Showing posts with label Jamestown. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jamestown. Show all posts

Sunday, February 11, 2024

Jamestown Settlement, 417 Years Ago

     

     On the 400 year-anniversary (quadricentennial) of the Jamestown settlement on the coast of Virginia, Queen Elizabeth II toured its museum on May 4, 2007, to commemorate the first permanent English settlement in the New World.

     Three English ship, carrying 144 men and boys, set sail on December 20, 1606, bound for Virginia. Sailing the favored southerly course across the Atlantic Ocean, using trade winds and making stops at numerous islands to resupply, after more than four months at sea and 6,000 miles in very cramped quarters with unsanitary conditions, the English finally saw the Virginia coast.

    

Share of the Virginia Company

A reconnaissance party was sent ashore while the ships dropped anchor at Cape Henry. A small band of Indians attacked the scouting party and they retreated to the ships with two wounded men.

    


That night the Virginia Company orders were opened and the names of the seven men appointed to the colony’s council were read.

    


Several days later the settlers raised a cross and named the cape in honor of Prince Henry, the son of James I. This ceremony confirmed English claims to Virginia established twenty years earlier by the Roanoke colony.

     But England’s first successful colony in America was not established by the English government, but by a privately owned business called the Virginia Company of London. The investors hoped to profit from the potential wealth of the New World. In 1606 King James granted the organizers of the company exclusive rights to settle in Virginia.

     The Company was planning to find wealth, to convert the Indians to Christianity, to create jobs for the English unemployed, to seek a route to the Orient, and to tap whatever resources were found in the New World.

     “A charter granted land to two branches of the Virginia Company – the London branch was to plant a colony near the Chesapeake Bay, while the Plymouth branch was granted land in the New England area. The Company paid all the costs of establishing each colony, and in return owned all land and resources there and required everyone to work as a servant to the Company.”

     According to the museum, the investors were called “adventurers” who purchased shares of company stock to “help finance the costs of establishing overseas settlements or trading posts.”

     The money from the sale of stocks bought ships, supplies, and recruited laborers. The eventual profits were to be shared among all of the “adventurers.”

     One share of stock in Virginia Company cost 12 pounds 10 shillings, which represented more than six months’ wage of an ordinary worker. Shareholders could buy stocks individually or in groups. Almost 1700 people bought shares and the investors were found among people of different classes, occupations, wealthy women, guilds, towns, and cities. Merchants, especially from London, joined before 1610 and purchased more than half of the investments. As profits failed to materialize, the London merchants lost their interest even though they were the driving force of England’s expansion. Shares in New World companies, including the Virginia Company, were advertised in pamphlets, plays, sermons, broadsheets in order to raise awareness in the New World investments.

     The largest shareholder in the Virginia Company of London was the Third Baron De La Warr, Thomas West, who was appointed Lord Governor and Captain General of Virginia for life in 1610. When he arrived in Jamestown in June 1610, he was able to save the struggling colony from being abandoned. Thomas West was the cousin of Queen Elizabeth I and a member of the Privy Councils of both Elizabeth I and James I.

     In poor health, Thomas West returned to England in 1611. Lord and Lady de la Warr were Pocahontas’ sponsors for her court presentation to King James and Queen Anne on January 6, 1617.

     Thomas West died in 1618 while attempting to return to Virginia to resume his duties as governor.

 

Tuesday, June 25, 2019

Jamestown Foray into a Communist Failure

William Bradford
Our U.S. socialist public education system has produced the likes of AOC who espouse socialist programs without any historical backgrounds of the consequences of the Utopian nightmare. One of my readers commented at Canada Free Press:

"Even the Christian Puritan Pilgrims found that out in their foray into socialism in 1620's early America. Their Atlantic journey and colonial establishment was to rely upon the contractual funding of backers in London. A very key component of the contract with these wealthy backers said that all colonists were to get their food, clothing, and other essentials from a common storage stock. Additionally, the colonists were to accumulate all surpluses into a warehouse for the first seven years to be evenly distributed amongst the colonists.

This socialist commune was an utter failure. Their first winter in 1620 saw over half of the Pilgrims perishing. Local natives helped them survive, but the harvests of 1621 and 1622 were dismal.
William Bradford (Governor) wrote to the backers and explained that the socialist philosophy caused lack of progress in the colony and even death and disease. Young, strong men with families resented working for the benefit of other weaker men with families without due compensation. They considered themselves as slaves for their efforts and slacked off their duties. So, the dystopian nightmare of socialism was abandoned in 1623, land was parceled out and life was good again."

My response was as follows.

The Jamestown experiment with socialism and equal shares failed miserably because some people had a better work ethic and worked harder than others. Humans are generally not that altruistic by nature to continue working hard for those who don't.

We had a wise guy say during the communist era, "we pretend to work, and they pretend to pay us." People hid at work, did not do their assigned jobs properly or at all, slept on the job, drank on the job, did jobs during work hours for themselves or for outside friends with whom they bartered for other commodities, took time off for weeks on end with dishonest medical excuses from doctors whom they bribed, while receiving their measly but equal pay like those who actually worked or at least showed up to work and made a minimum effort.

Resentment against the slackers was sky high but nobody could say anything because they always punished or killed the messengers.

Communists claimed that there was no class system under communism but there was, the communist elites and their lackey informers, and the proletariat.