A lot of humans have died from heat exposure, in freezing temperatures, in wilderness, in war trenches, frozen on Mt. Everest, marching in war convoys, marching to concentration camps, inside concentration camp barracks, in gulags in subzero temperatures, submerged in icy water, in crashes on mountain tops or jungles, hiking, mountain climbing, and many other horrible conditions.
Angel, a Jew sent to Auschwitz in Nazi
Germany, witnessed an entire ward freeze to death overnight, without beds,
heat, and food. She alone survived with an old man because she spent all night
trying to warm him up, rubbing his hands, legs, face, and neck. When the sun
came up, there was an eerie silence around them, they were surrounded by frozen
corpses. Nobody should suffer such inhuman conditions.
Nobody should suffer extreme heat or freeze
to death in their homes because they cannot afford heat or air conditioning from
whatever source or because they cannot pay their utility bills.
Nobody should be forced by the global
elites’ U.N. Agenda 2030 to achieve “net zero” emissions by setting their
furnaces to a high of 60 degrees Fahrenheit in winter and their air
conditioners to 80+ F degrees in summer.
There was nothing positive about the
installation of Smart Meters around the globe starting ten years ago. They are
more expensive than traditional meters, don’t last long, the cost per kWh per
customer has increased dramatically, it spies on each household without a
search warrant, it cuts off power to homes during high demand in the coldest or
hottest days of the year, sell the data it collects to third parties, bombards homes
with radiation every 12 seconds, and it causes health issues in sensitive
customers when the smart meter is attached directly to the home.
The Telegraph has reported on February 8, 2022, that “Smart
meters are to automatically send energy suppliers half-hourly updates on their
customers’ power use in a revolutionary move that will allow ‘surge pricing’
in millions of households’ bills.”
The energy regulator Ofgem will be
granted legal powers in May to charge customers at peak times more for electricity
usage and customers must “opt in.”
Smart Meters were first introduced as “opt
in” but became mandatory quickly and people had to fight in courts to be able
to ‘opt out.’ Claimed price savings and convenience from the installation of
Smart Meters never materialized. It only benefitted the utilities because it
did not have to store excess capacity for times when the demand was higher. The
“surge pricing” is also described as saving customers money whereby said
customers would use electricity at times when the charges are lower. https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/smart-meter-overhaul-to-open-gates-for-e2-80-98surge-pricing-e2-80-99/ar-AATDUJ6?ocid=uxbndlbing
Customers who live in old homes, use
outdated appliances, need electricity around the clock for life-saving devices or
more heat will be penalized, and will pay much higher prices on fixed incomes.
Might such individuals who live on
fixed incomes and who might have their power cut off for lack of payment freeze
in their own homes or die of heat strokes? It has happened certainly in the
U.S. and elsewhere during extremely cold winters and very hot summers.
Imagine millions of electric cars, all
trying to charge at the same time during the night, and the large economy also
pulling electricity from the grid during those times. What exactly would happen
to the grid? It will certainly crash, resulting in unnecessary deaths from
freezing, heat strokes, or the inability to use life-saving devices.
Imagine so much deforestation to meet
the cardboard boxes and paper bags demand that people would be unable to find
sufficient wood to heat their homes.
Imagine the prices of home heating
fuel escalating due to the anti-fossil fuel policies of western administrations
around the world who harmonize their globalist policies to dispense with fossil
fuels by 2050.
Imagine being unable to obtain the
necessary electricity from solar panels and wind turbines to supply large
economies and the population. How many will freeze to death or die of heat
strokes due to such idiotic and unworkable socialist regime policies?
It seems that we are not willing to
learn from history, not just our own, but the history of other socialist
regimes run by the Communist Party into the ground.
Even before the harsh winter of 1984-85,
the socialist regime in my former country was not prepared to deliver adequate
levels of energy supplies to the people. Winters had power shortages, heat, sudden
and arbitrary electricity, water, and hot water cutoffs, and rationing of
gasoline at the pumps.
Private cars were banned on the roads,
heat to apartments, buildings, and factories was cut in half, in hopes to save
energy at the expense of the people. It did not just create misery all around,
but it caused so much unnecessary illness and death by freezing. Babies died in
incubators in hospitals when electric plugs were pulled to save energy.
Former Ambassador David B. Funderburk
wrote in his book, Pinstripes and Reds, that in the winter of 1984-85 “reports
indicated that one of every three babies born in hospitals in Romania during
the winter of 1984-85 either died or was born severely ill and deformed.” (p.
80)
The extreme cold and snow were gone by
April 1985, but private cars were still banned from the roads and highways in
order to save on fossil fuels. The lack of energy, heat, and food killed a lot
of very young and old people that infamous winter.
Are we willing to suffer such death by
freezing and famine in our former land of plenty because the country is run by
a socialist globalist cabal intent on destroying the U.S. and bringing it into
the dark ages? How much anemic light and darkness, and cold in winter are you
willing to tolerate in our stores and homes? And for that matter, how many
people are willing to sacrifice who will die in summertime from excessive
heat without the benefit of air conditioning, refrigeration, and the electricity
that runs them?