While
the people of Tombstone, Arizona, are waiting to get water back on line, the
federal government is asking them for $80,000 in order to tell me why they
cannot have it back unless they use only simple tools to do it with, like hand
tools and wheelbarrows. Boulders the size of Volkswagens are trapping the
waterlines, buried in some places under 12 ft of mud.
USDA
Forest Service alludes to provisions in the Wilderness Act, which forbids the
use of heavy machinery. According to Joe Wolverton, II, “water rights granted
to Tombstone by the previous title owners predate the enactment of the
Wilderness Act by about 80 years.” (The
New American)
“The
Town too Tough to Die” of 1,600 inhabitants had found itself in the middle of a
terrible life and death quandary as a result of the Monument Fire in 2011 which
destroyed the Huachuca Mountains pipelines carrying water to the town from the
source in the Miller Canyon Wilderness Area. (Joe Wolverton, II, The New American)
According
to Hugh Holub, water rights expert, quoted by Joe Wolverton, II, “Though the
water may originate on National Forest lands, Bureau of Land Management lands,
and other federally managed lands, the rights to that water belongs to the
farms and ranches and cities.” Lawyers for this administration and
environmentalists disagree.
The
Club of Rome proclaims in their 1990 publication, The First Global Revolution, on page 75, “The common enemy of
humanity is Man.” The paragraph beneath this title describes how they concocted
the idea of man-made global warming.
“In searching
for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea of
pollution, the threat of global warming, water
shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill…The real enemy is
humanity itself.”
Water
shortages can be real or government manufactured like the case of Tombstone,
Arizona. The EPA started a “green war” against farmers in the fertile San
Joaquin Valley in California; it left one of America’s main agricultural regions
a dust bowl in 2009. The EPA-made drought put many farmers out of business,
thousands became jobless, and millions of Americans paid higher prices for fruits
and vegetables imported from other countries that could have been grown in
California. EPA and the environmentalists protected a tiny fish, the delta
smelt, while endangering humans.
Maurice
Strong and Al Gore are members of the Club of Rome and involved in privately
owned carbon-trading groups who stand to gain billions if the man-made global
warming fraud survives and the EPA continues to destroy our economy, jobs, and
our way of life.
A
world government is gaining tract through social science consensus. There is
nothing scientific about social science; it is strictly the opinion of a group
of people who are in consensus or
agreement concerning the need to regulate the planet in line with their
beliefs. Science is exact and a fact. Social science is an opinion and a belief
derived from personal experience, perception, or five-point scale surveys of
groups of like-minded individuals and ignorant people.
In
preparation for the UN Agenda Rio +20 conference in June 2012, F. Biermann et
al., 33 social scientists, published in Science magazine on March 16, 2012,
their contribution to the “earth system governance and planetary stewardship.”
The article appears under the heading Science and Government, “Navigating the
Anthropocene: Improving Earth System Governance.”
It
does not take a rocket scientist to determine that government policy is not
science, consensus is not scientific, and the liberals’ mantra, “global warming
science is settled,” is a lie.
Biermann
et al. proposed “seven building blocks,” the result of social science-based
research conducted in 2011 by the Earth System Governance Project. This paper
was designed to “contribute to the 2012 United Nations Conference on
Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, which will focus on the
institutional framework for sustainable development and possible reforms of the
intergovernmental governance system.” The writers believe that, in spite of
differences of opinion among social
scientists, there is an increasing consensus
in many areas, therefore the planet must be ready for one world governance,
erasing all traces of sovereignty in the name of saving the planet.
1.
A
global environmental agency similar to the World Health Organization should be formed
to set agendas, develop norms, manage compliance, assess science, and build capacity.
2.
Integrate
sustainable development from local to global levels into a powerful United Nations
Sustainable Development Council.
3.
“Better
integration of sustainability governance requires governments to close
remaining regulatory gaps at the global level,” including the sharing of
nanotechnology, synthetic biology, and geo-engineering.
Closing regulatory gaps explains the Executive
Order on May 1, 2012 on Promoting
International Regulatory Cooperation. “The purpose of the E.O. is to
encourage the harmonization of regulatory requirements to simplify regulatory compliance,
reduce costs for transnational companies and facilitate international trade.”
(Jonathan H. Adler)
4.
Governments
must place a “stronger emphasis on planetary concerns in economic governance.”
5.
Voting
on global policy must be weighted for some countries and no veto power granted to
anyone in order to speed up international norm setting.
6.
“Global
governance through UN-type institutions tends to give a larger role to
international and domestic bureaucracies, at the cost of national parliaments.”
A simple translation - global governance
would supersede national governments. Countries would be divided into regions
and/or different interests such as environmentalists, industry, youth, etc. The
United States would thus no longer have states; we would have regions and
regionalism under the aegis of the United Nations Sustainable Development
Council.
7.
Equity
and fairness (read socialism/communism) would guide the transfer of wealth to
poorer countries. The paper proposes “novel financial mechanisms to transfer
wealth through global emissions markets and air transportation levies for
sustainability purposes.” The middle class would completely disappear under
such equity and fairness. Everyone would be equally poor and miserable, with the
self-appointed global governance elites at the top.
The
paper oozes a sense of urgency, like thieves trying to steal as much loot as
possible before they are discovered and unmasked. These 33 social scientists do
not want to stop just at transfer of wealth, destroying the middle class, erasing
national boundaries, and neutering national governments, they want to “change the
behavior of citizens,” and re-orient “the private sector toward a green
economy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment