Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed, to me:
I lift my lamp beside the golden door.” - Emma Lazarus
If you
thought global warming scaremongering tactics went away with the most recent failed
prediction for 2015 when we were supposed to be flooded and underwater, with
little polar ice caps left, you would be mistaken.
Writing for
the Washington Post, Michael B. Gerrard, a legal scholar at Columbia University’s
Earth Institute, proposes that we should take in millions upon millions of
refugees that will eventually be displaced by climate change. He said, “We
ruined your country. Welcome to ours.” Playing on Emma Lazarus’ famous quote, he
adds, “Give us your thirsty, your hot, your flooded masses.” Apparently carbon
footprint taxes and wealth redistribution are not enough, we must adopt
progressive social engineering of the planet.
If global
warming average temperatures increase above 3.6 degrees, islands like Kiribati
and the Marshalls and parts of Bangladesh, Pakistan, Egypt, and Vietnam will disappear
underwater, flooded by melting glaciers in the Himalayas and the Andes. And if
people don’t keep their voluntary and non-binding promises to cut CO2 (at the
U.N. Climate summit in Paris in December 2015), “the thermometers could go much
higher.” From Sierra Leone to Ethiopia, land will turn into desert. The heat
will increase violence, ethnic and political tensions, Gerrard said.
Gerrard’s
proposed solution is a pledge “to take on a share of the displaced population
equal to how much each nation has historically contributed to emissions of the greenhouse
gases that are causing this crisis.” http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-38454957.html
Quoting the
World Resources Institute, between 1850 and 2011, the U.S. caused 27 percent of
the world’s carbon dioxide emissions, a trace gas that all plants need to grow.
As a matter of fact, greenhouses provide extra CO2 in their solariums in order to
accelerate plant growth.
The European
Union causes 25 percent of CO2 emissions, China 11 percent, Russia 8 percent,
and Japan 4 percent. It is curious how only industrialized countries are
identified as culprits even though nobody bothers to explain how ice melted
15,000 years ago or who or what caused the Mini Ice Age during the Middle Ages when
there was little or no industrial pollution.
A very
arresting photograph that illustrates this needed massive relocation of humans
from poor countries to wealthy countries in the west shows Biblically dressed
humans wading through chest-deep water and women carrying heavy loads of
possessions on their heads.
Gerrard
suggests that the U.S. should then take in 27 million people to absolve
themselves from the 27 percent CO2 sin. Taking in just one million per year as
we currently do is not enough; it won’t be a popular move but it would be “fair,”
he added. We must take responsibility for the gases we expel into the
atmosphere and pay for the damage. And if the new arrivals want to “re-create
their own communities” within our country, it is only “fair.”
He agrees that
these people could adopt desalination practices and other technology-savvy
agricultural methods but “they typically take a great deal of money and energy,
the very resource we have failed to conserve in the first place.”
The gloom and
doom prediction is that “If we don’t want millions of people seeking heaven
here – or dying while they try – then the United States and other industrialized
countries need to become far more aggressive in cutting their greenhouse gas
emissions.”
“Europe is in a
furor over who will take in” those who are fleeing civil war in Syria and
oppression in Eritrea, said Michael Gerrard. They risk their lives to reach the shores of
European safety and the lure of entitlements.
Might Europeans
be leery of these refugees because of the attacks against innocents, like the
recent one on a Tunisian beach, when Britons on vacation were mowed down with
machine guns by a religionist of peace?
A report released
in May 2015 by NASA indicated that “updated data contradict one of the most
frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the
polar ice caps to recede.” http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/20915-nasa-s-own-data-discredits-its-predictions-of-antarctic-doom
According to
New American, the report did not clarify whether climate warming may be natural
or may be coming in cyclical patterns, or whether global warming is
anthropogenic.
It has been
reported by many scientists who are now called “global warming deniers” that average
temperatures fluctuate, the globe’s climate changes in natural, cyclical
patterns, cooling and warming, causing glaciers and polar ice caps to grow and to
shrink.
NASA scientists
began measuring ice caps by satellite in 1979 during the end of a 30-year
cooling period. The “normal baseline” was thus established during this cooling period
with very thick ice caps. As James Taylor of Forbes wrote,
“The timing
of the 1979 NASA satellite instrument launch could not have been better for
global warming alarmists. The late 1970s marked the end of a 30-year cooling
trend. As a result, the polar ice caps were quite likely more extensive than
they had been since at least the 1920s. Nevertheless, this abnormally extensive
1979 polar ice extent would appear to be the “normal” baseline when comparing
post-1979 polar ice extent.” http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2015/05/19/updated-nasa-data-polar-ice-not-receding-after-all/
Since the
Pope inserted himself into the climate change industry, Dr. Klaus Kaiser wrote
a letter to the “Academicians of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences (PAS)” to
clarify their positions, particularly since they have a significant “influence
on the development of poorer nations and their people” and in light of the fact
that these people “are presently deprived of many of the energy-driven
amenities of the developed countries.”
Dr. Kaiser
pointed out 12 scientifically incontrovertible facts:
1.
Without CO2 in the atmosphere life on earth, plants, animals, humans
could not exist.
2.
For 4.5 billion years atmospheric CO2 on Earth was higher than today.
3.
Photosynthesis converts CO2 to organic matter thus reducing CO2.
4.
Oxygen is produced in the earth’s atmosphere from CO2 via
photosynthesis.
5.
Oceans and fresh water are alkaline, not acidic; photosynthesis also
increases the alkaline property of neutral or acidic water.
6.
Without human influence, kilometres-thick ice shields covering the
northern part of North America and Eurasia 20,000 years ago have melted completely
about 5,000 years ago.
7.
For the most part, during the 15,000-year period mentioned, atmospheric
CO2 stayed at 250 parts per million.
8.
CO2 is not ‘pollution,’ when “the earth’s plants and ocean algae consume
any CO2 stemming from fossil resource use with the same vigour as that emitted
from volcanoes and fumaroles.”
9.
Coal, a source of man-made CO2, provides a lot of the energy needs of
the planet. India and China build a new coal-fired plant each week. Dr. Kaiser
urges countries in Africa to expand their use of fossil fuels.
10. The word “consensus” has zero meaning in
science; look at astronomer Galileo who was exonerated by the Vatican 400 years
after the Catholic Church condemned him as a heretic for his view on
heliocentricity.
11. CO2 is a vital trace gas in the atmosphere,
not a “pollutant.” http://canadafreepress.com/article/73340
The naked truth
is expressed quite clearly in this quote by Warren Moss:
“‘Such impending
catastrophic events – flooding, droughts, heat waves, and higher seas – all allegedly
caused by emissions of greenhouse gases from the burning of fossil fuels,’ have
been used by the global-warming theorists working with federal agencies and the
UN to impose draconian environmental regulations geared to bring the world’s
industrial-based economy to its knees.” http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/20915-nasa-s-own-data-discredits-its-predictions-of-antarctic-doom
No comments:
Post a Comment