Showing posts with label Little Ice Age. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Little Ice Age. Show all posts

Friday, April 20, 2018

Bacon and a Year Without Summer

Photo credit: www.pofta-buna.com
I’m placing the thickly sliced uncured bacon in the pan and, when it begins to sizzle, the marvelous aroma fills the house. It is a memory from my childhood when Grandma Elena would render bacon fat into lard in her tiny kitchen. It was a preservative for chunks of pork she would seal with wax in glass jars that would feed us for an entire year. It was stored in the cellar, the dank, damp, and constantly cool place. We did not need refrigerators and could not have afforded one anyway.

My dad eventually saved enough money when I was in 12th grade and bought a small refrigerator for our tiny apartment in the city. It was empty most of the time because we did not have food to store, mom shopped daily and we ate what she purchased, no leftovers. We would cool a watermelon in the fridge in summertime or keep a small glass bottle of milk if we were lucky enough to have found the liter bottles sold in the government-run dairy stores.

Like everything else, shelves were bare as soon as the morning delivery was put on sale and the long line of shoppers dissipated with their laden expandable jute string shopping bags.  In winter time we had the window sill for cool storage with plenty of ice and snow.

I could have this bacon now every day if I wanted to but I don’t have to because I believe that I can find it any day in the grocery store and I don’t have to fight others for it like they do in socialist Venezuela.

We trust blindly that our local stores will always have a good stock of food every day. As a realist, however, I know that most grocery stores have enough stock for three days, but who wants to have negative thoughts when this country is so rich and the shelves are a cornucopia of abundance? We have fewer and fewer farmers, less than 3 percent, feeding 330 million. Nobody ever starves in America today but could they in case of terrible inclement weather?

What if we would experience another year like 1816, also known as the Year without a Summer?  Major food shortages occurred across the Northern Hemisphere due to the massive 1815 eruption of Mount Tambora in the Dutch East Indies, preceded by the 1814 eruption of Mayon in the Philippines. (Oppenheimer, Clive, 2003. "Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the largest known historic eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815.” Progress in Physical Geography. 27 (2): 230–259. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1191/0309133303pp379ra

Volcanic winters are not something new, they have occurred across the millennia but nobody was keeping track then. Evidence of inclement weather disasters and probable food shortages can be found, among others, in studies of soil strata and in ice core samples.

Reports in the U.S. described a persistent “dry fog which turned reddish and dimmed the sunlight - it could not be dispersed by wind or rainfall.”  Scientists termed it a “stratospheric sulfate aerosol veil.” It affected crops, particularly at higher elevations such as Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont, New York, and even the garden state, New Jersey. In early June snow fell in Albany, New York, and in Maine. New Jersey’s crops were damaged by five continuous nights of frost.

Those who push the idea of an anthropogenic global warming conveniently leave out the historical data of the Vostok ice core samples taken by Russian, American, and French scientists. Global warmists have now switched to climate change which all sides agree that it does occur but it is not necessarily man-made. We should not confuse deliberate environmental degradation and lack of conservation of natural resources with CO2 gases emitted by humans and animals existing and breathing. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ice-core-data-help-solve/

The Little Ice Age that lasted approximately 500 years is another important occurrence worth mentioning that the global warmists conveniently leave out from their narrative. It caused tremendous agricultural hardship and famine in Europe from around the thirteen hundreds to the eighteen hundreds, affecting the Norse settlers and even Napoleon’s campaign in Russia in 1812 where they encountered such an unusual bitter-cold winter and a lack of food for which they were ill-prepared.  The culprit of the severe cold stretching over centuries was the diminished solar flare activity, a solar minimum, not CO2.
Long winters are not unusual in Russia or in the United States for that matter, it is the inability to have a long enough and warm enough growing season in order to produce sufficient food for its population.

Climatologists who argue when this cooling period actually began, dubbed Little Ice Age by Francois E. Matthes, are more definitive that it ended around 1850-1870. https://www.history.com/news/little-ice-age-big-consequences
In our 20th century communist society, it was not the surprise of weather changes that we had to worry so much about but the unwise economic and agricultural central planning that bore no resemblance to reality or to the ability of humans to produce what was ordered and the fact that most food was used for export in order to buy industrial equipment needed for development. People starved, foreigners ate well, and the communist party had its factories that produced goods that nobody wanted to buy because they were so poorly made.

But we had bacon thanks to my grandparents who always raised a pig for Christmas slaughter, a beautiful animal that kept four-five families alive through winter, spring, summer, and fall until the next year.  If it was not for grandma raising this pig, raising chickens and ducks for eggs, keeping a cow for milk, and planting a garden, several families would have starved because there was not enough food provided by government in groceries stores for the size of the population. Communists do not recognize the law of supply and demand and are not particularly adept at planning centralized economies based loosely on Marxist ideology.

 

 

Sunday, February 3, 2013

How Many People Can the Planet Sustain?

As a college student I was fascinated by David Attenborough’s Living Planet. He was my hero. I was certainly disappointed when I learned that he has joined the chorus of global warming alarmists who turned into climate change scaremongers when it became evident that the planet has actually cooled in the last sixteen years. Of course the planet’s climate has changed for billions of years and it has nothing to do with human activity or their existence..

Climate change environmentalists choose to mix catastrophic weather events with climate whenever it is convenient to their message, so long as there is a progressive faux science “consensus” and their global warming/climate change guru, Al Gore, agrees. Never mind that science is based on fact not on “consensus.” And the facts and data must not be manufactured to fit political agendas.

In a Malthusian style, David Attenborough describes humans in less than favorable words – plague, hordes. “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now.” (Radio Times as quoted by The Telegraph)

Thomas Robert Malthus wrote in 1798 in “An Essay on the Principle of Population” that population growth would prevent advancement to utopian society: "The power of population is indefinitely greater than the power in the earth to produce subsistence for man.” He was certainly proven wrong.

A patron of the Optimum Population Trust, Sir David Attenborough speaks against “the frightening explosion in human numbers” and the need for sex education and voluntary ways of limiting population in developing countries. Another patron of note is Dame Jane Morris Goodall, the famous anthropologist who studied chimpanzees for 45 years.

The Optimum Population Trust website (http://www.populationmatters.org/) displays a world population clock and promotes a sustainable future, sustainable consumption, family planning, conservation of the natural world, ending population growth, gender equality, and living within one’s means. Sustainability, as they see it, has to “address poverty, gender inequality, natural resource limits, climate change, biodiversity loss, and population density. These goals are also part of the U.N. Agenda 21.   

Sir Attenborough provides Ethiopia as a convenient example of famine caused by “too many people there” who cannot support themselves. However, as societies become more civilized, better educated, technologically advanced, and richer, do they not produce smaller families who live longer and healthier lives?

“Attenborough seems to have a Malthusian dislike of the human race.” (Harry Mount, The Telegraph, January 22, 2013)

We are not a plague on the earth. We have actually eradicated the plague that killed millions in the Middle Ages and we have helped billions of humans double their life expectancy.

Proponents of global warming conveniently forget that from 1350 until around 1850, Europe went through a period called the Little Ice Age – this was during a time when human industrial scale activity barely existed.

Napoleon’s retreating Grande Armée encountered a terrible cold in Russia and many soldiers perished from exposure to these extreme temperatures, as well as starvation because the much shorter growing seasons made it impossible to have enough food for an invading army, coupled with typhus spread by lice. In 2001, thousands of skeletons were found in Vilnius, Lithuania, the remains of Napoleon’s soldiers. (http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/pandemics/2012/12/napoleon_march_to_russia_in_1812_typhus_spread_by_lice_was_more_powerful.html)

The Optimum Population Trust boasts that “Our vision is of a global population size enabling decent living standards and environmental sustainability.” Who is going to decide the optimum population number, how will the excess population be disposed of, what are the parameters of decent living standards, and of environmental sustainability? Who chose these people to be the arbiters of human life and death, caretakers of the planet, and controllers of our happiness and of the future? Must we adopt the cruel and murderous one-child policy of China?

The Club of Rome and United Nations with all their wealthy and famous patrons and supporters are the arbiters of our population size, our right to inhabit the planet, and the life style we have chosen for ourselves given our modern society. “A reasonable estimate for an industrialized world society at the present North American material standard of living would be 1 billion. At the more frugal European standard of living, 2 to 3 billion would be possible.” (United Nations, Global Biodiversity Assessment)

The Club of Rome is less generous with its demographic estimation, …"the resultant ideal sustainable population is hence more than 500 million but less than one billion.” (Goals of Mankind)

The Club of Rome, in its search for a common enemy to fit their agenda in order to control the world’s population through the United Nations, came up with the idea that “pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine would fit the bill and are caused by human intervention.” The sad thing is that low information humans believe everything without questioning.