Whether we
have global green religion or a socialist one world government, or a communist
global governance, the end result will be the same – the foundation that guides
globalists will be vastly different from the foundation that guides America,
the U.S. Constitution.
The
Declaration of Independence states that “… All men are created equal … endowed by
their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights … to life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness …”
But
globalists think differently, freedoms and rights are granted by politicians. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
Article 2, states that “Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set
forth in this Declaration.”
According to
the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution we have freedom of speech,
assembly, and religion. At least we did until the all-powerful tech giants
decided to censor conservatives on all their social media platforms.
Globalists,
on the other hand, wrote in the U.N. Covenant on Civil and Political Right,
Article 19, “Freedom of expression may be restricted as approved by law.”
Our Fifth
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that “Private property shall not be
taken for public use without just compensation.” Eminent domain abuses such
powers under the guise of development for the public good. Private property is
indispensable to a free market capitalist economy.
Globalists
see private property as the source of evil and must be prohibited. The U.N.
Conference on Human Settlements of 1976 states that “Private ownership of land
contributes to social injustice; public control of land use is indispensable.” Land
use and property rights are also addressed in U.N. Agenda 21/2030.
Communist
dictators from socialist countries have confiscated their citizens’ private
property in order to make everything equal, equally miserable and poor. They
nationalized factories, confiscated land, wealth, and homes. They vilified people
who owned property as the “bourgeoisie,” fomenting hatred among those who did
not own property.
Mao, Castro,
Ceausescu, Stalin, and other socialist/communist dictators destroyed the middle
class because it owned property – land and real estate. In some countries
farmers and urban property owners were executed to frighten the rest into submission,
and others were sentenced to hard labor in gulags, building roads and
railroads, and excavating ore in mines in order to pay for their sins of bourgeois
ownership.
For the
longest time, the American government “derived its power from the consent of
the governed.” Lately huge changes have taken place and the government
bureaucracy at all levels, local, state, and federal, along with Congress have
taken dictatorial powers without the consent of the governed under the guise of
doing what is good for the “collective.”
Collective,
of course, is a communist code word for we tell you what to do and you obey.
That is exactly what global governance believes, that “the governed derive
their freedoms from the consent of the government."
To prove the
veracity of such a statement, watch what the local, state, and federal government
are forcing us to do, locking down healthy people, forcing healthy citizens to
wear face masks indefinitely, throwing them in jail for non-compliance, fining
them, refusing them entry to grocery stores, malls, and medical clinics, and
destroying small business and the economy for a minute percentage of casualties
from a virus deemed a “pandemic,” forbidding doctors to prescribe potentially
healing drugs that have been in use for 65 years, and pharmacists to dispense
them under the threat of losing their medical and pharma license, firing
doctors who actually cured many patients with drugs the government disapprove
of, while censoring scientific data because it does not agree with the
government narrative. This has never before happened in America on such a huge
scale.
As the late Henry
Lamb said in 2010, “In developed nations, the war against freedom means
removing from individuals the freedom to do and say whatever they wish in the pursuit
of their own happiness, and the freedom to choose the people who have the authority
to make laws. This war is waged with the
counterfeit threat of cataclysmic global warming which requires global
coordinated action. It is waged with trade agreements, treaties, and
propaganda. It is wage with guilt-laden finger-pointing at America’s prosperity
as the reason the rest of the world is in poverty.”
The war
against our freedom is waged by the United Nations, its myriad of
non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and global communists with large endowments
and billions to burn for their cause, paying and using useful idiots within each
country to create havoc and betray their own history and Constitution under the
guise of fighting fascism and desiring to install socialism.
And they
claim, they don’t want the socialism that has failed in all of the countries
where it has been tried for decades and resulted in utter rejection by their
citizens who lived in abject poverty and subjugation, after millions have lost
their lives.
As Dinesh D’Souza
points out in his recent book, these wannabe socialists promise everything on
Earth on the condition that “… you are expected to give up your ownership of
yourself, including your right to keep what is yours, your personal autonomy
and dignity and your independence of mind.” This is just another “lust for
power,” in which “socialism is the ideology of thieves and tyrants.” (United States
of Socialism, Dinesh D’Souza, pp. 9-11)
D’Souza
proposes that the American socialists, who added identity politics
(Latino, black, Asian, Pacific Islander, disabled, LGBTQ) to their platform,
with the social justice component, should call their movement “identity
socialism.”
The young
and old Americans who actually desire socialism express their desire to be
taken care of by the daddy government, a desire of dependency that is stronger
than the desire to be free.
I have
actually been told by older relatives, who now live free of socialism and the
Communist Party, that they wished to return to the country before the 1989
revolution, because today, they have to take care of themselves and it is
hard.
In the old
socialist country, the Communist Party took care of them and paid them an equal
but miserable salary regardless of work participation and effort. And that satisfied
them that they did not have to struggle and work. They did not have freedom but
they had equality of result – they all were paid the same regardless of
effort, skill, and education. The country was ruled by constant dictatorial
decrees that even told them how much food they could consume per day and were
given rations accordingly.
Non-governmental
organizations have spread around the world indoctrinating disaffected
populations and youth to start a new revolution under the banner of “#resist.”
They are socialists advocating the same old failed system but using repackaged
old slogans, promising free technology, an easy life, free education, homes, a
guaranteed income, free health care, child care, and everything else they
desire. It rings hollow as these promises have been made to all the other
failed socialist countries around the globe.
Take Poland’s
case as an example - Lech Walesa, who is now 76, a shipyard electrician, became
the leader of the Solidarity movement in 1980, winner of the Nobel Peace Prize
in 1983, and President of Poland in 1990. He is still in politics demanding
that the government respect the constitution. Why would that be necessary in a post-communist
society? Because the communist corruption never went away, it became part of
the government under different names and the old guard and their neo communist spawn
are still in charge.
Young people
in Poland and elsewhere in the former Iron Curtain countries have been
indoctrinated into the new socialism that is sweeping the globe. I call it hollow
socialism because it is devoid of substance and full of empty promises.
When the
Iron Curtain fell, children of survivors of socialism/communism have gone to
school in the west on Soros and other leftist-founded scholarships. They are
beholden to his philosophy of the new world. His NGOs stepped in and wrote the
school textbooks to match his philosophy of the new world order predicated on
environmentalism and socialism.
Young Polish
women have rallied around the global feminist movement and environmentalism
just like in the west and are #resisting the people who are fighting political
corruption and communism.
The Polish
progressive movement came up with the slogan, “Women and Earth have too much
to bear.” It is not a coincidence that their Manifa, spring march in Gdansk,
copied the western model and advocated for the feminist movement and
environmentalism, carrying LBGTQ flags. Globalists made sure that the movement
spread across the globe, carrying the same signs and the same message.
If one is
still deluded that socialism works if it is tried the “right way” or by the “right
people,” look at Cuba today – it oozes poverty out of the pores of every
decaying building under the leadership of the tyrant comrade Castro; look at
Venezuela today, with the richest oil reserves, yet it cannot feed its people;
and look at North Korea and the starvation of its people. Photographed from
space at night, North Korea looks like a black hole – there are no lights at
all, just complete darkness. And last, but not least, look at the mass poverty
in the cities in America that have been run by a socialist Democrat government for
decades – they resemble third world nations.
