His dire predictions that the planet will be flooded, islands
will be swallowed up by the melting of the glaciers, and the planet will roast
did not happen. The surface temperatures
have increased in some areas thanks to El Nino, a natural event, not because of
anthropogenic CO2, the gas of plant life.
Dr. John Christy, Director of the Earth System Science
Center at the University of Alabama Huntsville, is quoted: http://whatssupwiththat.com/2015/12/19/uah-un-climate-change-goal-new-trend-analysis-shows-were-there-now/
“The fastest warming
place on Earth over the past 37 years has been in the Arctic Ocean north of the
Svalbard archipelago, where temperatures have been rising 0.5 C (about 0.9
degrees F) per decade. The fastest cooling spot was over the eastern Antarctic
near Dome C. Temperatures there have been falling at the rate of 0.41 C (about
0.74 degrees F) per decade.”
According to Dr. Roy Spencer, the global-average warmth
during El Nino is caused by the solar energy but also by the vertical
circulation of the Pacific Ocean basin. http://drroyspencer.com/2016/01/what-causes-el-nino-warmth/
“The short answer is
that, during El Nino, there is an average decrease in the vertical overturning
and mixing of cold, deep ocean waters with solar-heated warm surface waters.
The result is that the surface waters become warmer than average, and deeper
waters become colder than average. The opposite occurs during La Nina.”
Non-scientists confuse weather events with climate and base
their decision to support the anthropogenic global warming theory now termed
climate change on “consensus science” which would be a derisive designation if
the stakes were not so expensive for humanity. Consensus means agreement of
opinion; science is based on fact, not opinion. Data seem to contradict
supporters of the climate change industry but it does not slow down their rabid
assault on civilization. Real scientists, labeled deniers and skeptics, are
marginalized, ridiculed, fired, and even made subjects of inquiries resembling
witch hunts.
Cashing in billions and trillions on weather and on climate
that has been changing for millennia, on fear of planetary Armageddon, is just
one aspect of the nefarious Agenda 21, a document signed in 1992 by 178
countries, including the United States, whose linchpin is Sustainable
Development, controlling almost every aspect of business activity and human
existence, now expanded into Agenda 2030, as some dubbed it “Agenda 21 on
steroids.”
The fact, that Congress has not ratified the 40-chapter
document, has not stopped every administration since to implement Agenda 21
through non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who received grants from the
federal government and then distributed those funds around the country to
entice them to accept and implement Agenda 21 at the state and local levels.
Destroying capitalism and rearranging life in accordance
with the dreams of elitist one world bureaucrats, rewilding the planet and reintroducing
grey wolves, high-rise mixed- use buildings with tiny apartment living,
population control, replacement of cars with light rail and biking, elimination
of suburbia and of private property is truly the plan behind Agenda 21. Its
environmentalist “useful idiots” supporters have not bothered to read the ample
document released under the aegis of United Nations.
I wrote about the transformation of U.N.’s Agenda 21 into
Agenda 2030 and explained the core goals of this lengthy document. http://canadafreepress.com/article/75315
Man has not been responsible for climate change over the
millennia; the Vostok ice core samples have proven that; nor was man
responsible for the Little Ice Age in the Middle Ages that had caused famine
and death due to shortened food growing seasons and freezing temperatures that
even affected Napoleon’s unprepared army in Russia. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/co2/vostok.html
John Kerry told the crowd at COP21 conference in Paris that
global warming is junk science yet they are still going to fleece us with the
fake climate change industry fees and taxes.
“The fact is that even if every single American citizen
biked to work, carpooled to school, used only solar panels out of their homes,
if we each planted a dozen trees, if we somehow eliminated all of our
domestic greenhouse gas emissions, guess what, that still wouldn’t be enough to
offset the carbon pollution coming from the rest of the world. If all the industrial nations went down to
zero emissions, it wouldn’t be enough. Not when more than 65 percent of the
world’s pollution comes from the developing world.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aAtiygrbTSg
As the planet did not cooperate to deliver the global
warming they had hoped for, the radical environmentalists renamed it climate
change – and it is a very profitable industry of renewables, carbon swaps,
solar panels, biofuels, and wind turbines.
Even though the billionaire father of the global new world
order Agenda 21, now renamed Agenda 2030, the Canadian Maurice Strong, passed
away on November 27, 2015, there are important supporters who have
picked up the fleecing torch of “climatism,” a potential cash cow worth
trillions of dollars.
In 1976 Maurice Strong was the head of the newly created
Petro-Canada, advised the gas industry, and made billions in oil and carbon
trade-offs. He was alleged to have been a member of the Board of Directors of
the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, “the world’s first and North
America’s only legally binding greenhouse gas emissions registry reduction
system for emission sources and offset projects in North America and Brazil.”
Fox News called Maurice Strong the “godfather of the
environmental movement,” the founding director of the U.N. Environment Program
(UNEP) in Nairobi. It is interesting
that China was the place where the “self-declared, life-long socialist” chose
to live for a while and die, in “one of the world’s biggest producers of
industrial pollution, [which] has been profiting from the trading of carbon
emission credits – thanks to heavily politicized U.N.-backed environmental
deals engineered by Strong in the 1990s.” http://www.foxnews.com/story/2007/02/08/at-united-nations-curious-career-maurice-strong.html
The whole agenda pushed by the U.N. hurts the interests of
the American people. Congressman Mike Rogers (R-AL) has introduced a bill to restore
U.S. sovereignty and withdraw U.S. from the U.N., a corrupt organization dubbed
the “dictators club.” The bill, titled The American Sovereignty and Restoration
Act of 2015 (H.R. 1205), faces an uphill battle as Congress seems unwilling to
make and pass laws that represent the interests of the American people. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/114/hr1205/text
In Siskiyou County, the fifth largest county by land mass in
California, on the Oregon border, ranching has kept the area unspoiled but the
environmentalists have decided to reintroduce the grey wolf, endangering 45,000
people and the ranchers’ herds of cattle grazing freely on the land. The city residents
believe that the introduction of “majestic predators howling in some distant
corner of their state” is romantic. Nobody really understands that rewilding at
the expense of humans is one of the goals
of Agenda 21. http://www.sacbee.com/news/local/environment/article51700790.html
Andrea Hutchinson transformed herself from a housewife and
mother to agricultural activist in Canton, Oklahoma, where her family
homesteaded in Dewey County in 1893, after hearing many horror stories of
farmers fighting to keep their farms, property rights, and their land under the
assault of “visioning committees,” environmentalist NGOs, and U.N. Agenda 21’s
ICLEI operatives who have infiltrated boards of supervisors and zoning boards across
the country. She wants her family to be
able to continue the ranching tradition.
The stories she heard ranged from “drones, abuse of the EPA, to threats
of Endangered Species destroying livelihoods.” http://www.hpj.com/archives/concern-over-agenda-turn-cattlewoman-into-agricultural-activist/article_ca963ae3-5227-5f17-821c-4acaa37472e0.html?mode=jqm
In a period of natural drought, Save the American River
Association advocated that “retiring and curbing water rights for 300,000 acres
of contaminated land farmed in the San Joaquin Valley would cost approximately
$1 billion” in compensation to farmers, “a reasonable price to pay to stop the
poisoning of California’s environment” and it “would free up 455,000 acre-feet
of water annually.” Would this “contaminated land” in San Joaquin Valley, asked
Katy Grimes, be the 600 farms along I-5 that produce $1 billion worth of food
each year? These are not unsustainable crops, retiring them is a war on
agriculture, on our ability to feed Americans. http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/california-forum/article52319970.html
It is interesting that the water “rationers” are considering
such drastic measures when, according to California officials, wet weather
added 6.4 billion gallons of fresh water to Lake Tahoe (2 inches) and new snow
is at “136 percent of normal levels.” The snowpack was measured in Sierra
Nevada at 54 inches. http://www.capoliticalreview.com/top-stories/ca-snowpack-136-of-normal-how-will-water-rationers-spin-that/?utm_source=CAPoliticalReview.com&utm_campaign=2909021a1f-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_b855a22bd3-2909021a1f-302742409
Destroying farms and taking as many out of production as
possible, endangering food production and survival, would help achieve another goal
of Agenda 21 – depopulation. We seem to have exceeded the planet’s “carrying
capacity.” Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change, said in 2015 that the entire global
warming hoax was designed in order to destroy capitalism. “Really, we should
make every effort to change those numbers [population] because we are already,
today, exceeding the planet’s planetary carrying capacity,” Figueres claimed. This is an outrageous statement, particularly
when we look at the low fertility rates in the developed world, way below
replacement values. http://www.jewsnews.co.il/2015/04/27/un-official-we-should-make-every-effort-to-depopulate-the-planet-2/
Once suburbia is destroyed and the land given back to
wilderness, the population will be moved into high-rise, mixed-use micro
apartments, stacked and packed, ranging from 150-360 square feet, mostly
smaller than the average hotel room. It is like sticking people into closets. Promoting
living in Mega Cities, Christiana Figueres praised the high-rise living because
renters can grow their food on terraces, collect rainwater on the roof, and get
their electricity from solar panels on balconies/roofs. What can possibly go
wrong with such an unsustainable scenario? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seDpS2QEoNw
Speaking at the anti-COP21 climate summit in Paris, Dr.
Istvan Marko, professor at Universite Catholique de Louvain in Belgium and
co-author of The Bankruptcy of Climatism,
said, “All conclusions being reached
by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] are actually flawed
conclusions.” The dogma of “climatism” is perpetuated in spite of ample
evidence to the contrary because governmental research grants come with strings
attached to this fake religion of anthropogenic global warming.
Marko said, “It is almost like a religion, you know, you
have the original sin, the original sin is carbon dioxide, and the one who committed
it is the human being. So we all have to repent.”
In his speech at the summit, “The Nostradamuses of Climate Change and Their Erroneous Prophecies,”
Dr. Marko repeated what all thinking humans already know, CO2 is the gas of
plant life and our oxygen. “The worst thing that can happen is decreasing the
amount of carbon dioxide in the air.” Greenhouses add more CO2 in the air
because their plants thrive on carbon dioxide.
Thanks to CO2, “there is a greening around the world.” According
to Dr. Randall Donohue, findings of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial
Research Organization (CSIRO) in collaboration with the Australian National
University (ANU) revealed that during 1982-2010 an eleven percent increase in “CO2
fertilization” has increased the foliage in arid areas of Australia, North
America, the Middle East, and Africa. http://phys.org/news/2013-07-greening-co2.html
All this “climatism” is not about saving the planet, “It’s
the slow erosion of your own individual liberty, that’s what is at stake with
COP21.” He stated that for half the annual cost of the Kyoto Protocol ($150
billion), people in the third world could have running water, electricity,
food, and education. http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22232-at-anti-un-climate-summit-scientist-slams-alarmist-religion
Would it not be better to solve real problems instead of chasing
problems that do not exist, creating a profitable climate change industry while
enabling the U.N. bureaucrats to live a lavish lifestyle, jet-setting around the
world to promote their hoax?
