Friday, February 26, 2021

Cultural Differences and a 90 Day Fiancé Visa

So many people from around the world fly to America legally after a lengthy bureaucratic process. The lure of a green card and freedom of opportunity are hard to resist, especially when poverty and violence are often their only alternative for the future. Many cross illegally the southern border with the blessing of the Marxist regime in power.

Not long ago, immigrants were required by law to complete tons of paperwork, provide evidence of their health, of their ability to provide for themselves financially, allegiance to our country, interest in becoming Americans, and making our country better. Today these requirements have all but disappeared in the social justice drivel permeating our third world society and leftist government rule.

Immigrants still say that they come to the land of opportunity for freedom but freedom has become illusory as American citizens hear their chains of imaginary freedom rattling every day, ever more loudly, coming from a government out of control.

What immigrants really come for is generous welfare and the hope that they can bring their entire extended families with them. Having left the failed system of socialist governments and tyrannies behind, they come to a place where they have no understanding of this new and fabulously “rich” country. They have no history of democracy in their own countries, it is a totally alien concept. They only understand government dependency and control of their daily lives.

But a small group of foreign nationals with a 90 day fiancé visa come because they have fallen in love online with American citizens who were lucky enough to have been born in the most successful constitutional republic on the planet.

Money grew on trees in America once upon a time, but the trees have withered and died under the weight of constant money printing (quantitative easing), and the luster has tarnished on the famous city on the hill, now a fortress guarded by thousands of heavily armed soldiers and razor wire. As the constitutional republic has vanished after the disastrous 2020 election and year-long economic lockdown, the foreign newcomers will be sadly disappointed.

The people of the highly successful show “90 Day Fiancé” come on a special fiancé visa for an imaginary freedom and prosperity provided by a quick marriage to a lonely American for whom matrimony had been difficult to attain. But technology, dating sites, and the Internet are providing access to other “lonely” people from the most remote corners of the world.

The “freedom” they seek in wealthy America no longer exists but immigrants don’t know that because nobody truly understands economics and government and they are still wearing the rose-colored glasses of the land of plenty, a world painted by Hollywood craftily on celluloid. Immigrants are still coming for the economic prosperity they have seen in movies, movies that bear no resemblance to reality.

Making the audience feel better about themselves, the “90 Day Fiancé” reality show is entertaining to American viewers who have no appreciation or understanding of where these people came from and why, their feelings, values, their tragedies, and religious and marital customs. The fiancés seem narcissistic, materialistic, selfish, greedy, insulting, unappreciative, and braggadocious.

The engagement situations and the drama appear contrived, the dialogues are bizarre at times, and the comedic “reality” moments are very uncomfortable to watch but the emotions are real and so are the vast cultural differences.

Ordinary middle class Americans find themselves in situations where they have to pay for expensive dowries they can hardly afford, in cultures where a buffalo, a cow, sheep, goats, or gold jewelry make all the difference in the world to the parents of the future bride who must survive in subsistence economies and dismal poverty. It is an expression of appreciation and respect for their daughter whom they raised to the age of matrimony and for their standing in the community. Some are required to summarily convert to another religion or be baptized in order to get married.

Americans abroad offend their intended’s families because their lives are so different from our life in America. At the same time, the foreign fiancés insult the loved ones of those they want to marry in America because of their ignorance and misconceptions.

The foreigners are scared, miss their families, do not like the food, do not understand the fine nuances of language, or the American English idiomatic expressions, often resulting in comedic situations for the viewers.

The prospective fiancés become easily insulted and hurt, feeling disrespected and dishonored. They reject the new environment, the culture, the food, the practices, the sounds, the wardrobe, and the way people do things that are so drastically different from those where they grew up.

The immigrant fiancés don’t miss their poverty but they sure miss their countries, their culture, and their immediate families and friends.

They want instant wealth, the proverbial money that grows on trees in America where the streets are paved with gold, but they want to bring their old country, language, their enclave of comfort, their familiar surroundings with them, creating a small homeland within America.

They feel lonely, abandoned, and lash out at their American fiancé who does not seem to understand their feelings, thoughts, and emotions of relinquishing their former lives and everything they ever knew and loved.

Then a few women become pregnant which complicates and aggravates the process of melding two lives from such uniquely different cultures and languages. Adding the substantial age difference in some cases, cause the problems to compound.

Despite the obvious discomfort and pain of real people, American viewers keep watching because the show makes them feel better about themselves. Everybody loves a good and happy ending of a joyful reunion preceded by strife, deceit, terrible misunderstandings, and tears of disappointment.

Wednesday, February 17, 2021

Liberal Media Reactions to Rush Limbaugh's Death

Liberal Media Headlines, reacting to Rush Limbaugh’s death

February 17, 2021

CNBC –  “The Incendiary radio talk show host, dies at age 70”

Yahoo News “Trump mourns Rush Limbaugh’s death on Fox News and repeats false election claims”

USA Today “Rush Limbaugh, conservative radio titan, dies of lung cancer at age of 70”

The New York Times -  “Rush Limbaugh, talk radio’s provocateur, dies at 70”

The Washington Post -  “Rush Limbaugh, conservative radio provocateur and cultural phenomenon, dies at 70”

CNN -  “Rush Limbaugh, conservative media icon, dead at 70, following battle with cancer”

Fox News -  “Twitter liberals celebrate Rush Limbaugh’s death:  ‘I’m glad he lived long enough to get cancer and die’”

NBC News “The political world reacts to Rush Limbaugh’s death”

People “Rush Limbaugh, wildly controversial and wildly popular talk show host, dies”

Axios -  “Rush Limbaugh dies at 70 after battle with lung cancer”

Jezebel -  “Good Riddance” by Emily Alford

Friday, February 12, 2021

Joel Goodman on the Unconstitutional Impeachment

Canada Free Press, February 12, 2021

From the US Constitution:

Article. I. 
Section. 3.
The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

Article. II.
Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Article I
Section 8.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

Not an impeachment and is merely an unconstitutional proceeding

Therefore, if the Chief Justice is not presiding, the “Impeachment” is on its face not an impeachment and is merely an unconstitutional proceeding.

The Republican leaders should merely have motioned to have the Chief Justice present, and until such time he was brought to the Capitol, the Republicans should have disrupted the proceedings.

If this is not an Impeachment of a President because the Chief Justice is not present, and because it is not constitutional because the President is no longer in office, it is merely a political trial and in essence any limitation of Trump’s future political activities must be considered a Bill of Attainder.

I would assume that the Republicans (except for the six RINO’s who supported the impeachment)  could have left the chamber and let the Senate vote 56 to 0 to convict, and then President Trump could have appealed his conviction all the way to the Supreme Court to have the vote overturned by the Court.

I see no purpose in having added any credence to the Congressional Democrats’ attempts to once again demean President Trump. 

Where Is The Chief Justice?--- Canada Free Press


Thursday, February 11, 2021

From Technocracy News - Maskne is Real

 Maskne is only one side effect of wearing masks for extended periods, including mouth sores, thrush, staph and sinus infections, eczema, fainting, headaches, dry cough, asthma and shortness of breath. Psychological effects include anxiety, claustrophobia, depression, isolation and suicide.

All of these conditions are real and result in human suffering. But now, Technocrat scientists are telling us to wear two masks instead of one. ⁃ TN Editor

Masks are now a part of our everyday lives. For some people, what’s underneath the mask is giving them issues they’ve never had before. It seems dermatologists are seeing more patients suffering from mask-related acne — or, in this case, “maskne.”

It’s not what our skin is used to, having a piece of material covering a majority of our face, trapping moisture and bacteria against our skin. “(There’s) so much more irritation from the mask, whether it’s causing friction, moisture, the heat,” Dr. Sarah Cannon of Cannon Dermatology tells WJZ-TV in Baltimore.

Cannon says many patients who have battled acne in the past are having flare-ups. “We’re seeing a lot of new cases of patients coming in with new-onset acne who have never had acne before,” she notes.

Cannon suggests proper hydration, keeping makeup off the skin that is covered and washing your mask after each use.

The discomfort is one thing, but how you feel about yourself is another. Julie Newton is an aesthetician at Spa on The Boulevard and says her appointments have been filling up with people who need some TLC for their facial skin. “It’s definitely something everybody is struggling with right now,” Newtson says. “It’s not something to really be embarrassed about, either, especially if you’re looking to get help. That’s why we’re here.”.....

https://www.technocracy.news/dermatologist-maskne-is-real/

Current Unemployment Data

The official unemployment rate hit 14.7% in April, its highest since the Great Depression, when it exceeded 25%.

The actual figure today may be closer to, or even above, 20%. (June 2020)

Unemployment today vs. the Great Depression: How do the eras compare? (cnbc.com)

The current U.S. unemployment rate is 6.7% for January 2021, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) said in its monthly report on Friday. (Feb. 5, 2021)

Here are the highs and lows of unemployment rates in all 50 states with the years listed.

Current Unemployment Rates for States and Historical Highs/Lows (bls.gov)

In 2020 Nevada had 30% unemployment, Michigan 24%, Hawaii 23.8%, Indiana 17.4%, Illinois 17.2%, and California 16.4%. Technically, Nevada, Hawaii, and Michigan were in a great depression in 2020 with Indiana, Illinois, and California in close following.

We have a labor force of 164.6 million Americans. (February 2020)

Marketplace reported 30 million Americans on unemployment benefits in August 2020. If you do the percentage, the national unemployment rate then was 18.22%.

Forbes reported 18.4 million Americans on unemployment benefits in January 2021. If you do the numbers, the actual national unemployment rate is 11.17%, not the BLS reported rate of 6.7%  - massaging the numbers to make things appear better than they really are.

Tuesday, February 9, 2021

The Corrupt Communist Regime and the News Media

In his cold war classic, Red Horizons, Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest defector from a communist regime, wrote that “the Romanian revolution of 1989 was the first one in history to have been started by the news media and won by the television cameras.”

The misery and starvation subsistence that Romanians had to endure for decades, while the media, political apparatchiks and the Ceausescus rolled in the lap of luxury, finally exploded into revolt.

The people did not have arms; they had been confiscated decades earlier. But the revolt leaders, as Pacepa described it, “were able to mobilize virtually the entire citizenry by seizing the television station, making it their headquarters, and then broadcasting their fight against the hated dictator live, day and night.”

But even so, the revolution would have never succeeded had it not been for the military forces who had joined the people’s revolt. The proletariat had had enough suffering and misery during the quarter of a century of Ceausescu’s oppressive communist regime.

Despite his “large, vicious, well trained, and heavily armed security force,” and despite his underground bunkers and tunnels, he lost his total control of the nation in a few days. The self-described “mother and father of the nation” were whimpering during their arrest while attempting to escape by helicopter.

The shoemaker and his uneducated wife, who awarded herself degrees she never earned from schools she never attended, were finally deposed, summarily tried by a military tribunal, and sentenced to death by firing squad. The media was no longer there to lionize their diabolical tyranny.

For decades after World War II, the communist propaganda machine of the most oppressive regime in Eastern Europe was kept alive and enhanced through forced communist education, parades, posters, publications, poetry, art, the dear leader’s cult of personality marches, a well-oiled propaganda machine, books, pamphlets, and the powerful official Romanian media that churned out tons of lies, disinformation, and manufactured history.

After the much-hated dictator Ceausescu and his wife were hurriedly executed on Christmas 1989, the very next day a suspiciously “independent” newspaper Adevarul (The Truth) published, for the first time for the repressed population, the painful reality of the vicious and corrupt regime they had just survived. People stood in lines for hours to buy the paper. After all, they were used to standing in huge lines every day to buy food that would help their families survive another day.

When Gen. Pacepa defected to the U.S., rumor had it that Ceausescu had a nervous breakdown and wanted him killed immediately. He did not want the rest of the world to find out the depth of his crimes against humanity.

Ceausescu ran a police state that Soviets would have envied.  All telephones were fitted with a “high-tech microphone,” and people had to submit samples of handwriting in case they decided to publish unauthorized hand-written pamphlets that would embarrass the regime and reveal the truth.  All typewriters had to be registered with the police.  Letters and packages were opened and read. Package contents were checked; many were confiscated as contraband and used by the loyal apparatchiks as spoils of war. Nobody bothered to reseal correspondence or deliver mailed packages that were emptied of western goods and stolen. Informers had to work hard to follow their marks’ every move. And yet, this type of spying seems juvenile and pales in comparison to today’s technology that spies on us and causes the erasure of any modicum of privacy we think we have.

While people starved and stood in lines for hours on end each day to buy food, Ceausescu’s son, Nicu, a pathetic and worthless drunk, broke unopened Johnny Walker Black Label bottles against the wall in his parents’ fancy home when he got bored, laughing when broken bottles splashed liquid on the walls, the expensive carpets, and furniture. The house maids had to clean any evidence of his outrageous behavior.

Sadly, Pacepa remarked that, even though the evil dictator and his wife were gone, the system that brought him to power and enabled him to stay in power was very much alive, ready to produce another Ceausescu when necessary. And the media was there to help.

Unfortunately, people were temporarily lulled into a false sense of freedom, security, and peace. Giving them better living conditions and the food they wanted for almost three decades, went a long way to quell any dissent to the new “free” regime. Pacepa wrote then, “In the absence of any organized opposition and democratic framework, Romania’s communist structure of government remains essentially in place…”

That is how, overnight, the former communist handlers, in the confusion and vacuum of uncertainty that ensued after the dictator’s execution, became rich beyond their dreams, and made fortunes stealing money and state property and selling it to the highest bidders before anyone woke up to take account of the theft. It was eventually stopped but not before the massive plunder underway became permanent.

December 1989


 

Saturday, January 30, 2021

A Dark Day When America Transforms into Marx’s Vision

Karl Heinrich Marx, a notoriously lazy German who existed with his family as a welfare case of his rich friends, might be surprised that his academic thoughts and ideas shook the 20th century to its core and enslaved millions of people across the world, creating monstrous regimes that killed 100 million of their own citizens for their dissension and unwillingness to accept a proletarian society that dispossessed humans of their own property, land, and freedoms, and turned them into serfs to the omnipotent socialist state imposed and run by the Communist Party.

Marx might be even more surprised that such a failed societal and economic model would be resurrected in the 21st century in the least likely society to accept Marx’s ideas, the United States, the beacon of freedom for the rest of the world.

Marx’s 1848 pamphlet, The Communist Manifesto, has been resuscitated today by brainwashed American generations who want socialism but have no understanding of what it entails. They hear the word “free” everything and that is enough for them to support such an oppressive form of society and disastrous economic model.

Marx’s pamphlet was written as a critique against capitalism even though he and his family shamelessly lived off his benefactors’ capitalist income. His outrage against the exploitation of capitalism as he saw it, is reminiscent of the youth of today who protest capitalism in the streets and want it replaced with socialism, while holding electronic products and living a lifestyle produced by an abundant capitalist economy.

Marx divided society into the ruling class and the working class, describing the proletariat as an exploited and oppressed segment of society by the ruling class. The working class is forced to sell their labor to exist and survive. It would be hard for the proletariat to find rich supporters like Marx had. He did not work a productive day in his life but lived off the generosity of his friends, instead of honestly providing for his wife and numerous children.

Marx talked about “eternal truths such as Freedom and Justice,” hence the cries of today’s youth for Social Justice, concepts they barely understand or can explain. 

Marx wrote that communism would abolish these eternal truths found in all states of society, “it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience.” (p. 92, The Communist Manifesto)

The evil “bourgeoisie” that owned the capital will be dispossessed by its “political supremacy” in order that all instruments of production will be centralized in the hands of the state and the proletariat will be organized as the ruling class. At that time, the total productive forces will be increased as quickly as possible.  (p. 93, The Communist Manifesto)

As the old social order is being destroyed and class distinctions disappeared, old conditions of production replaced with new ones, and utopian “association” will emerge with “free development” of all.

What were the ten tenets of Marx’s Communist Manifesto?

1.       “Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.”

When the Bolsheviks marched in with the Soviet Army into Romania, the society at large strongly opposed their idea of giving up land and private property to the state for the “public good.” Romania had a thriving economy under the monarchy and people were making an honest living on their own farms, small factories, small businesses. Using coercion, torture, and murder, the Bolsheviks wrested farms, houses, factories, hotels, private buildings, and stores from their rightful owners and turned everything over to the state which was now run by the Communist Party made up of a small group of revolutionaries. As they gained more power, they used this newly acquired state property as their fiefdom and awarded and rewarded their apparatchiks with other people’s homes and wealth. In typical fashion, socialists steal by decrees until they run out of other people’s wealth, money, and property.

2.       “A heavy progressive and graduated income tax.”

The masses are taxed until there is nothing left to tax and people have a bare minimum to exist on.

3.       “Abolition of all right of inheritance.”

Nothing is yours; it belongs to the state. My grandparents lost everything to the first round of Communist Party confiscation: land, the farm, farm implements, gold coins, family jewelry, savings, and any cash on hand or personal possessions in the home, including a mantel clock. When they died, the home they had lived in became the property of the state, the six children could not dispose of it as they wished.

4.       “Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.”

When I emigrated legally to the U.S., everything I owned was confiscated and I was only allowed to leave with two suitcases of clothes and memorabilia.

When my father (a staunch anti-communist) died, all his savings and possessions, including my books, were confiscated by the state. When my mom defected to the U.S., all her savings and possessions were confiscated by the socialist state as well. To add insult to injury, my parents, who worked since they were 18 years old, 43 years for my dad and 30 years for my mom, never received their pensions, it was also confiscated by the state. To this day, the state has made no effort to redress the situation to my mom. And it was not for lack of trying. I have even asked the prime minister in person.

5.       “Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.”

People living in socialist societies had to save their money to purchase anything of value. Credit was seldom given by the only bank and the interest rates were confiscatory, as much as 50% in some cases to discourage borrowing. People would borrow from family members and return the money over time with an agreed upon but much lower interest rate.

6.       “Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.”

State’s priorities involved the improvement of the lives of those in control, the communist oligarchs, who had amassed vast wealth confiscated from the population. Communication was state owned and controlled and so was transportation. We could travel by rickety busses or trains; few people owned cars as they were prohibitively expensive and the driving test quite difficult to pass.

Few owned telephones, it took 14 years to install a phone line from the time a petition was filed, and phones were tapped all the time. Letters were always opened and read by the state. There were few newspapers and a couple of magazines, all content controlled by the state. Rural residents used the party newspaper for toilet paper as it was always difficult to find, even though the country had vast forests. Nothing was published without the approval of the Communist Party and its censors. In America today we have censorship by a handful of tech giants, something nobody had envisioned in the country where freedom of speech is guaranteed in the Constitution. But then we had a Constitution under the socialist regime too, but the overlords thumbed their noses at it and kept changing it to suit their rhetoric.

7.       “Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of wastelands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.”

The infamous Five-Year Plans issued by the Communist Party was seldom fulfilled because it was irrational and unreasonable, not based on sound economics. The Party concentrated on developing the country through heavy industrial investments and projects at the expense of the proletariat’s living standards who were pathetic when compared to other countries.

8.       “Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.”

Every able-bodied adult had a job with minimum pay established by the state, nobody was idle and on welfare unless they were sick or giving birth. People of all ages, including school children, were forced to do volunteer labor in agriculture, planting or harvesting crops, cleaning streets, and planting grass and flowers.

9.       “Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.”

Farmers, whose land had been confiscated, had to commute to nearby cities to find employment in factories, and their wives and children tended to a small garden by their homes to eat. Some young but mostly old men and women were left behind to farm the state’s co-operatives.

Farmers were crowded in homes next to each other in their tightly packed villages or were forcefully moved into concrete bloc apartments in the city so that state-owned co-operative farms could be established with their joined lands.

10.   “Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc., etc.”

When I emigrated to the U.S., I had to reimburse the omnipotent state for the education I had received up to that point even though we were supposed to receive a free education, including college. But nothing was free unless it benefited the mighty state.

As children we had to labor in the state’s fields to dig up potatoes, onions, pick grapes, pears, apples, and plums. It was volunteer work, and we were taken out of school two weeks in the fall and a few weeks in the spring.

The retread Socialist Democrats of America today claim that they “own the future.” The question remains, how dark is this future going to be and how long are the other Americans going to accept this evil darkness?