 |
| The stairwell we climbed to our 5th floor apartment every day, app. 400 sq. feet |
It seems
that our national sovereignty is yielding quite fast on the southern border without
Congressional input, under the guise of a socially engineered humanitarian
crisis. They could not erase national sovereignty fast enough in the name of “environmental
cooperation.”
The progressives’
social engineering projects implemented around the world are not limited to
just destroying national sovereignty, language, and cultural identity. Those who
grew up under communism are familiar with the Soviet style, mass movement of
entire villages to high density urban areas.
Social
engineers had decided that land was better used in co-operative farms owned by
the communist government. Private homes located on farm land were bulldozed and
people were moved into densely populated cities with grey concrete apartments
of 400-500 square feet, mushrooming practically overnight. They could not build
them fast enough. Often it necessitated moving two families into a 600 square
feet apartment, sharing the kitchen and the bathroom.
The Chinese have embarked on large scale
social engineering over the next ten years, in their quest to move 250 million
people from rural areas into high rise, high density newly built ghost cities that
are currently uninhabited; few citizens have purchased the tiny apartments and few
stores leased the bottom floor spaces.
“The government, often by fiat, is replacing
small rural homes with high-rises, paving over vast swaths of farmland and
drastically altering the lives of rural dwellers. So large is the scale that
the number of brand-new Chinese city dwellers will approach the total urban
population of the United States — in a country already bursting with
megacities.” http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/16/world/asia/chinas-great-uprooting-moving-250-million-into-cities.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
In this country,
city planners who oppose urban sprawl and begrudge the average 2,300 square foot
homes as environmental destroyers of the planet, have designed and built living
units of 140-200 square feet, called aPodments in Sammamish, Washington. Resident
Judy Green “shares the kitchen with seven other tenants on the second floor.”
To get to her loft cubicle, she must climb six flights of stairs. Because of non-existent
global warming, cars and elevators are not allowed. The “micro-units” are
smaller than a hotel room and rent for $600-900 per month. I checked with my
favorite hotel chain - their average hotel room is 375 square feet. The average
jail cell is 6 feet by 8 feet. http://www.komonews.com/news/local/Tiny-aPodments-causing-big-controversy-in-Seattle--224002631.html
The “eco-progressives”
use local government zoning to impose their ideas of “sustainable urbanism,” “sustainable
communities,” and “equitable communities,” by changing the counties’ desired
low density character and scale to high-density crime-ridden slums.
In Fairfax County,
Virginia, the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission are crafting a
plan to place Lilliputian slum dwellings in every area of the county. The
Residential Studio Units (RSUs) will have a total surface of 220-320 square
feet. Each high-rise will contain 75 such units and one parking space per unit.
Locals object to the plan because it will reduce property values, change
neighborhoods, increase population density, exacerbate the existing traffic congestion,
and increase crime under the guise of “affordable housing” for the poor, low
wage workers, and “diversity.”
“Social engineering is on the verge of being
imposed on entire neighborhoods,” said Rush Limbaugh in a brilliant tirade. The
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) will dismantle local zoning
and force people to move into certain areas in order to achieve what they
consider “racial, economic, and ethnic diversity.” This is “nationalizing
neighborhoods” on a grand scale for our “own good and to achieve utopia.” By
obliterating zoning regulations, we will have neighborhoods by government
quota. (Rush Limbaugh EIB monologue, September 12, 2013)
Reality television is now indoctrinating
Americans into accepting the idea of micro-dwellings with the July 2014 debut
of “Tiny House Nation” on the FYI channel. According to their website, “renovation experts and hosts, John Weisbarth and Zack
Giffin, travel across America to show off ingenious small spaces and the
inventive people who live in them, as well as help new families design and
construct their own mini-dream home
in a space no larger than 500 square feet. From a micro-apartment in New York
City to a caboose car turned home in Montana to a micro-sized mobile home for
road tripping – this is a series that celebrates
the exploding movement of tiny homes.” http://www.fyi.tv/shows/tiny-house-nation/about/season-1
Perhaps “extreme downsizing” is the dream of retired
people or the reality of young Americans who live with several roommates or in
the basement of their parents because they cannot afford to buy a normal home
on low wages driven by a mismanaged economy. What I do know for sure, this not
an “exploding movement of tiny homes” and it has nothing to do with “financial
independence.” Most Americans have never heard of such tiny dwellings, love
their spacious homes, and are not remotely aware that they are an intricate
part of a larger plan of social engineering people off the land, out of
suburbia, and into inner cities. It is certainly not the new American dream; it
is the new forced reality as envisioned and carefully planned by the elite’s UN
Agenda 21.
Has anyone seen any influential people, CEOs, wealthy
people, politicians, actors, Hollywood producers, radio and TV mouth pieces, lobbyists,
corporatists, crony capitalists, who advocate that we live in spaces slightly
larger than a jail cell and drive tin cans, give up their large mansions and
multiple homes around the world, their jets and yachts?
No comments:
Post a Comment