We
have had an incremental communist/Islamist/fascistic/environmentalist revolution
in the U.S. facilitated by illegal immigration, refusal to accept American
values, culture, and language, lack of border protection, the liberal
indoctrination of our population in the name of religious tolerance, political
correctness as a form of speech control, unions, politicians’ betrayal, and
environmentalism. The tragedy is that nobody paid attention or noticed.
European
nations such as France and Germany acknowledged through their respective
leaders that the darling liberal philosophy of “multiculturalism” has failed
miserably across Europe.
Associate
Professor of Political Science Jonathan Laurence at Boston College believes the
culprit for the failure of Islamic immigrants’ integration in Europe to be
“anomie.” (The New York Times, “How to Integrate Europe’s Muslims,” January 23,
2012)
The
dictionary defines “anomie” as a societal instability caused by the erosion and
abandonment of moral and social codes. Muslims perceive the absence of a
supporting moral and social framework in the country they immigrate to and express
their displeasure through a social alienation and feelings of disorientation,
which result in violence and hatred.
It
is not that young immigrants of Muslim faith hate the infidels. It must be anomie
that persuades immigrants to take to the streets, causing violence and burning
private property, while calling for the destruction of the very Western culture,
which took them in and supported them financially. Western culture is not only
ignored and maligned, but also rejected vehemently.
Liberals
like to attribute the lack of Muslim integration to right-wing citizens who do
not allow Muslims their religious requirements, thus preventing assimilation
and creating radicalism. The fact that mosques teach children intolerance and
hatred toward Christians, and Christians are killed all over Africa gets lost
in the narrative.
Liberals
think that Muslims should have “democratic rights” to form associations and
participate in political life. Democracy is a lofty goal, however, most Muslim
countries do not understand the concept of democracy which is alien to their
history. They are totalitarian regimes ruled by seventh century norms of behavior
and moral code. Furthermore, Shariah Law is incompatible with western law and
our Constitution.
Once
a person desires to immigrate to another country, they should abide by the laws
in that country, not the Shariah Code of the country they have left. Rejecting
the law of the land should have one solution, repatriation of the immigrants to
the country of origin where they are free to follow their tribal law.
Nobody
prevents Muslims from seeking political office, they certainly have plenty of
money to run campaigns and have done so successfully. They can buy businesses,
real estate, and land, build mosques, and open their own schools.
A
Western nation believes in religious liberty. It has a unifying language, a
legal code, and culture that define that country. Excessive tolerance to allow immigrant
sub-sets to take over will result in the destruction of the host country and
culture.
Liberals
are eager to vilify citizen patriots as right-wing extremists and hate mongers when
they blame the lack of integration of the large-scale immigrant population,
Muslim or Christian, into the host western culture on excessive tolerance.
The
immigration influx started in the early seventies, enabled, promoted, and
protected by progressives. The fruits of such policies are social unrest, legal
and justice duality, all born and sustained by unbridled multiculturalism.
Liberals
have turned many European cultures upside down with their excessive tolerance
towards immigrants from non-Christian roots, giving them not only basic rights
as the local population, but privileges that ordinary citizens do not have but
must subsidize through taxation.
At
the same time, it is hard to blame Muslims for rejecting a western culture,
which is defined by rampant corruption, lawlessness, moral decay, and the
trampling of faith and family. However, if they are so incensed by Western
cultures, they should have stayed in the countries they left where they were
comfortable and happy with their own value system.
Women
in western countries have fought hard to gain equal rights with men in the work
place, the right to vote, drive cars, go to church alone or with their
husbands, express their opinions freely without consulting first with a male
family member, go out in public in the garment of their choice, go to the beach
in a bikini, and go shopping or on vacation without a male chaperone. Western females
are not subjected to the Muslim-style dual daily reality of separate but equal,
and the status of a half a person in a court of law.
Islamic theology is incompatible with Western values and particularly our Constitution. Shariah Law should not co-exist within our legal system. Everybody should be equal under the law of a country and appear in front of the same judge not a special theocratic tribal judge.
Everybody
should learn the history of the host country, the language, the culture, should
respect the Constitution, the flag, the national anthem, and obey the laws. Seeking
to establish a world Caliphate and replacing our democratically elected
representatives with a theocratic system of government is alien to our culture.
Wearing costumes that hide completely the identity of a person is not a western
custom. Expecting and demanding special treatment because of religious beliefs
is counter-productive to a civil society.
Liberal
political correctness has replaced for decades common sense and stifled
conservative freedom of speech. Hate speech has now taken the place of
political correctness in Britain and soon in the U.S. by adding the punishing
teeth of the law. Conservative speech is now deemed inflammatory and resulted
in the banning from England of a famous talk show host.
I
may be naïve, but in modern times, I cannot imagine a Christian who would
censor or object to any worshipper of another God. We welcome anyone who is
faithful to the U.S. and swears allegiance to protect it.
I
understand Americans who mistrust immigrants who carry allegiance to their
former countries and seek to destroy the host country as well as forbid and
annihilate any other faith other than their own. Until such time, IN GOD WE
TRUST features prominently on our U.S. currency and in any institution that has
not been sued by the atheist ACLU to have any mention of God removed from the
premises.
While
we are busy developing new ways to improve life and alleviate pain and
suffering for humanity, “nation building” Iraq and Afghanistan into the
democracy they do not want, the Islamists are confident that we will submit to
their seventh century theocratic life style and the Caliphate will reign
supreme.
While
the communist elites want to control us for the “common good," "social
justice,” and the interest of the proletariat by eliminating the middle class,
the so-called “bourgeoisie,” the environmentalists on the march are restricting
our lives, property, and freedoms into “sustainability” through regulatory
doomsday faux predictions, sending us to the stone age by interdicting the use
of fossil fuels.
No comments:
Post a Comment