It is frightening how, after Parisians were killed in an attack orchestrated by ISIS, who recruited and convinced EU nationals to join them, how our regime and the leftist response is, "Wow, we need more of those Muslim refugees here!”
If you disagree, you are
ignorant, racist, un-American, and un-Christian, even though Islam is not a
race but a theocracy. And no one says, let’s bring in more Christian refugees
who legitimately face crucifixion, or Muslim gays who risk being thrown from
rooftops, or Muslim single mothers who risk being stoned to death for adultery,
or Syrian atheists who risk being burned alive, or Syrian girls who risk being
turned into sex slaves, abused, murdered, or sold. According to the regime, it
is "against American values" to accept anyone other than regressive,
radical Muslims. The regime’s anti-American conspiracy has become mainstream
liberal foreign policy.
Donald Trump’s poll
numbers have surged since he suggested that we should enact a temporary pause
in admitting any more Muslims into our country until the vetting process is
actually valid and working.
The media ignores the
fact that Jimmy Carter revoked Iranian visas during the hostage crisis in 1979.
Rush Limbaugh described and posted the video from the ABC News archives that demonstrates
that, what Trump had suggested, had been done before by President Carter and it
is neither bigoted nor xenophobic, it is acting in the best interest of the
American people, protecting their safety. http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015/12/11/abc_news_digs_up_video_of_jimmy_carter_announcing_ban_on_iranian_immigration
The few libertarians
still residing on American campuses cannot publicly post or voice their
divergent opinions because their progressive colleagues are so indoctrinated by
the "poor, innocent, cuddly" refugee idiocy that they can't see
objective reasoning and will skewer them.
My friend K. received
unbelievable backlash for saying "they should be screened not just for
terror, but to make sure they believe in the American principles of equality,
dignity, and freedom of religion--we don't need to import more bigots."
It reminded me of our
conversation in D.C., "Don't liberals and gays have any sense of
self-preservation?" Many of his liberal gay friends want to open America's
doors to these Muslims who would love to toss gays off of rooftops and stone
women to death for engaging in unmarried relationships or for dressing in
revealing clothes.
Liberal academics would
probably walk into areas where illegals have taken over the local government,
have exhausted welfare services, have changed the face and demographics of
schools, and turned the area into a cesspool of Sharia compliant ghetto and
would say, “Wow, diversity!” then leave to go eat, stay, and vacation in their
pretty white yuppie neighborhoods and hangouts.
Black Lives Matter, Stalinist
“useful idiots” and “crybullies” on the left’s payroll, have fanned around the
country, shrieking successfully in the faces of academics and administrators
who cower in fear and give in to their outrageous demands, transforming the
campus into an intolerant blitzkrieg, take no prisoners atmosphere, if anyone
disagrees with their views and demands.
And the namby-pamby
students themselves now whine about “safe spaces” on campus where they can be
sheltered from reality, work, and any kind of strenuous thinking that might
upset their drug-induced, rose-colored haze in vaunted majors such as women’s
studies, race studies, and communist social justice. They are frightened by the
sight of sober reality, American flags, Confederate flags, Halloween costumes,
Christian symbols, people with white skin and non-existent “white privilege,” personal
responsibility, entrepreneurship, and work ethic.
The concept of “safe
space” involves retreating from the challenges of college, of life and reality
in general, from the fear of uncertainty, an expression of the coddled
generations raised by liberal parents and perhaps well-intentioned
conservatives who wanted everything for their children that they did not have.
Did we have a safe space
in schools under socialism/communism? Maybe it was the dark, dank, smelly, and dirty
bathrooms flooded with urine. The courtyard was not a safe place either because
we were only allowed there when we arrived and assembled in rows before we
could go into the building, during PE classes once a day, and when we left
school – congregation or protests of any kind were not allowed.
If anybody protested
anything, they were dealt with speedily and efficiently – they never could nor
would do it again. We could not go to the teacher’s office because they did not
have one and talking to them would be like talking to an information gathering
agency that would be used against you.
It was not allowed to
congregate in the hallways unless one wanted detention. The classroom was not a
safe space either. You had to sit in your chair at rapt attention and take
notes. You had to keep your mouth shut unless asked a question. Should you give
the wrong answer, or talk out of line, you were given a verbal dress down, physical
punishment, but the next day you tried a little harder to blend into
conformity.
Life and reality have few
safe spaces. While these cowardly college students whine about escaping from the
“harsh” reality of the world, coddled and sheltered their entire lives by
liberal schools and misguided parents, brave American soldiers go to places
around the world most of us cannot even imagine, the last line of defense
between us and invading “refugees” who wish us harm.
Is a college “safe space”
a misguided escape to communist dystopia, the dystopia in which Saul Alinsky
still teaches his radicals to shake down the hard-working taxpayers under the
guise of “social justice” and “fair share?”
Colleges have created “free
speech zones,” tiny corners where divergent opinions may or may not be
tolerated. Now they demand “safe spaces” on their campuses. Do these college
students truly want safety in their country, on their campuses, or do they just
want spaces to whine and shake down the social structure?