Tyranny of the Global Government is Here Whether You See It or Not

After the Cold War was over, the political pundits declared that there is a new international game plan called the New World Order. Among the first supporters of such a New World Order was our 41^st President, George H. W. Bush.

Former Ambassador David B. Funderburk wrote in January 1991, “Bush emphasized the New World Order in a nationally television address and in his letter to Congress…” He called it “a defining moment in world history.”

Bush’s New World Order was the first step on the path to one world government. Bush declared that he wanted “to craft a new world order for the resolution of disputes.” Unfortunately, it has become so much more than the “resolution of disputes” between tribes and nations. (Betrayal of America, 1991, p. 112)

Political analysts have described the makeup of this New World Order as one major power, selected from 4-5 nations leading the world affairs, and dominating everything on earth with help from U.N., global corporatists, and individual billionaires.

The money changers/managers behind the scenes, from global corporations and power centers, were to direct everything. Sovereignty and nationality were slated to disappear in the massive rogue wave of the New World Order.

The U.N.’s power was to be imposed on all countries and people no longer had the right to choose anything, including their system of government. All were to be subjugated to the will of the U.N.’s control.

The original idea of a New World Order came from the League of Nations and was transferred to the United Nations, “to create a new global political and economic system to replace the existing one.”

George H. W. Bush, with its main ally in this New World Order, the Soviet Union, praised the United Nations publicly. “A hundred generations searched for an elusive path to peace, and we are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.” Funderburk described the U.N. as “a hotbed of KGB spies and Third World anti-American radicals.” Today the U.N. is anything but a peace-keeping organization. (pp. 114-116)

Was Bush’s plan for this global government intended to help the average American taxpaying citizen? No, it was meant to help the U.N., the powerful insiders in the U.S., and the communists in Moscow.

Bush talked to Gorbachev about “shared goals,” but they were not discussing the preservation of the American way of life, belief in God, the traditional family, individual worth, dignity, private property, or the maintenance of our Constitutional Republic.

They discussed how to divide the world’s resources, the military policing of areas around the globe, not how to preserve American values, Christian beliefs, and family principles. They emphasized “democracy,” a communist propaganda term, as deceptive as people calling themselves the Democratic Party instead of the Democrat Party. There is nothing democratic about the Democrat Party.

Political pundits in the U.S. also tried to explain the New World Order as a necessity following the “revolutions of 1989” in Eastern Europe where the old political order was destroyed, and those countries needed a new order. They were not told, however, that such a transition would require the end of their national independence.

Samuel Francis wrote, “U.N. treaties demand that the United States alter its laws to suit the demands of a foreign political body.” Having communist tyrants and dictators in the U.N. who tell the rest of the free world what to do, it was assured that the scourge of communism would never disappear, and it would eventually be adopted by a large segment of the American population. And it has. There are many Democrat politicians who are declaring themselves supporters of socialism and communism. (p. 120)

U.N. demanded that their powers be massively expanded to “manage vast problems such as global warming, refugees, overpopulation, environmental damage and the eradication of hunger and disease,” … “the end of separate nations governing their own citizens.” (p. 120)

It is glaringly evident that the one world government tyranny is here, and its supporters have already infiltrated around the world. Can they be stopped? Is it too late to salvage our Constitutional Republic from the assault of foreign nationals and corrupt American politicians who are working overtime to dismantle it?

 

 

 

The New World Order Morphing into Global Governance

James Gustave Speth, after co-founding the Natural Defense Council in 1971, ran the World Resource Institute, ultimately becoming the head of the U.N. Development Program.

In 1997, Speth said, “Global governance is here, here to stay, and driven by economic and environmental globalization, global governance will inevitably expand.”

Thanks to U.N. Agenda 21 signed by most nations in 1992, and to President Clinton who started its implementation at all levels of government, U.N. global governance has expanded and taken over everything with SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT and its lynchpin, SUSTAINABILITY.

What exactly is global governance? Maurice Strong, with a U.N.-funded Commission on Global Governance, produced a 410-page report, Our Global Neighborhood, with recommendations. It was not defined until 1999: “Global governance is the framework of rules, institutions, and practices that set limits on behavior of individuals, organizations, and companies.” The U.N. claims that global governance is not the same as world government which is ridiculous semantics.

Global governance definition expanded into “policies created by non-elected bureaucrats from international institutions, usually located in Switzerland, who limit the behavior of individuals, organizations, and companies.”

Ever since Cecil Rhodes’ “Secret Society” of 1891, a select group of European monarchs, global billionaires, and other elites believed that society would be best controlled by a benevolent global government made up of “enlightened intelligentsia.”

This philosophy was advanced by organizations such as Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, World Federalist Association, Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, Center for American Progress, and others.

Was the origin of global governance, the wide restrictions on individual freedoms at all levels, the New World Order?

In 1990-1991, following the 1989 collapse of the Soviet Union, the idea of President Bush’s New World Order (NWO) quickly became part of the media lexicon. Bush had “emphasized the New World Order in a nationally televised address and in his official letter to Congress.” He said that he was going “to craft a new world order for the resolution of disputes.”

National Security Adviser Brent Scowcroft termed the NWO a “defining moment in world history.”  Serious thinkers realized that his New World Order (Novo Ordo Seclorum on our dollar bills) was the first step on the road to one world government or global governance.

The New World Order envisioned was developed via United Nations and global corporations. Technocracy, with the extreme global power it has today, did not exist in the 1990s.

David Funderburk, a former Ambassador, wrote at the time that the idea of using United Nations as a New World Order manager was half-baked since the United Nations was a “hotbed of KGB spies and Third World anti-American radicals.”

Thinkers quickly realized that “the old ideas of sovereignty and nationality will be casualties of the New World Order,” while money managers, global corporations, large banks, and other financial power centers will control everything from behind the scenes.

In 1991 David B. Funderburk asked a very significant question in his book, Betrayal of America, if the New World Order will put an end to American sovereignty. This sad reality is unfortunately in development now.

Throughout history, imposing one’s will on other countries and denying nations the right to choose their own system of government by interfering in their affairs and politics has not ended well.

Bush ran with the NWO idea. The League of Nations was probably the initial promoter of the NWO notion, to create a “new global political and economic system to replace the existing one.”

Michael Collins Piper wrote in “Who’s Behind the New World Order” in 1990 that U.N. and its promoters from the Council on Foreign Relations played the main role in Bush’s plans for the New World Order.

Henry Kissinger was a huge advocate for globalism and the one world government/global governance. He said in an interview that the challenge will be to maintain the new balance of power of the New World Order and that peace must be maintained by “global and regional balances of power.”

The New World Order was a major step toward one world government/global governance. The New World Order was not designed to benefit the average, tax paying American, but the elites and the Marxist billionaires.

Nothing about the American way of life would be preserved in the NWO: belief in God, the traditional family, self-worth and dignity, private property, individual liberties, and the representative Constitutional Republic. Instability would be planned and directed by government bureaucrats with cooperation from the media’s disinformation and deception machine.

The Soviets and all their satellites had advocated for a world government under a Communist leadership, but it never happened. The greedy American elites today are advocating the same world government/global governance, and they are succeeding even though it will spell the end of our American sovereignty.

Samuel Francis wrote in The Washington Times, Son of New World Order, on October 24, 1990, “U.N. treaties demand that the United States alter its laws to suit the demands of a foreign political body.” All treaties, conventions, and conferences organized by the United Nations over many decades required the end of national independence.

Mentioned in Francis’ article is a quote by Brian Urquhart, former Under Secretary General for Special Political Affairs at the U.N., “the U.N. should be granted expanded powers to manage vast problems such as global warming, refugees, overpopulation, environmental damage, and the eradication of hunger and disease.” Almost four decades later, it is happening.

Over time, U.S. politicians have complied with the U.N. dictates, while American citizens remained powerless to stop it, including the illegal alien invasion of the last four years. These powers were granted to the U.N. by corrupt politicians.

The end of separate nations governing their own citizens is here, along with the serious damage to western civilization. Global governance by elites who know best what is good for us is threatening our health, survival, and the self-sufficiency of healthy food production is in serious trouble. We don’t need to eat bugs with the dangerous chitin which humans cannot digest.

The existence in the U.N. of Communist tyrants and other dictators ensures that the scourge of Communism will not be defeated, it will be assisted by Americans and transferred across the ocean to America. And this has already occurred with the 2020 successful Marxist coup.

The late Henry Lamb wrote in 2010, “If America is to be free, Americans must rise up and force the government to abandon its quest for dictatorial power and honor the limitations on power set forth in the U.S. Constitution.”

Our Globalist World

Our modern world is changing fundamentally in a very short period of time, and we are becoming global citizens. We are closer than ever to a new world order, no borders, no national identity, digital currency, Chinese style social scores (rewarding and punishing behavior of all citizens), 15-minute cities, sustainable everything in life, no national language, global citizens shaped and controlled by billionaire globalists and their worker bees in various NGOs (non-governmental organizations), generously funded by said billionaires, central banks, central governments, and heads of state who share their agenda.

For the first time in history, the modern world which owes its existence to Europe, is not shaped by geography, i.e., mountains, peaks, rivers, valleys, oceans, seas, and large lakes. It is shaped by irrational fear, a bioweapon, governments, two proxy wars, and especially the false global warming/climate change narrative.

Tim Marshall, in his book, Prisoners of Geography, argues that geographical features explain “why there are so many nation states,” cultures, and languages, not just in Europe but all over the world.

Marshall theorizes that the Danube basin and the Danube River (1,771 miles long), originating in Germany’s Black Forest and flowing into the Black Sea, “affects eighteen countries and forms natural borders along the way,” a potential explanation why there are so many small countries in Europe. He explains that the Danube even formed natural borders during the Roman Empire, later during the Ottoman Empire, and during the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Physical barriers such as tall mountains and peaks have prevented countries from going to war, a strong deterrent against military invasions. Ethnic and religious divisions have been marked by rivers which created a border.

Topography, i.e. navigable rivers, flatlands, deserts, the absence or existence of high mountains, ignoring harsh climates, very cold, dry, or extremely rainy, have been recipes for disasters across history.

One example of a very large country which has been invaded multiple times from the west (Poles, Swedes, French, Germans, to name a few) in the last 500 years is Russia. It is six-million square miles huge; has eleven time zones; it takes six days to cross by train. It has vast forests, lakes, rivers, frozen tundra, steppes, taiga, and mountains.

But things are changing now in the twenty-first century. Many countries today have powerful drones, western technology, and smart weaponry on their side.

Who is controlling the modern world then if “borders, language, and cultures” are no longer significant in the existence of a nation? For a short answer, it is the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization, European Union, World Economic Forum with its enslaving Great Reset, World Bank, central banks with digital currency, technocrats, the Bilderbergers, and the Council of Foreign Relations. For a longer answer, add power mad billionaires of all stripes, corrupt politicians of all parties, heads of state, academia, mainstream media, and Hollywood.

How are these globalist entities and individuals accomplishing the fast conversion of the traditional world, formerly limited by geography and made up of 195 countries, into a one world government and open borders?

-         Health control manipulating fear and mass hysteria (WHO, UN, and governments)

-         Water control manipulation (UN and climate NGOs)

-         Weather manipulation (governments and their military)

-         Purposeful desertification (UN, governments, environmental NGOs)

-         Global warming transformed into climate change industry propaganda (UN and all its myriad of organizations, governments, media, heads of state)

-         Technology manipulating how we live (technocracy, UN, EU, governments)

-         Space technology (military, governments, heads of state)

-         Creation of artificial shortages through governmental polices (all of the above)

-         Interdiction of plentiful fossil fuels use (presidential decrees and executive orders, all of the above)

-         Destruction of thriving economies by forcing them to adopt insufficient wind and solar energy at all levels (UN, EU, heads of state, billionaires, and all environmental NGOs)

-         Destruction of the supply chain of goods and services (all of the above)

-         Deliberate famine through control of food production and distribution (UN, WEF, politicians, heads of state, NGO propaganda)

-         Population reduction through faulty and untested vaccines (WHO, UN)

-         Radiation from 5G technology, smart meters, and Wi-Fi (UN, technocracy, governments, EU, WEF)

-         Indoctrination to accept global tyranny without any protest (media, academia, Hollywood)

-         Digital currency controlling everything we do, with the ability to steal wealth, deny wealth accumulation, freedom, travel, food, health care, denying fertilizer use, education, housing, electricity, fuel, heat, air conditioning, access to cars, entertainment (central banks, World Bank, UN, WEF, technocracy, heads of state, governments, EU, NGOs, agriculture departments)

The red reset button (an emergency stop button in industrial equipment) which Hillary Clinton had awkwardly presented in translation to Russian Minister Sergey Lavrov in Geneva on March 6, 2009, was meant to be a symbol of political reset between the two nations’ diplomacy.

In retrospect, was this uncomfortable gesture much more than that, could it have also symbolized the coming dangerous reset of the world as we know it?

 

Disorder and Corruption in a New World Order

When I deplaned from my comfortable KLM flight on a late September afternoon at the ultra-modern Henri Coanda International Airport at Otopeni, Romania, I was greeted by stifling humid heat inside and out. People were milling about with sweaty brows from the lack of air conditioning use. I picked up the key and contract to my rental car and hurried outside. It was somewhat more bearable – at least there was a slight breeze.

The rental lot gate keeper required a small bribe to let me in. The employee who handed me the key to the car spent an inordinate amount of time presenting all the features on the car, treating me gingerly as if I was incapable of comprehension. I probably drove more vehicles and more years than he had imagined or I cared to admit. The VW Jetta would be my means of transportation for the next 12 days – no crowded trains, buses, metro, trolleybuses, or trams. I had spent an extra $55 on a GPS, knowing that it would be my lifeline between being utterly lost and finding where I wanted to go. Road signs, I learned the hard way last year, were scarce and incomprehensible at best. I never knew when roads ended sharply onto pastures as far as my eyes could see.

With a condescending smirk on his face, the Avis attendant allowed me to drive off, not before tipping the gate attendant again. Because remuneration is so miserly for most people, they supplement wages with bribes. Little has changed since the communist regime. And thus began my journey of discovery and reportage into the new world order of capitalism infected by neo-communism of European lineage.

Every 350 meters, the GPS voice warned me of roundabouts. After a while, I felt like I was in roundabout hell. As long as I followed the only traffic rule that Romanian drivers respected, the car already in the roundabout has priority, I was safe. As I become more comfortable with roundabouts, I realized that they saved me money, time, and Diesel. This was welcome news since gas and Diesel were $10 a gallon. Diesel Maxx, a bio fuel mixture with rapeseed oil, was almost $11 a gallon. We used rapeseed oil to cook with under Ceausescu’s regime when sun flower cooking oil was hard to find. I could have sworn my Diesel smelled like French fries.

Traffic rules were mere humorous suggestions. Only visitors like me respected or followed them. Drivers passed each other on the left, on the right, on the sidewalk, on the pedestrian median, on the tram tracks, parked wherever they wished, drove very fast and in reverse in the middle of a multi-lane street. The few traffic police, Politia Rutiera, hardly kept up with the infractors. Now and then I would see a car with a boot on or a speeding car stopped by a policeman who was writing a ticket. Most drivers get out of paying fines by offering bribes. They know someone who knows someone else and thus the ticket is voided, no lesson learned.

I finally understood the condescension of the rental lot attendant. Male drivers considered female drivers a nuisance on the road that prevented male chauvinists from reaching their destinations faster, like a fly in a fresh glass of milk, an attitude left from the communist era when women were generally not allowed to drive and few actually passed the very stringent driving test.

Stations used attendants to pump gas for patrons, especially for women. Perhaps men thought we were not competent enough to pump our own gas. I enjoyed this service immensely, not having to get my hands dirty with Diesel. I gladly paid the tip.

Drivers honked angrily and constantly at each other, leaving those driving within the speed limit in a halo of dust. The noise pollution in big cities was huge. Pedestrians were target practice for the angry, rude, and hurried drivers. The mortality rate of pedestrians was unacceptably high.

I became exhaustingly defensive and tense in my driving, watching for goats, sheep, cows, shepherds, buggies, horses, bad drivers, and foolish pedestrians darting across busy highways and roads with total disregard for their own safety.

I was driving cautiously slow in the Carpathian Mountains through endless hairpin curves, my four-cylinder Jetta struggling to climb the steep incline. The GPS’ purple image of the twisted road looked like a heart monitor in atrial fibrillation. I did not dare look much to my left or right – the huge drops made my stomach churn and gave me vertigo. Yet drivers would honk and pass me with total disregard for the double lines painted on the road or the risk to their lives and the lives of others. They were on a mission to get wherever they were going really fast. The roads were littered with smashed vehicles and upturned 18-wheelers, taking up sometimes 5 hours or more to clear the road. Forty miles from my medieval town destination, Sighisoara, the driver of an 18-wheeler had overturned his fully loaded rig, blocking both lanes, and stopping traffic for six hours. I only hope that he survived this terrible accident that he alone had caused.

Many things have improved in the lives of Romanians since the fall of communism in 1989. Capitalism and entrepreneurship are flourishing because regulatory bureaucracy is insignificant when compared to regulations in the west. But unchecked and unpunished corruption coupled with expected briberies have reached pandemic proportions.

Business is conducted on two levels – there is the legal contract for taxation purposes, and the “sub rosa” contract, hiding the real transaction. Usually, the written contracts contain lower figures in order to escape taxation. The oral, under the table contracts, during which bribes and percentages are paid to various middlemen, are really the bona fide contracts. Written contractual documents are so arcane and complex that state notaries have very lucrative offices, raking in more money than attorneys.

State owned enterprises are scavenged by various interested parties who are appointed to run them, with total disregard for public/private ownership or accountability. Those running and/or managing the plant become “ticks” that “suck” the plant’s resources to bolster their own private companies, just like they used to do under the communist regime.

Case in point, Oltchim S.A., one of the largest chemical companies in Romania with over 3,300 employees, has not paid its employees in months and is now bankrupt. The economic crisis of 2008, mismanagement and theft of resources by employee “ticks” that drained resources and sucked the lifeblood of Oltchim for their own private interests were the undoing of Oltchim S.A. Oltchim S.A. used to be the Ramnicu Vilcea Chemical Works during Ceausescu’s communist regime. It became a joint-stock company in 1990 by post-communist government decision.

According to Dan Straut, Oltchim had become a victim of the fall 2008 economic crisis when Petrom, the main supplier of inputs for Oltchim, closed its petrochemical installations. Oltchim is heavily in debt, owing 250 million euros to AVAS (the state authority) and 147 million euros in utilities. Oltchim is a major player in the Romanian economy because it produces chemicals used in 80 percent of consumer products and is a main exporter. (September 10, 2012)

While I was in Romania, the scandal and the circus that followed Oltchim’s inability to meet its payroll for six month or more and pay its creditors, placed two camps at odds on a daily basis – those who wanted to maintain the state ownership of Oltchim, promising to raise the 45 million euros needed to save it, and those who wanted to completely privatize it in order to reorganize it and weed out the waste, unaccountability, and corruption. Dan Diaconescu, a TV station owner, misled the whole country that he would raise the necessary funds to give workers their back wages and pay creditors, coming up short and empty-handed with only 3 million euros in a bag from mysterious European sources. The corruption and mystery continue.

My hotel in Brasov was hosting a Cybercrime Seminar sponsored by the U.S. Embassy, American Express, EBay, Microsoft, Western Union, MoneyGram International, and Trust wave. During discussions encouraging Romanian authorities to pass tougher laws on cyber criminals and offering help and expertise, a participating Romanian judge took umbrage with the suggestion and pointed out that foreigners cannot come into their country and tell them what to do. In other words, we like to maintain the status quo. So what if hapless Americans and westerners with money to burn are defrauded by young Romanian cyber criminals, often underage, by hundreds of millions of dollars?

It appears that old habits die hard. Sixty years of communism, theft, and abuse of power are hard to overcome even though a strange form of capitalism has taken strong roots in Romania. The shadow communism never went away and is re-emerging with a vengeance in public life with empty promises of free food, easy money, and free housing. The corruption that emerged from communism got more sophisticated and exploded on a grander scale, aided by the Internet age and the ability to travel freely and quickly across many time zones.