The Depraved New World and Technocracy

United Nations has become a very powerful organization that yields a lot of power among globalists, including billionaire Americans who give to its causes dear to their hearts. The majority of U.N.’s funding comes from American taxpayers and they are either blissfully ignorant of what the U.N. is doing to our country or are actually supporting the United States’ demise.

The United Nations has been able to impose over the years the globalist Agenda 21/2030 by using the lynchpin Sustainable Development’s 17 goals which read quite innocuous at first glance. But SD is the tool to create a new global economic order after the destruction of U.S. capitalism.

Patrick Wood has written about and discussed technocracy since the 1970s. He published many books and articles on the topic. He has argued for a long time that technocracy dominance and not communism is the true goal of the globalism. He wrote that United Nations established Sustainable Development (SD) as “an outgrowth of historic Technocracy from the 1930s.”

The Green New Deal, U.N. Agenda 21/2030, Smart Cities, Public-Private Partnerships, Regionalism, 15-minute cities, and the Great Reset of the World Economic Forum (WEF) are goals that must be accomplished at all costs. According to Patrick Wood, only then the population of the earth will be “micro-managed by a Scientific Dictatorship.”

The technocracy movement has been around since the 1930s. At the time, Julian Huxley, an English evolutionary biologist and a left-wing internationalist preoccupied with education, was the first director-general in 1946 of the newly created United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). His directorship only lasted two years instead of six. Catholic Americans objected to his idea of controlling population growth with birth control.

Edward Bellamy’s writings and the progressive engineers of the early twentieth century defined the technocracy movement.  The term technocracy was invented in 1919 by William H. Smyth, an engineer from California, “the rule of the people made effective through the agency of their servants, the scientists and engineers.”

Howard Scott and other writers advocated that “businesspeople were incapable of reforming their industries in the public interest and that control of industry should be given to engineers.” He is considered the founder of the technocracy movement.

Technocracy Inc. proposed in 1938 that “technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population of this continent [from Panama to the North Pole],… as a scientific, technical, and engineering problem.” Goods will be distributed by this technocracy by “means of a certificate of distribution available to every citizen from birth to death.” The various splinter organizations of the technocracy movement did not survive very long in New York and at Columbia.

During this time period, Aldous Huxley, Julian Huxley’s brother, wrote in 1931 and published in 1932 his dystopian novel Brave New World which is set in a World State in 2540 A.D. in the city of London, where citizens are environmentally engineered by science into a social hierarchy based on intelligence. Reproductive technology, sleep-learning, psychological manipulation, and classical conditioning create a frightening society. Unfortunately some of these imagined developments have come to fruition today, as science is already experimenting with and accomplishing objectionable futuristic goals.

Citizens in Huxley’s Brave New World are born through artificial wombs and children are indoctrinated into predetermined classes based on intelligence and the type of labor they are slated to perform. There are hatchery workers like Lenina Crowne. Citizens are kept calm and in check with a drug called ‘soma.’

Richard Gardner, a member of the Trilateral Commission (a non-governmental organization or NGO), wrote in 1974 an article for Foreign Affairs Magazine entitled “The Hard Road to World Order” in which he predicted the future of the Commission’s self-described New International Economic Order – “an end-run around national sovereignty,” “booming, buzzing confusion,” and building this Economic Order from the “bottom up” instead of an “old-fashioned frontal assault.”

A Trilateral Commission member, which cannot be identified as per its rules, spoke at the New Delhi meeting on March 12, 2023, “Three decades of globalization – defined as integrated, free-market based and deflationary – has been replaced by what will be a multidecade period of globalization defined as fragmented, not-free-market-based but industrial-policy based and structurally inflationary.” This year, 2023, is Year One of this new global order.” Trilateral Commission calls 2023 'Year One' of new world order - Nikkei Asia

In our Depraved New World where everything goes, the virtue signaling insane societal circus forces citizens to buy into the mental delusion and disease of a few men who think that they are women, that they can menstruate, have wombs, have babies, and compete in women’s sports. If we don’t, we are sent to a pariah status by our technocratic State.

The economy is in inflationary and energy shambles, we are invaded by citizens from 200 different nations through our borderless southern and northern crossings, law and order are worse than ever, education and medical care are lacking in this banana republic, and the traditional family and Christianity are heavily under attack. Who is going to save this Republic from implosion? Like the poet Juvenal wrote in his Satires, Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

 

It Takes an Algorithm to Know a Lot About You

“I believe the primary role of the state is to teach, train, and raise children. Parents have a secondary role.”  - Hillary Clinton, “It Takes a Village”

Sci-fi movies like Minority Report, with a trio of psychics called “recogs” who can see “pre-visions” of crimes yet to be committed, setting in motion a Pre Crime Unit, came to mind when reading about China’s effort to detect “pre-crime.”

Bloomberg Business is reporting that “The Communist Party has directed one of the country’s largest state-run defense contractors, China Electronics Technology Group, to develop software to collect data on jobs, hobbies, consumption habits, and other behavior of ordinary citizens to predict terrorist acts before they occur.” http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-03/china-tries-its-hand-at-pre-crime

It was reported that the DOD’s Office of Naval Research (ONR) called for research proposals to study social media and how it could facilitate insights into people’s real thoughts, emotions and beliefs, and thus predict behavior.

It is obvious that Facebook is collecting data on people’s beliefs, likes and dislikes, often prompting them to play silly personal discovery games that yield a score after ten questions are asked which may seem random to the average person but they are cleverly designed to mine data and information on that person.

Algorithms are said to “accurately detect key features of speech linked to structural patterns such as humor, metaphor, emotion, language innovations, and subtle non-verbal elements of communication such as pitch, posture, gesture, from text, audio, and visual media.”

Measuring cognitive behavior, it is alleged that a software called ‘Beware’ is already being used to analyze social media activity, property records, records of friends and associates, assigning a “threat score.” Police might use such a “threat score” to pre-judge if a person is dangerous. http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2016-03-08/the-crime-you-have-not-yet-committed

Can computers accurately predict the future? Amazon uses algorithms to guess what you are likely to purchase, meteorologists make short-term accurate weather forecasts, and Facebook pop up ads from companies you liked or offering similar items you have purchased on line from various vendors; videos of movies you may like to watch may pop up on the screen as suggestions based on your past viewing. In certain cases computers have made strides in “predicting who will commit a violent crime.”

Controlling someone’s life, whether through data-mining or medical breakthroughs that involve DNA typing, does not stop with intrusive research and computer manipulation. Overt government control of our children is promoted by many on the left, including presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton. She is of the opinion that parents are secondary in raising their child, the state comes first in its job to teach, train, and raise a child in order to better influence who they are, what they become, and where their loyalties reside.

I still remember the wife of the socialist dictator Ceausescu, Elena, who told the soldiers who arrested her in 1989 that she raised them, how dare they put handcuffs on her? We were to refer to her as our mother and the mother of the country, that our biological parents were just caretakers entrusted by the state.

Ambry Genetics, a prominent DNA-testing firm located in Orange County, CA, revealed a new database that contains the aggregated genetic information of 10,000 patients with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. With the explanation that insights may lead to better medicines and a healthier future for everybody, the company welcomes “collaboration with pharmaceutical companies to speed the discovery of new diagnostic targets, treatments, and cures to save more lives, sooner.” Ambry Genetics “hopes to expand the database by adding genetic information from 20,000 individuals each year.”

Drug Discovery and Development magazine interviewed Ambry CEO Charlie Dunlop who said, “Based on the sheer volume of the data we have released, we have already close to 200 new genes implicated in breast and ovarian cancer. This is about 10 times more genes than was publicly known yesterday, broadening understanding and potentially opening up more drug targets than from any single data release in history.” http://www.dddmag.com/articles/2016/03/massive-genetic-database-opens-public

But certain risk factors do not necessarily mean that a patient typed with such risk will actually get the disease. Are such genetic banks only about “preventing” genetic diseases? Might they have culling implications? Is playing God a good idea? Doing in vitro fertilization, screening the embryos, discarding the imperfect ones, creating 3-parent embryos, where will it stop? If you have changes in BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, might insurance be refused to you, or perhaps a birth permit will be denied if it goes that far.

Might life imitate art eventually? In the 1997 movie “Gattaca,” the main character, Vincent Freeman, cannot travel into outer space because he is genetically inferior, an “in-valid.” In order to pursue his dream, he must purchase the genes of a laboratory-engineered “valid.”

From an unclassified document released in January, Money Morning is reporting that “the FBI’s Office of Partner Engagement revealed a new agency initiative based on Britain’s ‘anti-terror’ mass surveillance program.” This agency “requests that high school educators across the country inform on students who express ‘anti-government’ or ‘anarchist’ political beliefs.” Upon their observations, teachers report behaviors that they think might lead to violence, including persons who believe in conspiracy theories such as global government, police state, are those who believe in “libertarianism or constitutionalism.” http://moneymorning.com/2016/03/10/fbi-recruits-u-s-educators-to-inform-on-your-childs-political-affilliations/

Is Brave New World, Aldous Huxley’s vision of a dystopian future in which “humans were genetically bred and pharmaceutically anesthetized to passively serve a ruling order” still just his dark fiction that has frightened readers since 1931?

In our new and highly computerized world, “the lives of others” can be effortlessly watched and dissected to the DNA level and then lovingly controlled in order to preserve them the right way.