The concept
of Sustainable Development (SD) was introduced in 1987 at the conference of the
World Commission on Environment and Development, chaired by Gro Harlem
Brundtland, 29th prime minister of Norway. She served three terms.
To achieve SD,
a vague definition was introduced: “Development that meets the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their
own needs.” It is quite vague, leaving room for abuse and constant changes
predicated on a hidden agenda - what needs, whose needs specifically, who
decides, for how long, and what ability of future generations. It can
literally and figuratively be anything the cabal decides in secret. The rest of
the world must obey.
The
blueprint for SD in 1987 became U.N. Agenda 21 in 1992, signed by 179 nations
at the U.N. Conference on Environment and development in Rio. The document was
300 pages long, now more pages have been added.
To
“Americanize” this SD blueprint, President Bill Clinton formed the President’s
Council on Sustainable Development by Executive Order #12852 on June 29, 1993,
with 12 cabinet secretaries, six environmental organizations, i.e., the Nature
Conservancy, the Sierra Club, the International Union for the Conservation of
Nature, and executives from Enron, Browning Ferris, and S.C. Johnson.
Federal
government grants spread Sustainable Development (SD) to all 50 states by
creating a huge group of Sustainable Development
NGOs (non-governmental organizations) and by giving grants directly to cash
starved state and local governments.
The federal
grants provided the funding; NGOs provided the leadership; local
governments provided the targets for change without the knowledge or
vote of the population affected by SD changes.
EPA and other federal agencies awarded
“visioning” grants and “challenge” grants to develop a plan of
action to transform communities across the country into sustainable
development communities.
Universities also received grants dispersed to individual
colleges within each university to teach students about SD.
NGOs (non-governmental organizations) received
grants to work with local governments to create county-wide or region-wide
plans such as Your Town 2024 or Sustainable Your Town or SD
Region X, Y, Z Plan.
Visioning meetings developed comprehensive
plans which included:
-
Nature
preservation
-
Save
the wetland
-
Improve
the wetlands
-
Restrict
development in sensitive areas (they decided what was sensitive)
-
Sustainable
agriculture and farming (no fertilizer, no chemicals)
-
Never
compromise wetlands or wildlife to the detriment of humans living in the area
-
Preservation
of scenic views
-
Designate
scenic highways
-
Development
must be clustered and high rise
-
Rural
village concept (it worked in Sovietized Europe after the Communist Party
confiscated all agricultural land)
-
Smart
growth, planned developments such as 15-minute cities
-
Walkability,
5 minutes from work, play, and school
-
Increased
population density
-
Limit
mobile homes
-
Zoning
to encourage infill
-
More
codes to be enforced
-
Conservation easements on agricultural land (a contract that forbids the landowner to
do anything with the land without the NGO’s permission)
-
Sidewalks,
bike paths, and walking paths
-
Multi-use
trails and corridors that are landscaped
Comprehensive
planning in SD cannot be initiated by the landowners but by the local
community who are told what they need and want by a coalition of international
organizations.
Smart
Growth implies
Land-Use control by the government:
-
1976
U.N. Conference on Human Settlements “D(1)(d) Governments must maintain full
jurisdiction and exercise complete sovereignty over land with a view to freely
planning development of human settlements…”
-
1992
U.N. Conference on Environment & Development “7.30(c) Develop fiscal
incentives and land-use control measures, including land-use planning solutions
for a more rational and environmentally sound use of limited land resources.’
Urban
boundary zones
appear in comprehensive master plans – municipal services such as water, sewer,
fire, and police protection are not provided even though locals pay taxes for
such.
Consensus
of civil society
(who is this civil society always quoted by the U.N. cabal every time they meet
in tropical and very expensive locales where they issue new and revised documents
and regulations) never includes locals who are affected by these comprehensive
plans developed by outsiders.
Farmers know
their land and treasure it. They know how to protect their resources because
their livelihood depends on it. They don’t need outsiders telling them how to
farm and where.
Government-managed
societies end in environmental degradation, misuse of resources, greater
division of economic classes, and hopelessness for the government-dependent
poor. I know because I have experienced it. “Life is always better when people
cooperate rather than a few try to dominate and control.”
Global
governance using
environmentalism as a tool started probably in 1891 when Cecil
Rhodes asserted that the entire globe should be governed by the British Empire.
How convenient to colonize the entire planet! Which is exactly what the
globalist cabal wants to do.
Two weeks
after Pearl Harbor Roosevelt used the term United Nations for the first time in
his “Declaration of the United Nations.”
At about the
same time, Professor Quincy Wright predicted the U.N. when he described in the Baltimore
News Post a “Commission to Study the Organization of Peace”. United Nations
became everything but an organization of peace.
Rachel
Carson, another doomsayer, wrote Silent Spring and her infamous book
convinced an entire generation that we are poisoning and destroying the earth.
In my 21st
century America, I hear and see thousands of birds every year in the vicinity
of our suburban home. Incidentally, the U.N. Agenda 2030 cabal wants to forbid
suburbia while busy cutting down forests to make paper and carboard boxes and burying CO2 pipelines (to mitigate the faux global warming), denying the gas of
plant life to billions of trees that need to be replenished after so much paper
use instead of the much-maligned plastics.
The real
goal of SD is to reduce and control the earth’s population drastically because they
are producing too much carbon. How paying a tax for said carbon is going to save
the planet and offsetting CO2 production is never explained. But, one of the
cabal members spoke openly that those citizens who cannot afford to travel
anywhere can sell their potential carbon footprint to those citizens who are
rich and can afford to go places and spew more carbon in the atmosphere with
their jets and yachts.
Obviously, SD
is a huge scam for power and control by the rich globalist cabal. It has
nothing to do with the environment. If it did, the rich would be out there
cleaning the environment polluted by China, India, and other poor countries
that do not have a functioning garbage disposal plan, they use rivers and
oceans to dispose of their trash.
If the cabal
cared about the environment, they would not pay billions of dollars to spray daily
our atmosphere with chemicals and chalk on their belief that blocking out the
sun will mitigate the damage done by their global warming/climate change
industry. In the process, they are harming mother nature, the weather, the
climate, the food, water, and oxygen supply of the planet, killing animals and
people.
"Preservation of scenic views." They missed on this one with all the windmills ruining senic views. In addition, as I understand it, they've turned their heads on the environmental disaster at the US southern border with all the trash there.
ReplyDeleteGood points, Marijane!
Delete