United Nations has become a very powerful organization that yields a lot of power among globalists, including billionaire Americans who give to its causes dear to their hearts. The majority of U.N.’s funding comes from American taxpayers and they are either blissfully ignorant of what the U.N. is doing to our country or are actually supporting the United States’ demise.
The United
Nations has been able to impose over the years the globalist Agenda 21/2030 by
using the lynchpin Sustainable Development’s 17 goals which read quite
innocuous at first glance. But SD is the tool to create a new global economic
order after the destruction of U.S. capitalism.
Patrick Wood
has written about and discussed technocracy since the 1970s. He published many
books and articles on the topic. He has argued for a long time that technocracy
dominance and not communism is the true goal of the globalism. He wrote that
United Nations established Sustainable Development (SD) as “an outgrowth of
historic Technocracy from the 1930s.”
The Green
New Deal, U.N. Agenda 21/2030, Smart Cities, Public-Private Partnerships, Regionalism,
15-minute cities, and the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum (WEF) are goals
that must be accomplished at all costs. According to Patrick Wood, only then
the population of the earth will be “micro-managed by a Scientific Dictatorship.”
The
technocracy movement has been around since the 1930s. At the time, Julian
Huxley, an English evolutionary biologist and a left-wing internationalist
preoccupied with education, was the first director-general in 1946 of the newly
created United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
(UNESCO). His directorship only lasted two years instead of six. Catholic Americans
objected to his idea of controlling population growth with birth control.
Edward
Bellamy’s writings and the progressive engineers of the early twentieth century
defined the technocracy movement. The
term technocracy was invented in 1919 by William H. Smyth, an engineer
from California, “the rule of the people made effective through the agency of
their servants, the scientists and engineers.”
Howard Scott
and other writers advocated that “businesspeople were incapable of reforming
their industries in the public interest and that control of industry should be
given to engineers.” He is considered the founder of the technocracy movement.
Technocracy
Inc. proposed in
1938 that “technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific
operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and
services to the entire population of this continent [from Panama to the North
Pole],… as a scientific, technical, and engineering problem.” Goods will be
distributed by this technocracy by “means of a certificate of distribution
available to every citizen from birth to death.” The various splinter organizations
of the technocracy movement did not survive very long in New York and at
Columbia.
During this
time period, Aldous Huxley, Julian Huxley’s brother, wrote in 1931 and
published in 1932 his dystopian novel Brave New World which is set in a World
State in 2540 A.D. in the city of London, where citizens are environmentally
engineered by science into a social hierarchy based on intelligence. Reproductive
technology, sleep-learning, psychological manipulation, and classical
conditioning create a frightening society. Unfortunately some of these imagined
developments have come to fruition today, as science is already experimenting
with and accomplishing objectionable futuristic goals.
Citizens in
Huxley’s Brave New World are born through artificial wombs and children
are indoctrinated into predetermined classes based on intelligence and the type
of labor they are slated to perform. There are hatchery workers like Lenina
Crowne. Citizens are kept calm and in check with a drug called ‘soma.’
Richard
Gardner, a member of the Trilateral Commission (a non-governmental organization
or NGO), wrote in 1974 an article for Foreign Affairs Magazine entitled “The
Hard Road to World Order” in which he predicted the future of the Commission’s
self-described New International Economic Order – “an end-run around national
sovereignty,” “booming, buzzing confusion,” and building this Economic Order
from the “bottom up” instead of an “old-fashioned frontal assault.”
A Trilateral
Commission member, which cannot be identified as per its rules, spoke at the
New Delhi meeting on March 12, 2023, “Three decades of globalization – defined as
integrated, free-market based and deflationary – has been replaced by what will
be a multidecade period of globalization defined as fragmented,
not-free-market-based but industrial-policy based and structurally
inflationary.” This year, 2023, is Year One of this new global order.”
Trilateral Commission calls 2023 'Year One' of new world
order - Nikkei Asia
In our Depraved
New World where everything goes, the virtue signaling insane societal circus forces
citizens to buy into the mental delusion and disease of a few men who think that
they are women, that they can menstruate, have wombs, have babies, and compete in
women’s sports. If we don’t, we are sent to a pariah status by our technocratic
State.
The economy is
in inflationary and energy shambles, we are invaded by citizens from 200
different nations through our borderless southern and northern crossings, law
and order are worse than ever, education and medical care are lacking in this banana
republic, and the traditional family and Christianity are heavily under attack.
Who is going to save this Republic from implosion? Like the poet Juvenal wrote
in his Satires, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
.