across the U.S. But Says: 'There Isn't Some Grand Scheme Involved'

In 2011 President Obama signed Executive Order 13575 to create the White House Rural Council and to require every agency in the U.S. to oversee “all food, fiber, and energy needs for all the rural sustainable communities across the U.S., affecting 16% of the United States.”

Since the United Nations adopted in 1974 the idea that in this New International Economic Order the government should control the economy, our freedoms and private properties have been squeezed bit by bit, a death of freedom by a thousand paper cuts.

Then the same United Nations followed in 1976 with the statement that “land cannot be controlled by the individual because land represents wealth and it is a social injustice for it to be owned by the individual.”

In 1987 the Brundtland Commission coined the phrase "sustainable development.” This commission detailed how “to take control of the world’s economies and to redistribute the wealth.”

And the last nail in the coffin of global economic freedom came in 1990 when the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), now known as Local Governments for Sustainable Development, was founded at the World Congress for Local Governments for a Sustainable Future at the U.N. in New York.

Thus, began in earnest everything Sustainable, Green Growth, Smart Growth, smart meters, green energy via wind turbines and solar panels, fifteen-minute cities, walkability, smart education, smart housing, and biking everywhere to save the planet from bogus global warming that has been disproven time and time again by real science, not science ‘consensus.’  Consensus is agreement between like-minded people, not science. agenda 21 key word - UN Documents: Gathering a body of global agreements 

Real Birth Certificates Are Important

Births were recorded for administrative purposes, i.e., population tracking and inheritance rights, as far back as Egypt and Rome, and in Mesopotamia. In ancient Egypt, for example, births were found documented on papyrus as far back as 3000 B.C.

In medieval times, the church kept records of births for property, for inheritance rights, to prove that one exists, and such births were legitimate.

During the 19^th century states began to directly administer the civil records, thus ending the need for a church to keep accurate records.

United Kingdom had compulsory birth records in 1853. The United States began oversight of birth records in 1902 when the Act of Congress established the Bureau of Census. By 1919 all U.S. states kept birth records which became standardized in the 1930s.

Today, a real birth certificate provides proof of identity, citizenship, and legal rights. Social services and healthcare can be accessed with a birth certificate.

Millions of people around the world lack birth certificates and thus cannot be properly vetted as to who they are, where they were born, who their parents were, and what kind of crimes they have committed in the countries where they were born.

Birth certificates have been stolen or forged to hide someone’s true identity, and to use someone else’s identity to commit bank fraud (commercial and personal loans), real estate fraud, inheritance fraud, and other uses such as government benefits, citizenship, and other political gains.

As a volunteer translator, I have seen my share of fake birth certificates, copies of someone else’s identity presented as their own, to obtain a legal state I.D. and/or driver’s license at the local DMV.

It is true that citizens coming from less developed nations or countries torn by civil strife and wars have a much harder time obtaining their birth records or any records at all. Such people cannot be properly vetted and brought into our country as they pose an elevated risk of admitting criminals into our country and taking advantage of our tolerant laws, generous welfare, and legal system.

People born in the U.S. have had their U.S. citizen identities stolen, especially now that AI makes it much easier. Their financial information has been exploited via social security numbers and birth dates; credit cards were stolen and their information sold to other criminals.

In addition to birth certificate fraud, domestic and foreign terrorists have used confidential information to obtain fraudulent employment, asylum, marriage fraud, common types of benefit fraud which allow people to enter or reside in the United States.

Unvetted illegals were brought in by the Democrat government under President Obama and President Biden and inserted into conservative neighborhoods around the country because they made convenient Democrat voters which flipped the voting block at all levels of government to Democrat.

The most glaring and recent example of theft on a large scale is the grand financial fraud in Minnesota of the Somali community which elected Ilhan Omar U.S. Representative, a none too grateful woman who constantly criticizes and trashes America who has been so generous to her.

The Somali stronghold stole billions of dollars with fake day care facilities for children and adults. None of these have any children enrolled. Millions of dollars are alleged to have poured out of the Minneapolis airport each day for two years, sent directly to Somalia and none of it has raised eyebrows.

It has been alleged that Ilhan Omar has changed her official birthdate to coincide with the story she told previously about her becoming a U.S. citizen, making the point that original birth certificates are important. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15446687/Ilhan-Omar-disturbing-questions-citizenship-swirl-Minneapolis.html

Fake birth certificates have allowed Manchurian candidates to gain access to positions of power that they were not entitled to and others to inherit fortunes that were not theirs. Other issues involved countries where people did not register their children’s births or waited too long to do so. War criminals, who lived the lives of good citizens after wars, were eventually caught when their “lost” birth certificates or other documents have resurfaced.

CO2 is the Gas of Plant Life not a Pollutant

CO2 gives life to our planetary flora. One can observe from space that CO2 encircles heavily the Amazon rainforest where the trees are quite thick, hence its nickname, the gas of plant life.

For decades, the United Nations and its environmentalist NGOs mushrooming around the world have pushed both global warming and global cooling, painting different Armageddon pictures that would influence young and old to take drastic steps in their lives.

As people remained suspicious and skeptical of predictions, the U.N. morphed global warming agenda into the climate change agenda when its catastrophic predictions did not pan out. However, one variable remained in place, the gas of plant life, also known as carbon dioxide (CO2). Without it, no trees and plants can survive, and both animals and humans are in serious peril.

The climate change industry has become quite profitable and has managed to brainwash and convince entire generations, adults and children, that CO2 is a dangerous gas and we must do everything in our power to reduce it and even bury it in pipelines across farms in order to save planet Earth from self-destruction allegedly caused by CO2.

Radical climate alarmists, propped up by dishonest scientists on the payroll of the Green Lobby and environmental NGOs, have been successful in engaging in misinformation, sensationalism, climate activism, and fearmongering, presenting climate fiction as climate facts.

The Green Lobby of the climate change industry has been quite powerful and well-funded thanks to taxpayer dollars and the tech industry. The technocrats have silenced the opposition on social platforms by removing posts and adding warning labels of “false and misleading” on factual scientific articles.

To protect the Green Lobby’s fiction of manufactured climate crisis, anyone who does not buy into their fairytale of global warming is labeled a climate denier.

Basing its claim of global warming on U.N.’s climate models, the Green Lobby focuses its work on the fact that people believe the green mantra of “science is settled,’ and few dare to contradict science. Yet science is not settled, it changes continuously. And we cannot depend on computers to accurately describe climate and accurately predict future climate events and temperatures.

Climate models do not’ work because there are too many factors that influence the climate – the sun, solar flares, the earth’s orbital properties, oceanic currents, clouds, especially those of the geoengineering variety, and the soil, water, and air pollution.

The Green Lobby’s simplified equations are manipulated in the direction of a desired outcome. If they want to show that the earth’s temperatures will rise by two degrees in an x number of years, then the appropriate numbers will be input to create that result.

This climate fiction has been taught to our students across the nation for many decades and has driven the Green Lobby’s energy agenda and environmental policies of governments at all levels.

One of the most damaging policies has been to convince the public that CO2 emissions are a pollutant and must be stopped immediately regardless of the economic cost.

The 2.3 pounds of CO2 that each of us exhales daily is not a pollutant. Neither are the billions of pounds of CO2 expelled by terrestrial and marine mammals annually. If viewed from space, a lot of CO2 is visibly clustered around the Amazonian forest because trees need it to photosynthesize nutrients.

In our planet’s history, periods of warmth were correlated with great prosperity and plenty of food while periods of cold are dominated by low crop yields and starvation for both humans and animals.

There is no “social cost of carbon.” There is an actual benefit from more carbon in the air, not less.

Science has found benefits from increased CO2:

1.      Shrinking of deserts and greening of the earth seen clearly on NASA satellite data from 1982 to 2009

2.      Declining of extinctions

3.      Declining of natural disasters (severe weather-related deaths have declined since the early 1900s), according to the Center for Research on Epidemiology of Disasters

4.      Longer growing seasons caused by modest warming.

The only way to stop the Green Lobby’s damaging narrative of the climate change industry is to stop the indoctrination of children in schools about climate alarmism and to restore science-based education to the curriculum. Fearmongering should have no place in the classroom.

 

 

 

Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST), Redistribution of Wealth?

Adopted in 1982, the Law of the Sea Treaty was initially named the Third United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS III) developing a set of detailed rules to control the oceans, replacing the 1958 (UNCLOS I) and 1960 U.N. Conventions on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS II). UNCLOS III was joined by 162 countries.

“Negotiated in the 1970s, the Law of the Sea treaty was influenced by the New International Economic Order, a set of economic principles advanced at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) in the 1970s and 1980s,” calling for redistribution of wealth to the less developed countries.

President Ronald Reagan rejected the treaty in 1982 because it demanded technology and wealth transfer from developed countries to developing nations as well as adopting regulations and laws to control oceanic pollution. Jurisdictional limits on oceans included a 12-mile territorial sea limit and a 200-mile exclusive economic zone limit. The treaty aimed to regulate economic “activity on, over, and beneath the ocean’s surface.”

Despite the many pros and cons of LOST, in March 2004, the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee recommended by unanimous vote that the U.S. sign the treaty.

Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) opposed the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) on several grounds, including the loss of National Sovereignty. According to Sen. Mike Lee, treaties must represent U.S. economic and security interests.

To ratify a treaty, the President needs two-thirds majority vote from the Senate. To this date, LOST has not been ratified.

The rejection of LOST has not affected our economy and navigation rights. Sen. Lee found the loss of National sovereignty and mandatory dispute resolution included in the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) quite troubling.

The International Seabed Authority (“the Authority”) has the power to distribute “international royalties” to developing and landlocked nations. “So hypothetically, a U.S. company that has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in developing clean and safe deep-sea mining machinery would be forced to give a portion of its profits to countries such as Somalia, Sudan, and Cuba – all considered to be developing nations by ‘the Authority.’” (Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah)

Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska, supports the ratification of LOST. He believes that this treaty provides rules to oversee future underwater minerals, gas, oil exploration, and shipping on new water routes opened by receding Arctic icepack. Would, however, the Arctic icepack melt be a constant in the future?

According to Sen. Mark Begich, “The United States is the world’s leading maritime power. Only by ratifying the treaty can it protect freedom of navigation to advance our commercial and national security interests, claim extended continental-shelf areas in the Arctic – an area believed to be twice the size of California – as other nations are already doing, and use its provisions to protect the marine environment, manage fisheries and appoint Americans to help resolve disputes.” (The American Legion Magazine)

The January 2026 issue of The American Legion published another article titled, “Lost at Sea, America’s costly absence from the Law of the Sea Treaty.” The writer of the article, John Norton Moore, a former U.S. Ambassador for the Law of the Sea, pointed out the “critical costs of U.S. non-adherence:

1.      Loss of American deep-seabed mining industry and associated jobs, tax revenues, and scientific and technology knowledge.

2.      Loss of ability for the U.S. to shape environmental and mineral recovery rules.

3.      Death by a Thousand Cuts – he believes China undercuts U.S. navigational freedom for the Navya and Air Force.

4.      Loss of the strongest legal basis against Chinese ‘gray-zone’ challenges of Chinese illegal activities

5.      Difficulty cooperating with our allies who are all part of the treaty.

6.      Uncertainty concerning the status of the U.S. ‘extended continental shelf.’

7.      Inability of the U.S. to effectively participate in the most important oceans institutions

8.      Ignoring the U.S. national security community,” including the environmental community.

According to the Heritage Foundation, innocent passage through an area is already protected under “multiple independent treaties, as well as traditional international maritime law.”  Few countries deny passage to the U.S., given its naval superiority. Under the Law of the Sea Treaty, “intelligence and submarine maneuvers in territorial waters would be restricted and regulated.” It is thus not in the national security interest of the United States to ratify this treaty.

The treaty requires policies that regulate deep-sea mining: it requires rules and regulations to control and prevent marine pollution: and requires the control of corporations who cannot bring lawsuits independently. They must depend on the country of origin to plead their case in front of the United Nations’ agency.

“Some proponents of the treaty believe that it will establish a system of property rights for mineral extraction in deep seabed, making the investment in such ventures more attractive.”

President Reagan objected to the principle of the “Common Heritage of Mankind,” which dictates that marine resources belong to all humanity and cannot be exploited by one nation.

To redistribute the wealth, the UN “Authority” must regulate and exploit mineral resources by asking companies to pay an application fee and to reserve an extra site for the Authority to “utilize its own mining efforts.”

A corporation must also pay an annual fee and up to 7% of its annual profits and share its mining and navigational technology. Mining permits are granted or withheld by the “Authority” which is composed of mostly developing countries. (Heritage Foundation)

“Article 82 of the Convention: “Payments and contributions with respect to the exploitation of the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles.” If the U.S. accedes to UNCLOS, it will be required pursuant to Article 82 to transfer royalties generated on the U.S. continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (nm)—an area known as the “extended continental shelf” (ECS)—to the International Seabed Authority. These royalties will likely total tens or even hundreds of billions of dollars over time. Instead of benefiting the American people, the royalties will be distributed by the Authority to developing and landlocked nations, including some that are corrupt, undemocratic, or even state sponsors of terrorism such as Cuba and Sudan.” https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Groves%20prepared%20testimony%20for%20UNCLOS%20hearing%20(final).pdf

Any kind of maritime dispute, fisheries, environmental protection, navigation, and research, must be resolved under this treaty through mandatory dispute resolution by the UN court or tribunal which limits autonomy. Disputes should be resolved by U.S. courts. (Heritage Foundation)

The GOP has passed a resolution on January 14, 2012, exposing United Nations Agenda 21 as “a comprehensive plan of extreme environmentalism, social engineering, and global political control that was initiated at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED).” 

“According to the United Nations Agenda 21 policy, national sovereignty is deemed a social injustice.” United Nations treaties and programs want to force “social justice” through wealth redistribution from developed nations to third world countries.

The United States’ provisional participation in LOST expired in 1998. Would the ratification of another treaty that has the potential to further chip away at our national sovereignty be a clever idea?

 

Change from Mayberry to Islam-berry

 

I am watching with my husband the seventh season (the color version) of the Andy Griffith Show and we are enjoying it immensely.

Sadly though, sixty years later, only Opie is still alive, and he is 71 years old, older than I am. The lives and characters of the fictional Mayberry were broadcast in 1966 and was meant to represent a small slice of the American way of life in a small North Carolina town which seems to be devoid of black people. Mayberry was meant to be located somewhere not far from Raleigh and Mt. Pilot.

It is amazing how in 60 years the fictional Christian Mayberry has turned into Islam-berry, Somalia-berry, and Hijab-berry in many American cities, counties, and states.

Worship at the Altar of the Third World

During feudal times villagers who lived in poor and tightly knit communities were forced to pay taxes to the lord living in the castle nearby, and abide by his decisions, who aimed to keep them enslaved to him, to his family, and to his properties awarded by the whims of the king. This system of feudalism lasted from the 5^th to the 12^th centuries.

Through an extraordinarily complex process, social, economic, and political, private property obtained through hard work, luck, inheritance, and entrepreneurship gave birth to capitalism. Ever since, academics, communists, United Nations, and billionaire globalists alike have vied to end private property and to destroy capitalism, arguably the most successful form of economic system.

In the 21^st century, western civilization, having evolved across the centuries through many political and economic systems, finds itself under attack.  

The planet, composed of 194 states, 193 of which are United Nations members, Vatican excluded, are experiencing similar developments, the invasion of western civilization countries by underdeveloped nations, all planned initially under the United Nations Agenda 21/2030.

One of U.N.’s associated organizations, The International Organization for Migration (IOM), was formed in 1951 to address population displacement following World War II. The mass repatriation of people forcibly removed from their homelands and those who fled Hitler’s regime was an important mission.

Since then, refugees from war-torn countries have necessitated migration to safe areas and countries previously agreed upon. But in the last 15 years, the migration of non-assimilating Muslims to western countries has intensified while oppressed Christians from Muslim-dominated countries were denied such shelter.

Today, according to its website, IOM, with its 175 member states and 8 observer states, is “a leading intergovernmental organization dedicated to promoting humane and orderly migration for the benefit of migrants and society.”  

No mention is made of the linguistic, cultural, religious, and economic loss of the people invaded by the migrants and the massive cost they must bear to implement IOM’s plan and support their “migrants.”

IOM focuses work on three objectives:

1.     Saving lives and protecting people on the move

2.      Driving solutions to displacement

“IOM endeavors to reduce the risks and impacts of climate change, environmental degradation, conflict and instability for communities affected by or at risk of displacement.”

Since global warming has been proven a hoax and climate has been changing for millennia, there are no provable risks to various populations; conflict and instability have been the hallmark of many countries of centuries.

3.      Facilitating pathways for regular migration (“IOM prioritizes whole-of-government, whole-of-society approaches to safely connect people, goods, services, knowledge and innovation.”) It is hard to understand exactly what this word salad says.

It is safe to say that no Americans, living in small towns and communities who woke up and found that their population has increased massively overnight by illegal aliens dropped in their midst, were consulted whether they agreed to or could afford to house so many illegals, feed them, educate them, and provide their healthcare for free.

The American people need to stop being so polite and demand that criminals and other thieves be thrown out of the country. They need to provide welfare programs for their own citizens instead of invaders from cultures that hate us and are antithetical to our way of life and religious beliefs. These “migrants” invading our country are not loyal or grateful to the people who took them in, are not assimilating, they are building their own culture within our culture. A culture without unity, shared history, and language cannot survive.

It is true that our foreign policy and the wars we started by invading others have resulted in the importation of refugees from that part of the world, or from countries torn by tribal wars.

These refugees never wish to assimilate even though they are treated better than our own citizens. They receive immediate supplemental income, free health care, free education, free childcare, free housing, free Medicaid insurance, and EBT cards for food allowance.

The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is requesting $4.7 billion for 2026 to “assist 41 million people on the move and to reinforce the systems that make migration safe, orderly, and regular.” IOM’s request is made because “people move in search of protection, opportunity and stability, and these needs require sustained, principled support.” (Geneva, 8 December 2025) IOM Launches 2026 Global Appeal to Support 41 Million People on the Move | International Organization for Migration

Americans, who wish to move away from the large cities bankrupting the citizenry with confiscatory taxation, cannot afford to migrate to other areas of their own country. Their taxes go to support more illegals.

Leftists want them here in America but do not want them in their own homes or neighborhoods. The fifty illegals bussed to Martha’s Vineyard only stayed on the island for a few hours before the rich and outraged locals had them removed to other parts.

Americans on the left and Democrats in general, worship at the altar of the third world and advocate for the destruction of their own country.