“It’s a brave new world,” one in which radicals are elected
to high office in a system more corrupt and ignorant than ever imagined
possible. The voters believe in the “shiny illusions of socialist/communist
hell and are racing to implementation.”
Americans are not quite sure when the surge to communism finally
planted its roots in the population at large and things began to change. Some
argue it was the 1950s, others the 1960s. Over time, the corrupt main stream
media and the progressive-controlled education system brought us slowly but
surely to today when good people are overwhelmed by manufactured news and
personal attacks meant to marginalize anyone who disagrees with the socialist
agenda, while the entire system of liberty and justice for all is collapsing.
The dangerous cult of personality which mesmerized an entire
nation into submission to a magical black president now includes Millennials
like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York), who, despite her International
Relations degree, is, by her own admission, totally ignorant of world politics,
and two Muslim women who took their oath on a book that contradicts everything our
Constitution stands for and are flinging vulgarities and anti-Israel
/anti-American insults to the American public.
The same MSM that gives them ample air time to insult anyone
who disagrees with them, was mostly silent when three new Congressmen, real
American heroes and Purple Heart recipients, were sworn in, the “5 eyes, 5
arms, 4 legs … All American” as Rep. Mast said. Jim Baird (R-Indiana) lost his left arm in
Vietnam. Brian Mast (R-Florida) lost both legs in Afghanistan. Dan Crenshaw
(R-Texas) lost his right eye in Afghanistan. Nobody saw them on the evening news but air
time was extended ad nauseam to the “new breed of women politicians” who offends
us with overt anti-Americanism.
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s strong and strange socialist charisma
appeals to a large segment of the American population, liberals and Democrats
alike, who have made a cult hero out of a former bartender.
Maduro of Venezuela was a taxi driver before he became
president. He appealed to
low-information voters who have now managed to self-destruct under the
leadership or lack thereof of a socialist, long on rhetoric, and short on the knowledge
how to successfully lead a country rich in petroleum, a formerly prosperous
nation, now a basket case of poverty, rationing, and hunger. He drove it into
the ground, turning into the hell-hole of socialism that it is today.
The Cuban model, the Castro brothers communist dictatorship,
ended in disaster in Venezuela just as it did everywhere else
socialism/communism had been tried.
Should she be ignored in hope that she goes away back to the
obscurity she came from? Liberals are already talking of making her president.
People with real skill, intellect, sound judgment, and logical arguments must
speak out with intelligence and force. But when they do, would anybody listen?I am not at all surprised that young and old Americans alike are suddenly infatuated with the empty promises of socialism and communism and do not listen to reason. Decades of socialist indoctrination in public schools and progressive MSM are finally paying off for Democrats and their globalist fellow travelers.
In the country of my birth, where millions have suffered and
died under the boot of socialism and of Ceausescu’s Communist Party
dictatorship, there does not appear to exist a significant and strong conservative
wing, politics in Parliament swing back and forth between socialists and
communists. How is that possible when their parents and extended families lived
in such hell of fear and brutal oppression for decades?
Young Romanians view any foreigners, no matter how poor in
their own countries and how far left leaning they are, as rich capitalists who
abuse and steal from the poor. Their parents have been told for decades under
communism that capitalists exploit the working class, out to steal their rights
to utopian communism that left them hungry, cold, and poor in perpetuity. It is
extraordinarily bizarre to see young generations, with their smart phones,
cars, plenty of food, and other electronic gadgets produced by capitalism,
indoctrinated by schools and the media into believing that free-market capitalism
poses a fundamental threat to their avowed neo-communism.
A young American friend, who currently
lives with his wife in Romania, is considering moving his family to America. As
Darius explained, “she’s fixated on the idea of living in an America that
probably hasn’t existed since the 1990s at the latest.” He is afraid to discuss
any conservative ideas with the young Romanians who openly and proudly express
their communist affiliation, rejecting all other ideas that contradict and
diverge from their proletarian ideology.
It is no surprise that such
young people were indoctrinated by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) who
made their way into the Iron Curtain as soon as it “fell” in 1990. George Soros
boasted in an interview that he was the first to be given access into Romania
after Christmas 1989 when Ceausescu was executed for communist crimes against
his own people. Soros allegedly met with the minister of education to discuss
the new curricula post Ceausescu’s regime. Scores of young Romanians studied abroad with
financial help from his foundations, assuring their allegiance to the new world
globalism.
I have met several such students
in 1991, who had been brought to an all-black southern U.S. college to study for
Masters Degrees in management. When the two-year university indoctrination
ended, they went back to work in the recently fashioned government comprised of
former communist upper echelon apparatchiks who had rebranded themselves into
the new world globalists.
The “sudden” infatuation of the
West with socialism/communism has been developing over decades as the
communists had planned to go underground and rebrand themselves into the global
communists of today, championed by the United Nations and “civil society,”
meaning intellectuals, academics, and other lapdogs of liberalism who advertise
and promote everything the U.N. publishes.
Vladimir Bukovsky explained these
phenomena in the upcoming English version of his book, “Judgment in Moscow.” He
had found documents in Russia to prove that the reason the horrific crimes of
the former Soviet Union and its satellites were not punished like the Nazi
crimes were fifty years before was the “Kremlin’s links to and influence over
Western political parties, governments, media, and prominent individuals, as
revealed in the documents. It was these powerful links, he writes, that
prevented any push to prosecute the extreme human rights abuses that took place
over the decades of Soviet rule. As a result, the Communist Party and KGB elite
were left to regroup and re-establish their power – with new names and new
methods, perhaps, but the same goal: to undermine Western democracy.”
It is with sadness, agony, and
dread that I see daily evidence of Western democracies turning back to the
future. Some people never learn from history and must repeat it no matter how
disastrous.
So true!! You are remarkable. Maybe next time I am in Virginia we can meet for coffee. I wish I haf 1/10th of your talent
ReplyDeleteI would love to see you, Harriet! You are the true New York times bestselling author. Everyone should read your Agenda 21 books. They might see those scenarios in a not-too-distant future. You are my friend and inspiration.
DeleteThank you Ileana! I have thought for years the reason there was so justice for the victims of the USSR and it's communist satellites was they controlled all the evidence until after 1991, and possibly destroyed the most damaging stuff by then. Bukovsky's explanation rings more true.
ReplyDeleteYes, they probably destroyed a lot of evidence, Carol, but there is so much left, if people knew where to look, spoke the language, and had the time and access to the places where they are stored.
Delete