James Gustave Speth, after co-founding the Natural Defense Council in 1971, ran the World Resource Institute, ultimately becoming the head of the U.N. Development Program.
In 1997, Speth
said, “Global governance is here, here to stay, and driven by economic
and environmental globalization, global governance will inevitably expand.”
Thanks to
U.N. Agenda 21 signed by most nations in 1992, and to President Clinton who
started its implementation at all levels of government, U.N. global governance has
expanded and taken over everything with SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT and its
lynchpin, SUSTAINABILITY.
What exactly
is global governance? Maurice Strong, with a U.N.-funded Commission on Global
Governance, produced a 410-page report, Our Global Neighborhood, with
recommendations. It was not defined until 1999: “Global governance is the
framework of rules, institutions, and practices that set limits on behavior of
individuals, organizations, and companies.” The U.N. claims that global governance
is not the same as world government which is ridiculous semantics.
Global
governance definition expanded into “policies created by non-elected
bureaucrats from international institutions, usually located in Switzerland,
who limit the behavior of individuals, organizations, and companies.”
Ever since
Cecil Rhodes’ “Secret Society” of 1891, a select group of European monarchs, global
billionaires, and other elites believed that society would be best controlled by
a benevolent global government made up of “enlightened intelligentsia.”
This
philosophy was advanced by organizations such as Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, World Federalist Association, Woodrow Wilson National
Fellowship Foundation, Center for American Progress, and others.
Was the origin
of global governance, the wide restrictions on individual freedoms at all
levels, the New World Order?
In
1990-1991, following the 1989 collapse of the Soviet Union, the idea of President
Bush’s New World Order (NWO) quickly became part of the media lexicon. Bush
had “emphasized the New World Order in a nationally televised address and in his
official letter to Congress.” He said that he was going “to craft a new world
order for the resolution of disputes.”
National Security
Adviser Brent Scowcroft termed the NWO a “defining moment in world history.” Serious thinkers realized that his New World
Order (Novo Ordo Seclorum on our dollar bills) was the first step on the
road to one world government or global governance.
The New
World Order envisioned was developed via United Nations and global
corporations. Technocracy, with the extreme global power it has today, did not
exist in the 1990s.
David Funderburk,
a former Ambassador, wrote at the time that the idea of using United Nations as
a New World Order manager was half-baked since the United Nations was a “hotbed
of KGB spies and Third World anti-American radicals.”
Thinkers quickly
realized that “the old ideas of sovereignty and nationality will
be casualties of the New World Order,” while money managers, global corporations, large
banks, and other financial power centers will control everything from behind
the scenes.
In 1991 David
B. Funderburk asked a very significant question in his book, Betrayal of
America, if the New World Order will put an end to American sovereignty. This
sad reality is unfortunately in development now.
Throughout
history, imposing one’s will on other countries and denying nations the right
to choose their own system of government by interfering in their affairs and
politics has not ended well.
Bush ran
with the NWO idea. The League of Nations was probably the initial promoter of
the NWO notion, to create a “new global political and economic system to
replace the existing one.”
Michael
Collins Piper wrote in “Who’s Behind the New World Order” in 1990 that
U.N. and its promoters from the Council on Foreign Relations played the main role
in Bush’s plans for the New World Order.
Henry
Kissinger was a huge advocate for globalism and the one world government/global
governance. He said in an interview that the challenge will be to maintain the
new balance of power of the New World Order and that peace must be maintained
by “global and regional balances of power.”
The New
World Order was a major step toward one world government/global governance. The
New World Order was not designed to benefit the average, tax paying American, but
the elites and the Marxist billionaires.
Nothing about
the American way of life would be preserved in the NWO: belief in God, the
traditional family, self-worth and dignity, private property, individual
liberties, and the representative Constitutional Republic. Instability would be
planned and directed by government bureaucrats with cooperation from the media’s
disinformation and deception machine.
The Soviets
and all their satellites had advocated for a world government under a Communist
leadership, but it never happened. The greedy American elites today are
advocating the same world government/global governance, and they are succeeding
even though it will spell the end of our American sovereignty.
Samuel
Francis wrote in The Washington Times, Son of New World Order, on
October 24, 1990, “U.N. treaties demand that the United States alter its laws
to suit the demands of a foreign political body.” All treaties, conventions,
and conferences organized by the United Nations over many decades required the
end of national independence.
Mentioned in Francis’ article is a quote by Brian Urquhart, former Under Secretary General for Special Political Affairs at the U.N., “the U.N. should be granted expanded powers to manage vast problems such as global warming, refugees, overpopulation, environmental damage, and the eradication of hunger and disease.” Almost four decades later, it is happening.
Over time, U.S.
politicians have complied with the U.N. dictates, while American citizens
remained powerless to stop it, including the illegal alien invasion of the last
four years. These powers were granted to the U.N. by corrupt politicians.
The end of
separate nations governing their own citizens is here, along with the serious damage
to western civilization. Global governance by elites who know best what is good
for us is threatening our health, survival, and the self-sufficiency of healthy
food production is in serious trouble. We don’t need to eat bugs with the dangerous
chitin which humans cannot digest.
The
existence in the U.N. of Communist tyrants and other dictators ensures that the
scourge of Communism will not be defeated, it will be assisted by Americans and
transferred across the ocean to America. And this has already occurred with the
2020 successful Marxist coup.
The late Henry
Lamb wrote in 2010, “If America is to be free, Americans must rise up and force
the government to abandon its quest for dictatorial power and honor the
limitations on power set forth in the U.S. Constitution.”
Parcelman007 wrote: "Americans are asleep. The whole J6 thing should be an obvious case of a totalitarian government going after anyone (and even their family and associates) who doesn't bow down to them like a lap dog. You have people in jail without a charge who haven't done anything with no trial in sight.
ReplyDeleteThe dems are dictators. Don't be stupid enough to turn your government over to them. Just look at congress. There were RINO's in the republican party. They didn't always vote the party line. There is no such thing in the democratic party. They all vote the party line or pay the price. No freedom in the democratic party."
Gilbertc6 wrote: "Anything that the U.N proposes is meant to rule the world by Islam, they are liars and lie all the time on everything, UMRAW is a prime example of this along with Guiterez and his deep throat of lies. They are not to be trusted on anything."
ReplyDeleteKRdale761 commented: "The UN has been a hot bed of Tyrants for more than 1/2 a century . . .
ReplyDeleteBoth the US and Canada need to stop all support and get the h*ll out of this vile organization.
Push the Building in New York into the River . . ."
Rebel101 wrote: "It's always been about a One World Government no matter what the name is this week. And input from the sheeple was NOT to be allowed, permitted, or accepted!"
ReplyDelete