“Current lifestyles and consumption
patterns of the affluent middle class – involving high meat intake, use of
fossil fuels, appliances, home and work air conditioning, and suburban housing
are not sustainable.” - Maurice Strong, Secretary
General of the U.N. Earth Summit, 1992.
The U.N. Agenda
21 adopted in 1992 and signed by 178 countries has morphed into Agenda 2030
adopted in 2015 with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and 169 “specific
targets.” As Alex Newman described it, it is a recipe for “global socialism and
corporatism/fascism” foisted upon the world by the United Nations. https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism
My 2012 book,
“U.N. Agenda 21: Environmental Piracy,” explains the U.N. effort to rearrange
the way we live, the way we do business, an effort to redistribute our wealth
to all third world nations, friends and foes. https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=UN+Agenda+21%3A+Environmental+Piracy
The 17
Sustainable Development Goals can be found at this site which is labeled “post
2015” Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform. Indoctrination into global
socialism may be subtle and euphemistic, but the message of controlling
everything is clear. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld
SD is a
U.N.-led effort to reduce consumption, force social equity (social justice),
and preserve and restore biodiversity through economic, social, and environmental
policies integration.
“Sustainablists”
insist that every decision made in all societies must be made taking into
account the impact on the environment. Global land use, global education, and
global population control and reduction must be controlled and “harmonized.”
Social
equity (social justice) is described as the right of all people “to benefit
equally from the resources afforded us by society and the environment.” This
includes redistributing wealth and treating private property and national
sovereignty as socially unjust while seeking universal health care as a right.
At the local
and state levels one organization, Local Governments for Sustainability,
previously named International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
(ICLEI), has been responsible for introducing Public Private Partnerships
(PPP), special agreements between government and corporations that receive tax
breaks, grants, and eminent domain through government’s power to implement
sustainable policies.
Tom DeWeese
described these public-private partnerships as “government-sanctioned
monopolies.” Tom DeWeese, President of American Policy Center, has been
fighting property rights infringements by ICLEI and their visioning committees
for years.
Local
sustainable polices include Smart Growth, Wildlands Project, Resilient Cities,
Regional Visioning Projects, STAR Sustainable Communities, Green Jobs, Green
building codes, Going Green, Alternative Energy, Local Visioning, regional
planning, historic preservation, conservation easements, development rights,
sustainable farming, comprehensive planning, and growth management.
Outside
facilitators that no locals have ever met or heard bring “consensus” to a local
government and the pre-determined “visioning” of the “visioning committee” and
its invisible “stakeholders” is being imposed on the local population that has
not voted on nor had it been informed of the plan and of its outcome.
In addition to
ICLEI that some local communities and cities pay dues to, there are other
groups that aid in the implementation of world-wide Sustainable Development: American Planning Council, the Renaissance
Planning Group, International City/County Management Group, U.S. Mayors
Conference, National Governors Association, National League of Cities, National
Association of County Administrators, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs),
and official U.S. government agencies.
Executive
Order #12852, issued by Bill Clinton in
1993, created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development to “harmonize”
U.S. environmental policy with U.N. directives as outlined in U.N. Agenda 21,”
and directed all federal government agencies to “reinvent government” with the
help of state and local governments. https://clintonwhitehouse2.archives.gov/PCSD/Charter/
Each year U.N.
Agenda 21 which has morphed into 2030 Agenda is imposed on the participating
countries, including U.S., at the local, state, and federal level under the
infamous Sustainable Development (SD).
Wealth redistribution is not the entire U.N. Agenda
2030. They want to control population size, to engineer where we live through
high-rise mixed-use urban settlements and forced mass migration (Europeans are
already experiencing a dose of this forced migration and so are Americans),
eliminating borders, and nudging governments to seize control of the means of
production, directly or through fascistic decrees. U.N. is telling us clearly, “We
commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and
consume goods and services.” Who is going to decide what is “sustainable patterns of consumption and production” and what will the consequences of non-compliance be?
Alex Newman
described Agenda 2030 as a “the UN plot …aimed at ‘transforming’ the world. The program is a follow-up
to the last 15-year UN plan, the defunct “Millennium Development Goals,” or
MDGs. It also dovetails nicely with the deeply controversial UN Agenda 21, even
including much of the same rhetoric and agenda. But the combined Agenda 2030
goals for achieving what is euphemistically called “sustainable development”
represent previous UN plans on steroids — deeper, more radical, more draconian,
and more expensive.” https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism
The “principal
UN body mandated to review implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable
Development and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)” is the High Level
Political Forum (HLPF). HLPF examines every year the progress made. This year’s
meeting in New York on July 9-18 will discuss SDG 6 (clean water and safe
sanitation), SDG 7 (affordable and clean energy), SDG 11 (inclusive and
sustainable cities), SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production), SDG 15
(life on land), and SDG 17 (partnerships for the global goals).
The meeting,
“Transformation towards sustainable and
resilient societies,” is co-organized by the International Organization for
Migration (IOM), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. (FAO), the
Geneva Water Hub, the U.N. Convention to Combat Desertification, the United
Nations University–Institute for Water, Environment and Health, and U.N.-Water,
in partnership with the Permanent Mission of the Federal Government of Somalia
to the U.N. Who knew that a country known for its pirates is now making policy
for the rest of the world?
Discussion
topics will include:
-
“Vanishing
Waters and Drying Lands: Impacts on Migration,” focusing on “migration,
environment and climate change nexus” – (even though the global warming/climate
change has been debunked for its faulty data and lack of scientific evidence)
Policy responses will be drafted in regards to water, land, and
migration.
-
“Migration
Governance in the GCC: Towards Inclusive, Safe and Resilient Societies” will be
hosted by Philippines and Bahrain Permanent Mission at the U.N. and Migrant
Forum of Asia (an NGO) and explore “Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration as it
intersects with Sustainable Development Goals.”
-
Launch
in January 2018 of the Global Plan of Action for Sustainable Energy Solutions
in Situations of Displacement – “130 million people are in need of humanitarian
assistance due to conflict, natural disasters, and other complex global
challenges.” This global plan is “non-binding”
but represents “concrete recommendations” to give “safe access to affordable,
reliable, sustainable, and modern energy services for all displaced people by
2030.” The western and developed world will no doubt foot the bill for this new
third world bureaucracy and its “harmonizing” philanthropy.
As is always the case, the United
Nations third world SD cabal includes third world governments, business, “civil
society leaders,” private sector, academia, and other never named “stakeholders”
which usually translates as Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), “non-profits”
with a well-paid and well-traveled staff.Assisting Member States to achieve the migration objectives of the 2030 Agenda and the SDGs for a “dignified and humane migration,” the International Office for Migration (IOM) provided input to the 2018 HLPF. https://www.iom.int/news/migration-and-sustainable-development-goals-focus-2018-high-level-political-forum
No comments:
Post a Comment