Photo: Wikipedia |
The developed world appears to be changing in the same
direction, at the same time, at an alarming speed, relatively speaking. What is
the common dominator and drive behind this change towards a one world global
governance and global citizenship? What is rushing everything towards global
socialism? How is this possible when countries have different levels of
development, education, economies, government, history, religion, wars, and conflicts?
The wails and demands of “equality” resound in the corridors of power and in the main stream
media around the globe. I’ve heard the tired-out claims that “Socialism means
genuine social equality,” giving “basic rights to the working class – the right to a job, education, health
care, a secure retirement, a decent standard of living, a world without war.”
This idyllic and utopian socialism will be attained by “the establishment of
workers’ power.”
I have experienced the reality of socialism and it was quite
different than the rhetoric. Not only were the workers not equal nor in power,
but they were in abject poverty when compared to the working middle class under
the much maligned “capitalism.”
Then there is the nagging and very important question – Who
or what gives and guarantees all these rights that the socialists want? It
can’t be God because socialists are atheists; atheism is their religion. It can’t
be government because bureaucrats, who confiscate wealth to distribute it from
producers to non-producers, eventually run out of other people’s money and the
whole scheme collapses.
The Industrial Revolution is blamed for many ills in
society, including the manufactured anthropogenic global warming which spawned
an entire environmental industry of climate change worth trillions annually. Will and Ariel Durant believed that the Industrial
Revolution “brought with it democracy, feminism, birth control, socialism, the
decline of religion, the loosening of morals…”
Will and Ariel Durant, historians who are considered two of
the greatest thinkers of our time, wrote in “The Lessons of History” (1968)
that there are three important lessons of biological history:
1.
Life is
competition – “Animals eat one another without qualm; civilized men consume
one another by due process of law.”
2.
Life is
selection – “Inequality is natural and inborn”
By Nature, “we are all born unfree and
unequal: subject to our physical and psychological heredity and to the customs
and traditions of our group; diversely endowed in health and strength, in
mental capacity and qualities of character. Nature loves difference as the
necessary material of selection and evolution.”
3. Life must breed - …”a high birth rate
has usually accompanied a culturally low civilization, and a low birth rate a
civilization culturally high;” in nature “a nation with a low birth rate shall
be periodically chastened by some more virile and fertile group.”
Nature knows how to restore balance in nations through “pestilence,
famine, and war,” they added.
Durant called the rapidly emerging one world government of
today, the “international government,” which was the result, in his opinion, of
industry, banking and finance, and international trade across sovereign borders.
In the current world we have oligarchies in which a tiny
minority elite rules. This rule can be imposed by birth (aristocracy), by
religion (theocracy), or by vast wealth (democracy).
Observing the role of the United Nations around the world
and their environmentalist militancy expressed through sustainable development of
Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and other population control organizations, an elite
composed of mostly western billionaires is moving the world towards a one world
government with its own global police force, military, banking and finance, commerce,
renewables, science, agriculture, land and water use, and industry.
But how were they able to achieve such infiltration in every
country in the developed and not-so developed world? The most obvious answer is
through indoctrination in schools, emphasizing erasure of borders (flooding the
world with refugees and illegal aliens as their right), dumbing down standards
of intellectual aspirations, removing true history from the curriculum of
various nations, making children feel ashamed of their country’s history and
accomplishments, preparing them as early as kindergarten for global
citizenship, and removing their allegiance to their parents and to their
country and placing it in the hands of the globalist educators/indoctrinators.
In addition to indoctrination in schools and through mass
media, other very important vectors of transformation into one world governance
include the United Nations, government finance, and politics at all levels. Additionally,
cultural decadence, moral and religious degradation, race baiting, political
correctness with charges of racism and hate speech, and class enmity/violence
coupled with accusations of phony “white privilege” round out the
indoctrination into global socialism.
How do the United Nations, government finance, and politicians
influence local and state governments to change in the same desired global
direction? It is quite simple – through the honey pot of taxpayer grants and
competitive financial awards which are administered by Non-Governmental
Organizations (NGOs), currently operating in every country in the world with
additional money from special interest groups and billionaires.
These non-profits and lobbying groups are awash with cash
which hook those in need of funds, people, towns, and regions around the world,
making them dance to the tune of progressivism, equality, social justice,
environmental justice, gender justice, racial justice, inching them closer and closer
to one world global governance.
The NGOs are hard at work around the world employing
volunteers and young people who either cannot find a job in their fields, are
on a quest to find themselves, or enjoy traveling and exploring while being
paid to further what they perceive to be a noble cause or idea. NGOs are classified
as charitable, service, participatory, and empowering.
NGOs are organized around communities, cities, on a national
level or on an international level. Other euphemistic names for NGOs are “private
voluntary organization,” “civil society,” “independent sector,” “self-help
organization,” grassroots organization,” “volunteer sector,” “transnational
social movement,” and “non-state actors” (NSAs).
-
BINGO
(a business-friendly international NGO)
-
CITS
(looking for young talent in research and development)
-
CSO
(civil society organization)
-
DONGO (donor
organized NGO)
-
ENGO (environmental
NGO)
-
GONGO (government-operated
NGO)
-
INGO
(international NGO)
-
QUANGO
(quasi-autonomous NGO)
-
TANGO
(technical assistance NGO)
-
MANGO
(market advocacy NGO)
-
GSO (grassroots
support organization)
-
CHARDS (community
health and rural development society)
The World Bank classifies NGOs as advocacy and operational.
Advocacy NGOs promote a cause through lobbying, media, and aggressive activism.
Operational NGOs create and implement development projects in communities, on national
levels, or international levels.
Most of the grants and money distributed through NGOs come
with strings attached which require the receivers to adopt the one world
government underlying stance and regulations. When strapped for immediate funds,
the receivers agree to the terms and are thus hooked for a long time.
NGOs, with their lobbyists, activists, volunteers, and supporters,
are the busy workers of the ant colony of global progressivism working for
billionaires, for financiers, for government regulatory and bureaucratic organizations,
and the United Nations to promote, create, develop, and enforce one world
governance.
Israel has been fed up with foreign funded NGOs influencing politic inside Israel and is on the verge of passing a Transparency Law requiring all NGOs to disclose the source of their funding. The US and other countries have reacted strongly, falsely calling it anti-democratic. Story at http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/206481
ReplyDeleteThat is unfortunate, PaBlum, that U.S. is calling the move undemocratic, but I am not surprised. This is coming from the most "transparent" administration no less.
Delete