I am certainly not
advocating surrender, freedom is worth fighting for, and we are the last
bastion of freedom in America. If America goes, so does the rest of the world.
Other nations want us to fight because they’ve given up.
I was told by a very
conservative ladies’ group that we must be careful not to use the word Agenda
21 lest we are labeled “loons.” In other words, let’s self-censor and enable
the Agenda 21 to march on unrestrained because we have to appear that we are trusty
team players.
Having survived communism
and seeing all the elements of global governance, I am not going to mince
works. I have already been labeled “aggender” because I have ample research evidence
that Agenda 21 exists, a “denier” because I do not believe in global warming,
it is a manufactured crisis by the Club of Rome, IPCC, and other like-minded
environmentalist-based groups and NGOs, based on verbal agreement called “consensus,”
and faulty and manipulated data. I was called “islamophobe” because I gave a speech
on Agenda 21 on the same stage that another person used when speaking about
Sharia Law – that makes me guilty by proximity. I am a “racist” and “bigot”
because I am definitely against amnesty and illegal immigration.
Nationally syndicated radio
talk show hosts have finally started speaking about Agenda 21 elements – they describe
seemingly unrelated components of it and thus ordinary people, who do not have
the time to do research, have difficulty connecting the dots into the larger
picture. I connected many of the stories in my book, “U.N. Agenda 21:
Environmental Piracy.” http://www.amazon.com/U-N-Agenda-21-Environmental-ebook/dp/B009WC6JXO/ref=sr_1_1?s=digital-text&ie=UTF8&qid=1379601599&sr=1-1&keywords=un+agenda+21%3A+Environmental+piracy
Survivors of communism
know and are speaking out. A political refuge from Romania appealed to the St.
Lucie County Commissioners in Florida at a recent meeting about the U.N.
environmental regionalist Seven50 plans for Florida. “I do not come here to
lose my freedom; I beg you – get out of the Seven/50. Do not destroy our
Freedom.” www.westernjournalism.com/author/suzanne-eovaldi/
Citizens vociferously
opposed such regionalism. “I am opposed to Seven50… to the loss of our property
rights by U.N. Agenda 21, the new world order communist Marxist project.” According
to Suzanne Eovaldi, a long line of speakers and refugees from former communist
countries pleaded with “local elected officials to reject the takeover of
Florida’s private property.” One speaker wondered, “Why am I arguing for what
has always been my right… for all that made America great.”
Large grants from HUD and
the Obama administration divides the country into 11 nationwide regions,
including the east coast of Florida. The Seven50 Regionalism Plan has already
been adopted in the Gore triangle counties south of St. Lucie and Indian River
counties. Vero Beach, IRC rejected the plan based on a “vertical authority flow
chart” controlled by unelected federal bureaucrats influenced by globalist
non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who plan to “stack-and-pack 200-foot dwelling
spaces” and move citizens off their hard-earned private property. My family and
I had experience with such social engineering and confiscation of property,
forcibly being relocated off our land into tiny high rise apartments. Life in
the 9-story concrete block apartments into which we were moved under protest
and duress was very hard, especially since we did not have elevators to climb
to our tiny cubicles. Sharing one bathroom and one kitchen with another family
of four in a 600 square foot apartment was dehumanizing.
Suzanne Eovaldi describes
the typical stack-and-pack living quarters in the 200 square foot aPodments building
in Sammamish, Washington. Resident Judy Green “shares the kitchen with seven
other tenants on the second floor.” To get to her loft cubicle, she must climb
six flights of stairs in the absence of elevators. Cars are not allowed because
of global warming. The micro-apartments are the size of a hotel room and rent
for $600-900 per month. The
micro-housing units increase the population density of the area tremendously. http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020845443_apodmentscitycouncilxml.html
The Seven50 is the
Southeast Florida Regional Partnership of non-elected bureaucrats who have a “vision”
for the rest of us, a vision driven by ICLEI and our own government to control
land and water use, plants and animals, energy, construction, humans. Local
control is gone and the funding comes from federal agencies doling out taxpayer
dollars. In other words, we are losing our own sovereignty to the U.N. with our
own taxpayer dollars.
The government knows best
what “Best Practices” counties must adopt and these practices are not defined,
they will be developed on a bureaucratic whim later. There will be changes to
the counties’ desired low density character and scale. The bureaucrats will
impose “sustainable development” and “equitable communities.” Smart Growth is
certainly the linchpin of Agenda 21. The American Coalition 4 Property Rights
explains on its website why the Seven50 Regional plan must be stopped with its
Sustainable Urbanism, and the Smart Code solution to urban sprawl. Regionalism
will fundamentally alter the make-up of our society and of our property rights
or lack thereof. http://nomoreunelectedbureaucrats.com/
Rush Limbaugh explained in
his September 12, 2013 monologue, “The Unintended Consequences of Liberal
Social Engineering,” what “equitable communities” and Smart Growth are.
Limbaugh described the
failed bussing social engineering project in the 1970s when kids were forcibly bussed
around the country to schools outside of their neighborhoods, as far away as 45
minutes. Liberals used the power of government to force people where to send
their kids to school because liberals did not like where Americans chose to
live – they were too racist.
Rush Limbaugh said, “Social
engineering is on the verge of being imposed on entire neighborhoods, adults
and children alike.” The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) will
dismantle local zoning and force people to move into certain areas in order to
achieve what they consider “racial, economic, and ethnic diversity.” This is “nationalizing
neighborhoods” on a grand scale. This is done for our “own good and to achieve
utopia.”
If local governments do
not comply with the HUD mandate, their federal funding will be cut. HUD has
already told Westchester County, New York, that “local governments will have to
take meaningful action to further the goals identified. If they fail to comply,
HUD can cut federal funding. HUD has told Westchester County that any limits on
the size, type, height, and density of buildings are ‘restrictive practices.’”
By obliterating zoning
regulations, Rush Limbaugh said, we will have neighborhoods by government
quota. The elites, of course, will be excluded from this social engineering
scheme.
The Obama administration
and liberals in general are fascinated by mass transit, buses, subways, trains
and do not like suburbia, they wish to dismantle it. Incidentally, Agenda 21
wants to do away with suburbia and move people off their land into high rise, highly
dense settlements in large cities, accessed by public transportation, five
minute walk from work, school, and play, with no access to cars and parking.
Mass transit limits our
mobility yet our country’s freedom, development, and achievement was defined by
our unbounded mobility. If the government controls mass transit, they will
control the routes, they will control where we can and cannot go, hence the
off-limits lands to human access, lands given back to wilderness.
Rush Limbaugh pointed out
that “HUD’s power grab is based on the mistaken belief that zoning and
discrimination are the same, zoning is disguised discrimination.”
Milennials, the products
of years of liberal education, “do not wish to own cars.” They’ve been
brainwashed by environmentalist teachers into believing that cars are bad for
the environment, causing pollution and thus global warming.
Rush Limbaugh explained in
his September 17, 2013 monologue, “Global Warming Scientists: We Were Wrong,”
the connection of all the chess pieces in this global game based on a climate
hoax. He correctly identifies IPCC as the “repository for the hoax” and how the
“University of East Anglia in Britain… and this guy at Penn State with his fake
hockey stick graph, these guys all reported to the IPCC (Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change). All of these models that they constructed over the
years predicted calamity by now, and the calamity never happened.”
By 2005 we should have
been destroyed by global warming. Oppenheimer said in 1985 that we had 20 years
if we didn’t reduce greenhouse gases. We
are still here. All these environmentalists and the IPCC use the global warming
excuse to “justify increasing fossil fuel taxes and subsidies for ‘renewable
energy.’”
Even though IPCC
scientists admit that their “computers may have exaggerated the effect of
increased carbon emissions on world temperatures – and not taken enough notice
of natural variability,” it did not stop National Geographic from dedicating
its entire September 2013 issue to global warming. A Statue of Liberty
submerged half way into the ocean is superimposed by the large title in capital
letters, “RISING SEAS, Mapping a World without Ice.”
Satellite photos of Arctic
ice taken by NASA in August 26, 2012 and August 15, 2013 show a 60 percent
increase in the polar ice sheet, even though environmental modelers warned us
six years ago that the North Pole would have melted by now. Nobel Prize winner
Al Gore had cited U.S. climate scientist Wieslaw Maslowski in his December 2007
acceptance speech, “Earth has a fever,” that the North Pole would be “ice-free
by 2013.” He was wrong by 920,000 square miles. The polar ice cap is the largest
since 2006. http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/wrong-al-gore-predicted-arctic-summer-ice-could-disappear-2013#sthash.EQBSeKbY.RGnPeQoU.dpuf
Al Gore’s “planetary
emergency and the threat to the survival of our civilization,” a.k.a. global
warming hoax, has turned into billions of dollars lucrative schemes for many
global warming alarmists.
The global warming crowd
keeps crowing that we have the power to destroy the planet. Rush says, very
wisely, “We don’t have any such power. We couldn’t do this if we wanted to.”
Deniers like us are targeted for character assassination because we are interfering
with the leftist effort to expand “the size and role of government” controlling
the nanny state.
A wise caller explains
that the models used to claim global warming utilize cloud cover as the biggest
variable in determining what temperatures are going to be. Cloud cover is very
unpredictable, clouds form and dissipate so quickly, and it can swing the
models one way or the other. The computer models are also based on very large
grids and inadequate to make the global warming predictions claimed.
When the data was fudged
because it did not match existing models and the environmentalist agenda, a big
scandal broke in Great Britain at the University of East Anglia. We are often
denied access to documents, information, and data, we are supposed to trust
these people because they are the only ones who can interpret the data, and we
are too dumb to understand. We are not allowed to testify in Congress, and when
we are, we are shouted down.
Rush Limbaugh said, “The
political movement funds these people [global warming scientists] with
donations if they produce the right outcome in their research. This movement
converted a bunch of just every day, ordinary meteorologists into huge proselytizers
for it.” All it takes is 105 degrees Fahrenheit in July and people are claiming
global warming.
A local commercial ran for
many years, featuring a very shady looking salesman who always ended his sales pitch
with the words, “I wouldn’t lie to you!” That is how I see the manmade global
warming claims manufactured by environmental alarmists whose interests of power
and control are at stake. When we do diligent research and uncover the whole
U.N. Agenda 21 cabal, we become right wing nut conspiracy theorists who wear tin
foil hats to prevent Marxist progress from happening.
