Showing posts with label one world governance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label one world governance. Show all posts

Saturday, December 31, 2022

Global Warming and Other Fairy Tales

As I contemplate the very cold weather we’ve had recently across the U.S., with temperatures dropping by as much as 50 degree Fahrenheit in one day, during which time in New York and Buffalo people were buried under many feet of snow, some freezing to death, the global warming charade, renamed climate change when nobody was buying the global warming narrative, I wonder why Al Gore and other millionaires and billionaires have not sold their mansions by the ocean yet, or why they are not under the water as they have predicted?

We are warm in our homes thanks to coal miners and pipelines that deliver oil and natural gas to our homes, we are not warm because of solar panels covered in snow and ice and frozen blades of wind turbines.

New Yorkers found out the hard way last week that their electric garbage trucks fitted with snowplows could not run more than four hours and then the electric batteries died. The lithium batteries drained fast in the bitter cold. https://www.technocracy.news/bust-nyc-electric-garbage-trucks-lasted-only-4-hours-in-cold/

Perhaps future scientists will figure out how to harvest and channel the possibility of plentiful and lasting renewable energy for the benefit of all mankind, but right now we need cheap electricity from coal, gasoline, and Diesel to support our large economy and the private use sector. And developing nations need electrification and cheap energy to reach the development levels of the west.

World Governance, proposed and forced on humanity by the New World Order of elite billionaires and their “civil society” useful idiots, has been promoted for the last fifty years by United Nations to the planetary public under different names, U.N. Agenda 21, Smart Cities, Regionalism, Visioning, ICLEI, now renamed Local Governments for Sustainability, Global Warming, Sustainable Development, Climate Change, and the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum, to name just a few. No other ambassadors of the global warming fleecing narratives of fear mongering and guilt are more prominent than the faces of Al Gore and Greta Thunberg. www. https://iclei.org/

Harvey Rubin, former Vice Chair of ICLEI, wrote that in a sustainable world “individual rights must take a back seat to the collective.” I am painfully familiar with this “collective,” having lived under communism for twenty years.

A video dated October 2, 1992 and taken from a C-SPAN archives shows discussions on the U.S. House floor about U.N. Agenda 21 in which both Democrats and Republicans are in favor of conforming fully to the recommendations of U.N. Agenda 21. Nancy Pelosi introduced a bill to follow the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to conform the United States to U.N. Agenda 21, its sustainable community practices, and to follow international law. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=XUBwIJWH7ew#

I became aware of the Sustainable Development insidious slithering around the globe at local and state levels about fourteen years ago. At that time, it was taboo even among conservatives but particularly in the RINO and establishment GOP, to mention U.N. Agenda 21. Those who knew the truth behind the U.N. Agenda 21 elected to call it “property rights.” The plan was to guilt the developed world and even force them by government fiat to transfer as much western wealth to the third world countries heavily represented in all forums of the United Nations.

The upcoming World Economic Forum conference in Davos, Switzerland, will take place on January 16-20, 2023, and will focus on six major themes:

1.      Ukraine shines a light on importance of global cooperation” (I would not call being entangled in a war global cooperation, when innocent people die, people who had no idea why they are being bombarded and their lives destroyed; perhaps better education and health might be a better use of resources toward the goal of global cooperation.)

2.      Three interconnected crises – climate, food, energy” (it is important to point out that the climate has been changing for millennia, it is not man-made, should not be tampered with, and food and energy crises have been created on purpose by government decisions and dictates

3.      Don’t use the “recession” word – unfortunately economic recession is already here across the globe; it is disguised under the euphemisms the radical left is creating to hide the real and very impactful problems

4.      “Preparing for the next pandemic requires ending health disparities” (Dr. Malone believes that this topic is designed with Africa in mind and its low vaccination rates in countries with so much sunshine and Vitamin D.)

“Investing in health systems and regional bodies like Africa CDC and African Medicines Agency must be a key priority,” said Paul Kagame, President of Rwanda. “We have to act in the full expectation that there will be another pandemic.”

5.      “Gender, inequality, and jobs of tomorrow” (The constantly harped upon gender inequality and climate inequality show the worst trends in third world nations, not in the west. The jobs of tomorrow cannot be entirely technology because we cannot eat technology. We must plant crops to eat and there must be enough CO2, the gas of plant life, in the atmosphere for plants and trees to grow. With reduced CO2 and reduced fertilization, as the globalists set stringent goals, driving farmers to bankruptcy, and, without sunshine, we will not be able to have crops and we will starve to death. Bill Gates, in partnership with academia, wants to spray more chemicals into the atmosphere to block out the sun’s “harmful” rays to prevent the unproven “global warming.” Climate has changed for millennia due to solar activity, volcanic activity, and oceanic currents, not human activity.)

6.      “Our future is digital” (obviously pushing digital currency so that governments can most efficiently control populations, income, health, spending, education, housing, travel, car use, taxation, savings, and everything else that makes life worth living, all based on a Chinese model of social credit score)

Since the global warming scam failed for lack of scientific evidence, the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the United Nations are pushing the Fourth Industrial Revolution, following their Great Reset. When this Great Reset is going to be completed, we are not sure, but Klaus Schwab told us in his book, Covid-19: The Great Reset, when it started.  This Fourth Industrial Revolution consists of “the convergence of the physical, digital, and biological worlds.”

Through its WEF’s Project MainStream, the goal is to transition the planet to a “circular economy,” in their vision “effective flows of materials, energy, labor, and new information interact.” Who decides what is effective, how much, based on what criteria, who decides, and where it would “flow” remains to be seen.

They suggest four ways to achieve this “revolution:”

1.      Constant tracking and elimination of CO2 (CO2 is the gas of plant life – greenhouses add CO2 to their buildings to increase plant and tree growth)

2.      “The democratization of information and transparency that comes from digitized assets gives new powers to citizens to hold companies and countries accountable” (Based on what happened around the globe in the last three years, it is a one-sided, leftist stream of information in which governments conceal and twist the truth and control populations; there is no transparency and citizens are powerless to do anything about it.)

3.      “New information flows and increasing transparency can help shift citizen behavior on a large scale, as it becomes the path of least resistance within a new set of business and social norms.” (The lockdowns, giving large businesses, liquor stores the status of essential businesses while denying small businesses, churches, and restaurants the right to stay open, false information, false science, refusal of treatment to sick people with a medicine that worked, and forced inoculations have proven that citizens have no recourse to comply and the governments becomes ever more intrusive, powerful. and controlling.)

As an example, Klaus Schwab uses OPower, “peer comparison to entice people into consuming less electricity.” Utilities have used Smart Meters to cut off power to customers during peak usage to “nudge” people into consumption reduction for higher kWh prices and saving the planet from an imaginary and invented Armageddon.

4.      “Innovative ways and new business and organizational models” to change consumer behavior according to the elitist visioning plans.

They envision self-driving vehicles which require 5G antennas installed every so many feet to make them self-drivable, sharing the economy (your business, home, food, clothes, financial assets, land, savings, and everything else you have acquired through hard work and inherited from your parents and grandparents), higher asset utilization rates, i.e., “capture, reuse, and ‘cycle’ materials when the appropriate time comes.” It is not clear nor explained in the book when this appropriate time comes.

According to Klaus Schwab, the crux of the fourth industrial revolution is the economics of carbon capture and storage which will most definitely result in famine around the world as agriculture cannot thrive without CO2, sunshine, a fertile soil with rotating crops, and fertilizers which are currently also under the globalists’ scrutiny of interdiction. Many European farmers were driven out of business due to new rules and regulations which forbade them the use and availability of fertilizers.

We are already decades into the one world governance’s implementation and U.N. Agenda 21, renamed and re-euphemized as Agenda 2030. Many of its dictates are already implemented at every level of government around the world with the full knowledge of those proposing it and passing it.

Control is already in place in:

1.      Energy production, delivery, distribution, and consumption via Smart Grid, Smart Meters, Renewable/Clean/Green resources, and regional plans

2.      Food growth and production via FDA regulations

3.      Education via Common Core

4.      Water use via irrigation denial in agriculture, destruction of dams and reservoirs

5.      Land ownership and use

6.      Finances via use of digital currency and abolishing cash

7.      De-population via sterilization and eugenics

8.      No borders, no sovereignty

9.      No national language, history, no citizenship just a global citizenship, a multi-cultural hodge-podge

10.  Mobility via city plans to a 5-minute walk/bike to work, school, shopping

11.  Less car use and more rail use

12.  Homestead in high-rise tenements to designate formerly private land for wildlife habitat.

One World Governance requires that every societal decision be based on the environmental impact on global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction. Welcome to 2023!

 

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

The Revenge of the Cradle

“Do not allow America to fall as Europe has fallen.” – Katie Hopkins
The Sunday Times wrote ten years ago that a billionaire’s club had met secretly, at the initiative of Bill Gates, to discuss how their philanthropy could be used to implement “ways of tackling a disastrous environmental, social, and industrial threat” of overpopulation.  Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Michael Bloomberg, Warren Buffet, George Soros and David Rockefeller Jr. were among those in attendance.  (May 24, 2009) http://pbble.com/Times-BillionaireClubInBidToCurbOverpopulation.pdf

Their desires to curb overpopulation [over 7 billion now] met with Third World resistance as they believed that “contraception and female education weakened traditional values.” The focus shifted to the developed world: euthanasia, the destruction of the traditional family unit, and to abortion mills, passing infanticide laws as a “choice” in as many states as possible, even killing a healthy infant a minute before birth. 

The blanketing of global governance deployed against all nations of the planet is easy to grasp when all the variables are fit into their proper place. It is not just about population control and reduction but a well-coordinated and endless attack on history, Constitution, Bill of Rights, liberties, the traditional family, Christianity, biological sex, heterosexuality, and the climate change agenda.

In the European Union (EU), technocrats are already overriding the British government and other defeated government-members within the EU.  As Freenations wrote, the “EU intellectuals are lost in their failed Europe.”http://freenations.net/eu-intellectuals-lost-in-their-failed-europe/

In the United States, NGOs (non-governmental organizations), lobbyists for various wealthy crony capitalists, have taken over our elected government at all levels and have become a strong bureaucratic army staffed by naïve useful idiots who have enabled the deployment of the globalist agenda and thus of their own downfall. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AZYcjVC2rRQ&feature=share#
There is no refuge outside of the U.S. as the wealthy elites have deployed their globalist agenda worldwide, forcing compliance on a malleable and silent population whose thoughts are shaped and controlled by the MSM fake news machine.

In addition to the environmentalists’ attack on human overpopulation, the academic assault and shaming of Caucasians via the manufactured “white privilege,” there is a worshipping of primitive cultures that are suddenly better than any civilization white men have developed across the centuries.

The Chinese have launched the controversial “social credit score” system which allows, for example, a well-behaved citizen to purchase a plane ticket to fly on a trip. If his/her social score is not good enough, he/she may have to take the train.

But, we may not have to worry about flying at all as Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York) and her radical communist and socialist acolytes have proposed a Green New Deal in which flying would become obsolete in 12 years. She must be planning on taking a fast speed train ride to Hawaii.

A set of policy proposals to restructure the U.S. economy in the view of global communism, the Green New Deal is purported to address global warming. This global warming, turned conveniently into the climate change industry, had been thoroughly debunked by hard science that relies on facts rather than on the “consensus” of U.N.’s imperfect computer modeling and manipulated data.

“The data does not matter. We’re not basing our recommendations on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.” (Professor Chris Folland, Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research)

The Green New Deal resolution seeks to eliminate air travel, meat consumption, cow flatulence, the use of fossil fuels, and an end to all emission of CO2, the gas of plant life and the gas exhaled by every living person and animal.

Greenpeace Co-Founder, Patrick Moore, speaking to the New American, was shocked that such an insane document was proposed by radical socialist Democrats elected and seated in the U.S. Congress. Such a proposal would decimate the human and animal population, leaving trees as the only source of heating and cooking. Even animal dung as fuel would be unavailable as humans would eat all animals for food then turn to cannibalism. Millennials would be unable to find food in their health-conscious grocery stores in the high-rise mixed use, not so Smart Cities. Only an occasional cortex would propose “paying people who are unwilling to work” and coming up with half-baked and crazy ideas. https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31465-green-new-deal-would-kill-almost-everyone-warns-greenpeace-co-founder?fbclid=IwAR1L_rYl9K1s2a1U1zu94TwrbHJTTqBgg7C_-_Kf76lZayr8MDUPBMTabXU

If there are any humans left in this global communist scheme, Mastercard and Microsoft proposed a “universally-recognized digital identity.” As Fast Company’s Cale Guthrie Weissman explained, it is a system in which humans would be connected to a universal protocol throughout their lives, i.e., when they vote, get married, drive, get a job, rent or buy a home, fly, a really frightening government-knows-all digital identity. “It’s the kind of a citizen-check system a totalitarian regime could only dream of.”https://www.infowars.com/mastercard-microsoft-to-develop-digital-identity-system/

Dismantling borders that would allow for a huge influx of unvetted invaders from the third world and reducing overpopulation are elitist policies of one world government denizens. United States, with its America-loving President Trump, are still standing in the way of such a one world government.

The demographics in western nations show that the replacement value of the dying population is not being met at all. Caucasian and black women in America and in Western Europe are not having sufficient babies; Planned Parenthood contributes to the lower birthrate through abortions.

The billionaire elites have thus taken the opportunity to change the face of America permanently with the help of U.N., moving massive hordes of other races and inimical ethnicities into the western world to fill the population vacuum through fecundity and the cradle.  

The overpopulation that elitists speak of is certainly not true in the western world. The revenge of the cradle means that the majority white population will disappear by 2040, to be replaced with a population more malleable and more easily controlled through social justice rhetoric and generous welfare.
As the Club of Rome, the premier environmental think-tank, consultants to the United Nations, had stated, “The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

Sunday, September 6, 2015

The Terrifying Tentacles of One World Governance

The late Henry Lamb and Tom DeWeese have been working tirelessly for decades to unravel the thorny and terrifying tentacles of U.N.’s Agenda 21, a soft law signed in 1992 by 178 countries. But the idea of a one world government/order has been around since the turn of the 20th century. It suffices to look at the back of a dollar bill to see the evidence. Featured prominently under the Masonic Pyramid are the Latin words, Novus Ordo Seclorum, the New World Order.

In 1891 Cecil Rhodes, of the Rhodes Scholarship fame, turned his dream, that the entire world should be governed by the British Empire, into the Society of the Elect (The Secret Society), the planting of the global governance seed. When they bought a place to headquarter his organization, it became the Chatham House Gang.

Across the ocean, Col. Edward Mandell House, Woodrow Wilson’s advisor and chief negotiator of the Treaty of Versailles, formed a group of like-minded fellows who called themselves The Inquiry. This group met with the Chatham House Gang in order to establish their two groups into a common effort and goal of globalization. The Chatham House Gang became the Royal Institute for International Affairs and The Inquiry became the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

Two weeks after Pearl Harbor, Roosevelt issued a “Declaration of United Nations, the first time such term was used in an official document. According to Curtis B. Dall, his son-in-law, “… most of his [Roosevelt’s] thoughts, his political ammunition… was carefully manufactured for him in advance by the CFR-One World money group.”

A series of rather transparent and “progressive” events solidified the path to U.N.’s Agenda 21 and one-world governance:

-          In 1961 U.S. introduced a program calling for all nations to transfer their military power to the United Nations.

-          In 1972 the U.N. Conference on the Environment took place in Stockholm, Sweden when the Canadian Maurice Strong became the Director of the newly created U.N. Environment Program.

-          In 1976 the Conference on Human Settlements in Vancouver, British Columbia, created “the first steps toward global governance” with 65 pages on land use in which they declared that “Public control of land use is indispensable.” The recommendations that appeared in this conference’s report are implemented in the U.S. and around the world as Sustainable Development (the lynchpin of U.N. Agenda 21, sustainable communities, and smart/green growth, as mandated by comprehensive land use plans.

-          At the World Commission on the Environment in 1983, Gro Harlem Brundtland, Vice Chair of the World Socialist Party, introduced the term and the definition of Sustainable Development – “Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.” The concept and the definition sound innocuous enough until you start wondering, what are the needs of the present and future generations and who decides them and what is ability? It seemed like collectivism to me.

-          In 1992 the U.N. Conference on Environment and Development attended in Rio, Brazil by the largest crowd in history, 10,000 delegates and 30,000 NGOs, released three documents:

1.       U.N. Agenda 21 (a soft law, not a treaty)

2.       The Convention on Biological Diversity (a treaty)

3.       The Framework Convention on Climate Change (a treaty)

U.S. President George H. W. Bush signed two documents but refused to sign the Convention on Biological Diversity based on proprietary concerns of transfer of technology. All three documents were signed by the remaining 177 participating countries.

Henry Lamb wrote in 2010 that “Government control of land use is a fundamental principle of global governance.” The 40-chapter U.N. Agenda 21 document, although never ratified by Congress, limits the behavior and freedoms of individuals and firms, involving every facet of human life. It makes suggestions and recommendations that are adapted into law at the state and local levels through comprehensive land use plans which are voted on and included by the board of supervisors into local zoning codes.

Citizens do not understand U.N. Agenda 21’s damaging ramifications to their private property, to their ability to make a living, to use their land, grow food in their gardens, sell their fresh produce freely, engage in agriculture, sell their land, and pass it on to future generations. Local land owners do not have the opportunity to provide their input into the decision-making process; they are at the mercy of “visioning committees” and the board of supervisors, often plants or paid subscribers to the one world government idea.

A video dated October 2, 1992 and taken from C-SPAN archives shows discussion on the House floor about Agenda 21 in which both Democrats and Republicans are in favor of conforming fully to the recommendations of U.N. Agenda 21 document in spite of the fact that it was not ratified by Congress and they took an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution and sovereignty of our country. A younger Nancy Pelosi introduced a bill to follow the 1992 Rio Earth Summit to conform to U.N.’s Agenda 21, its local sustainable community practices, and to follow international law. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeDue0vFOQs


-          Population redistribution according to resources (social engineering is taking place now through the flooding of immigrants from third world countries into the western world under the guise of refugee status and diversity)

-          Equitable distribution of resources by government control of land use (taking place under the aegis of many bureaus such as EPA, Bureau of Land Management, Wildlife and Fisheries, Park Service)

-          Zoning and planning controlling land use

-          Public land ownership controlling urban and rural land

-          Population control (massive abortions via government funded clinics that sell the aborted baby body parts and dwindling births in the developed world)

-          Government “Regionalist authorities” hold developing rights

-          Mega-cities with mixed-use, high rise, stack-and-pack miniature apartments with no parking but five-minute walk from work, school, shopping, and entertainment

-          Mass transit and removing people from their cars by making expensive toll roads, narrower roads, taking road out of commission and making them into pedestrian zones only

-          Redraw neighborhoods to make them more diverse as dictated by HUD and insert illegal immigrants into middle class neighborhoods

-          Shaming people into owning land by calling it social injustice; Seattle is drafting rules that will ban single-family zoning; Seattle Mayor Ed Murray said, “We can still be a city for everyone, but only if we give up our outdated ideal of every family living in their own home on a 5,000 square foot lot”

-          Plans to manipulate human populations in rural areas

The one world governance will control and dictate:

-          Energy production, delivery, distribution, and consumption via Smart Grid, Smart Meters, and Renewables (wind and solar)

-          Food growth and production via FDA regulations

-          Education via a curriculum centered on Mother Earth, global communism, and global citizenship (Common Core, International Baccalaureate)

-          Water through irrigation denial to save a tiny fish, forced reduction in home use, recreation activities, destruction of dams and reservoirs

-          Population control to “manageable levels” through sterilization, eugenics (who decides and how?)

-          No borders, no sovereignty

-          No national language and culture, a multi-cultural hodge-podge

-          No Christian faith

-          Longer distance travel through light rail use for the masses while elite continue to fly and lecture the rest of us about limiting our carbon foot-print

-          Mobility restrictions

-          Homestead in high rise apartments in order to designate formerly private land wildlife habitat

Christina Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change delivered a speech to the World Affairs Council of Northern California, touting that the “world has reinvented itself” and in order to be prosperous and efficient, we must live in Mega cities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seDpS2QEoNw

She said, “In order to address climate change is to build a complex framework the purpose of which is to facilitate and accelerate the actions at all different levels of government.”

Business Insider wrote about the plan floating at Davos 2015 to spend $90 trillion to redesign all cities so that people no longer need cars. Coffin-sized living quarters will be stacked by the millions in these Mega cities while the residents attempt to grow food on roofs and terraces and capture rain for all their daily needs. Figueres said, “you will enjoy unlimited interaction and global cooperation,” while buildings will capture as much water needed.”

She listed the benefits of living in such Mega cities as avoiding the catastrophic rise in temperatures (even though the Polar Vortex dumped record amounts of snow and froze half the globe, even Cairo got snow last year), increased food security (from growing food on rooftops and terraces? The world’s grain storage can only last for two days in case of an world-wide catastrophe), increased energy security (from solar panels on the roof and windmills on the roof?), increased water security (from collecting rainwater?), transportation security using electric cars with charge stations (where is the electricity coming from to charge the said cars? Fossil fuels?), low carbon model that contributes to job creation, job security, and happiness (where are all the much-touted green jobs?), and safeguard natural resources for future generations (what future generations, before or after mass starvation?).

In this new world, we will have driverless cars while we are free to shop on iPad, black boxes will be in every car, and humans won’t have to do anything, just be compliant and drone-like, memorizing and regurgitating their education via a global U.N.-approved environmentalist curriculum.

In Mega Cities Figueres sees a “transformed world, each building would produce all electricity that it needs, capture water as needed, produce food on the roof and the terrace.”

Meanwhile most human activity that define our western civilization would be deemed unsustainable: private property, suburban living, fossil fuels, consumerism, farming, irrigation, commercial agriculture, logging, pesticide use, herbicide use, grazing of livestock, paved roads, golf courses, ski lodges, dams, reservoirs, fences, power lines, and the family unit.

Henry Lamb told us that UNESCO, another tentacle of the United Nations, had taught seminars to teachers and disseminated curriculum materials that promoted the idea that nationalism was bad and had to be replaced with global citizenship. The textbooks of the International Baccalaureate plant the seeds of prejudice against national pride and support the idea that global citizenship and one world governance are viable solutions to the future of a socially, racially, and economically unjust planet.

U.N. has developed an environmental constitution for the world called the Draft International Covenant on Environment and Development (DICED). The September 22, 2010 version has 79 articles described in great detail in 242 pages. It takes Sustainable Development principles described in U.N. Agenda 21 and transforms them into global law which supersedes all constitutions, including the U.S. Constitution. All signatory nations would become centrally planned, socialist countries in which all decisions would be made within the framework of Sustainable Development.

Having the Holy Father, Pope Francis, involved in the climate change industry gives the one world government total control and a very powerful façade, particularly when His Holiness will address Congress in a very unprecedented move for the clergy to get involved in global politics and the U.S. and global economy instead of ministering to the souls of Catholics around the world. Theologian Leonardo Boff  is quick to point out the “Similarities between the Encyclical Laudato Si, ‘On Care for our Common Home,’ and the Earth Charter, ‘Earth, Our Home.’ http://www.earthcharterinaction.org/content/articles/1171/1/Theologian-Leonardo-Boff-reflects-on-the-linkages-between-the-Earth-Charter-and-the-Popes-Encyclical/Page1.html

And if you fail to go along with the Agenda 21 program and all the other auxiliary programs that keep springing up like wild mushrooms, i.e. replacing parents with “full-service community schools,” Maryland’s No Child Left Inside Act, walkability, the Blue Zones Project will nudge you into better health and wellbeing. As their website says, “We implement long-term, evidence-backed policies and interventions that optimize environments within communities, nudging people towards healthier choices throughout the day.”  https://www.bluezones.com/services/cities/

And your socially-engineered and indoctrinated kids will be dancing and singing in school praises to the Blue Zone Project.  Is it Orwellian enough for you yet? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GVVZTW7FLrI