Nikita Khrushchev in 1963 |
“You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright, but we'll keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you'll finally wake up and find you already have communism. We won't have to fight you. We'll so weaken your economy until you'll fall like overripe fruit into our hands.” – Nikita Khrushchev
There was a time, sixty years ago to be exact, when people recognized communism as a threat to world peace, stability, and freedom. Works were published in the west that revealed communism and its dark totalitarian philosophy. Today most publishers bring to light anything liberal and progressive, singing lofty praises to socialism and communism.
Trident Press published in June 1961 a small pocketbook called Conquest Without War, “a mosaic of the words and ideas of the new force that threatens to change the way of life on this planet.” Compiled and edited by N.H. Mager and Jacques Katel, it used Nikita Sergeyevich Khrushchev’s own words and those of his ghost writers, words of Vladimir Ilyich Lenin, Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin, and remarks and commentary made by the two editors in order to provide better understanding of the context in which Khrushchev made certain statements that outraged the world at the time but have been since forgotten in the dustbin of history.
It is crucial to unearth what was supposedly buried with the “death” of communism in 1989 as the American youth is utterly infatuated by socialism, communism, and the ideology which killed more people on the planet than many modern wars combined.
Khrushchev was never shy about stating his desire to establish world communism with the Soviet Union at its helm. Western countries did not take his rhetoric seriously at the time since the Soviet Union barely had enough resources to feed its own people adequately or pay his army well.
Soviet Bolsheviks had a vast network of spies and informers, a strong school of indoctrination, and a disarmed populace that was a very captive audience inside its vast borders, literally and figuratively, as the communist party made sure guns were confiscated for “the good of the people.”
The left in this country, represented by the Democrat Party, has accelerated its anti-gun rhetoric, determined to repeal our right to bear arms. Criminals would not exist, the left says, if only the benevolent government would be allowed to bear arms. Why would we need guns to protect ourselves when the government can do it for us?
Khrushchev’s speeches and unsolicited advice ranged from farming, how to milk cows properly, growing corn and wheat, to how to be a good Soviet, how to write novels, world affairs, harsh criticisms of world leaders, threats, communist slogans, and how communism will be victorious and rule the world under his power. He certainly passed away before he became ruler of the world, preventing more unnecessary human pain, suffering, and misery under his dictatorship of equality.
The central theme of his philosophy was “socialism v. capitalism.” How could he not be victorious over the “decadent, crumbling capitalism,” the very capitalism that has lifted the economic boats of millions of poor people in the U.S.
This theme, “socialism v. capitalism,” has been resurrected today by our domestic communists, new and old, declared communists among U.S. Congress members, socialist academics and public-school teachers, and their indoctrinated generations of students.
He believed that one man, with help from a small but trusted elite group, could control the entire life of humanity as long as the secret police, informers, and a strong army controlled everyone from cradle to grave with incentives for good behavior and harsh punishments for crimes of thought and of insubordination to his philosophy of total control of the human spirit.
Khrushchev died before his dream became reality – he never got to rule the world with an iron fist. But, his philosophical followers, have chosen the global communist leader to be the United Nations with its myriad of Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) spread around the globe.
Rule by the Party of One and the Party State, ideas promoted by Khrushchev and the Bolshevik ideology have become the major political drive among the U.S. population, the electorate, politicians in power, and in other western nations which strangely mirror these developments.
How did the Soviets sell socialism to the masses? The method may seem eerily familiar to you today because it is exactly how the Democrat Socialists like Bernie Sanders and AOC are trying to sell socialism to their voting base.
1.
Socialism is presented as a good, progressive,
enlightened, and effective system based on equality for all. Capitalism is bad,
tired, and evil.
2.
Socialists/communists “cultivate falsehoods
as a deliberate weapon of policy.”
3.
The young and useful idiots alike are mesmerized
by socialism even if they don’t know exactly what it is, or understand the theory
of “scientific socialism,” renamed “Democrat socialism” by Bernie
Sanders; it just sounds great, everything is free and who can resist free?
4.
Socialists say that economic progress is not
possible under capitalism because capitalists are greedy, and they exploit
millions of “working people.” Never mind that socialism has been a disaster
everywhere. The Scandinavian model of generous welfare Democrats desire is based
on heavy capitalist taxation of corporations and of people, it is not
socialism.
5.
Khrushchev said that after the liquidation of
classes, the Soviets had a “monolithic society.” That was, of course, a blatant
lie. Discrimination based on ancestry was rampant. There was the proletariat,
the elites, and the farmers, all neatly stacked in their own little world.
6.
The capitalist system is based on workers who
are “enslaved, living in capitalist bondage,” said Khrushchev. But he
then admitted that the “slaves of capitalism” lived well. Compared to
how we lived under socialism, I would choose capitalism over socialism every time.
7.
Capitalist workers are exploited,
Khrushchev said. During Khrushchev’s time, Soviet workers received 27 cents of
what they produced while Americans received 67 cents and they produced twice as
much. I call that production efficiency not exploitation. And the distribution
of the national product was more egalitarian in the U.S. “Egalitarianism was
actually taboo in the Soviet Union.”
8.
Unemployment was described by socialists as the “great
disaster of capitalism.” The truth was, during Khrushchev’s time, the “unemployed
in the U.S. received in benefits almost twice as much as the Soviet worker was
paid when he was employed.” Khrushchev said that in the USSR there was no unemployment.
He called it surplus workers. If the Soviets did recognize that
technological unemployment existed, they would have had to recognize that there
were other categories of unemployment.
9.
Khrushchev warned those who did not work. “An
able-bodied person who does not work steals from those who work, that is, lives
at the expense of those who create material or spiritual values. An atmosphere
must be created in which those who despise work are not tolerated. Every person
who lives in a communist society must make a contribution by his or her labor
toward the building and further development of that society.”
10.
Socialist women were emancipated, Khrushchev
said. Yet they worked much harder than other women and at back-breaking work in
factories, side by side with men.
11.
Eventually socialism will turn into communism
when people will receive “to each according to his needs.” Translation –
everyone will work according to his abilities and be rewarded according to his
needs. Who will get to decide? The communist party elites. One thing is sure,
nobody will be idle, everyone will toil for collectivism. Will there be enough
wealth to satisfy all needs in whatever distribution scheme the elites arrange?
Probably not, rationing will have to take place. But they say, there will be no
more “want” of anything under socialism/communism. Really?
12.
When no more “wants” exist, the population will
be entirely happy and satisfied and the police state will have to disappear.
Will it? And then “the citizens will manage the nation.” Will they manage
the nation, or will chaos descend?
The reality was that the Soviet Union, a super-welfare socialist state, with all its socialist satellites, had to be maintained by intense propaganda, an army of security police, regular police, economic police, informers, communist party apparatchiks, closed borders with mine fields and barbed wire to keep people prisoners within, armed security guards told to shoot if anyone tried to escape, propagandists at work, in schools, in the mass media, and enforcers who followed “lucky” travelers abroad very closely. All these armed to their teeth guardians of socialism kept a tight reign on the disarmed, afraid, and barely fed population. A dog kept on a chain all the time and partially fed has no choice but to appear loyal to his master.
Socialism was just boastful and meaningless semantic propaganda, cleverly worded and designed to keep a tight totalitarian reign on a scared and demoralized populace that realized too late that the rose-colored lies they were promised were just too good to be true.
No comments:
Post a Comment