The New American flag
Wikipedia Commons Photo
|
Western politicians, diplomats, heads
of state, and other EU officials have agreed and signed on to U.N.’s Agenda
2030, a social engineering plan of population control; this includes every
aspect of their daily lives and all business activity.
This onerous U.N. Agenda 2030, for
which no “global citizens” have voted, had been deployed around the globe at
the beginning of the Obama administration and had accelerated the “fundamental
transformation of America” he had promised before he took office.
The massive exodus of third world
populations, Muslims, Africans, Central Americans, Asians, and Middle Easterners,
mostly young men, to Europe and to the United States has been socially
engineered by the United Nations and by the IOM office, a U.N. affiliate, with
the blessing of EU leaders, government officials at all levels, and many presidents.
When the current batch of politicians
of all stripes will be long gone, a borderless America will be drastically
different and unrecognizable to the present generations. The left has won the battle
and the war for the hearts and minds of “progressive” America.
Rep. Ocasio-Cortez (NY-D) compares the
situation on the U.S. southern border where migrants are housed, awaiting the
disposition of their illegal crossing into the U.S., with a “concentration
camp.”
The housing facilities are clean,
serve three free meals a day, clean showers, TVs, pool tables, soccer, play
areas, toys, clean clothes, medical care, and other amenities. These illegal migrants have broken our laws when
crossing the border and are demanding asylum.
It is an insult to Holocaust survivors
to diminish the hell, torture, and suffering they endured at the hands of their
Nazi captors who brought them into concentration camps by train to force them into
dehumanizing work, starvation, and eventual genocide as part of Hitler’s final
solution.
To paraphrase Daniel Krygier, when the
West colonized the East, it was called “imperialism.” But now that the Muslim East
is colonizing the West with the blessing of the U.N.’s International Office for
Migration (IOM), it is called “multiculturalism.”
If we defend Western nations and our sovereignty,
we are “racists” even though border protection from enemy invasion has nothing to
do with skin color. But those who “embrace despotic and xenophobic Muslim
societies that oppress women, gays, and minorities,” call themselves “progressives”
and “human rights champions.”
It is fine to criticize Israel, its
existence, and “other free societies,” but when we criticize oppressive,
totalitarian and terrorist-sponsoring societies, then we are Islamophobic and
hate mongers.
The Orwellian dystopia of “1984” Eric
Arthur Blair wrote about in 1949 is alive and well today. His invented
diabolical social world order took 70 years to become reality.
Self-appointed global leaders have met
on June 18, 2019 in Brussels to debate their planned migratory invasion which
they call “forced displacement.” It is tied in very closely with their 17
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of Agenda 2030.
Moderator of the debates was Marta
Foresti, Principal Research Fellow and Director of the Overseas Development
Institute’s (ODI) Human Mobility Initiative. The ODI is self-described as the
U.K.’s leading independent think tank on international development and
humanitarian issues. One of the goals of the Human Mobility Initiative is to
shape global migration narratives.
“The 2030 Agenda represents the first time
that migration, mobility and global inequality are interlinked under the global
development framework. While debate has often focused on the needs of the most
vulnerable migrants, less discussed is the decisive role that migrants and
forcibly displaced populations play in achieving the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs), especially when it comes to their contribution to the host
communities.”
I am not sure how the migrants
sneaking into our country illegally across the southern border or brought in by
buses and planes by non-governmental organizations (NGOs), with the knowledge
and blessing of our own government which gives them the money to settle these
“refugees,” constitutes displacement and how they contribute to our unwilling
“host” communities. These individuals become welfare recipients as soon as they
are enrolled for all handouts our government can provide, to the detriment of
our poor citizens and veterans who must struggle to find and pay for medical
care and housing.
Organizations
participating in this event include:
-
the
International Organization for Migration (IOM)
-
International
Rescue Committee (IRC)
-
High
Commissioner of the U.N. Refugee Agency (UNHCR)
-
the
European Commission
The event is organized
by:
-
the
International Organization for Migration (IOM)
-
the
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
-
the
International Rescue Committee (IRC)
-
the
Danish Refugee Council (DRC).
Antonio Vitorino said, “By
embracing this reality, we can open up the potential for migrants to be agents
of change at local, national, and global levels. Safe, orderly, and regular
migration can be a powerful force to truly ensure that no one is left behind.”
How exactly is our
problem to make sure that no one is left behind? Is it not the problem of their
governments to provide for the welfare of their citizens? We certainly send
enough humanitarian aid to many third world nations. Why must we foot the bill
for all their failures on a personal and national level? Are women not
accepting their submissive and second-class citizen role and do they not
continue that submission even when they migrate to western and free societies?
“Women and girls in crisis are suffering a double disadvantage – because of where they live and because of their gender. It’s clear that the humanitarian sector needs to take more seriously the inequalities of power between men and women that drive unequal outcomes. The sector should try to create a double dividend – tackling the symptoms of disadvantage, as well as the power imbalances that generate them – by setting clear targets for women and girls in crisis as part of the Sustainable Development Goals and establishing a sector-wide Gender Equality Scorecard with shared metrics for success.” (David Miliband, IRC President and CEO)
It is important to note
that there are few women and girls among the throng of male economic invaders. They
do not seem to have suffered much in their countries as they are well dressed, fed,
clean, and sporting the latest electronic gadgets, including expensive iPhones.
Kelly T. Clements, Deputy High Commissioner for the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) made remarks about “the critical role of development actors to include refugees as important contributors to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in host countries.”
Kelly T. Clements, Deputy High Commissioner for the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) made remarks about “the critical role of development actors to include refugees as important contributors to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in host countries.”
Why must we accept these
17 SDG goals which were developed mostly by U.N. representatives from third
world countries interested in the redistribution of western wealth, supposedly
worried about the fate of our globally warming planet which humans allegedly
caused.
And speaking of
population control, western nations already engage in demographic suicide through
low birth rates while third world nations have much higher birthrates.
At the end of the day, no
matter what euphemisms the U.N. and its affiliated NGOs create and use, the forced
global migration and the forced flooding of the west with people inimical to our
civilized society and to Christianity, are forms of population control. You
will be socially engineered as U.N. desires, you will give up your hard-earned
wealth to those less fortunate and less hard-working than you, give up your sovereignty,
and you will like it.
Ah, the very name, International Organization for Migration was a big clue. The tell-tale preposition: 'for'.
ReplyDeleteYes, and we will like it. Sadly, many Americans will accept it.
ReplyDeleteI got flack at Canada Free Press and on Foccacia Book from some die-hard Trump supporters that, no, he is the only one trying to send illegals captured back through ICE. Obviously they did not read the article careful enough. The migrants I was talking about are those "refugees" in numbers dictated by the IOM via the United Nations. Obama got us into this agreement with the U.N.'s International Office of Migration and Trump continued the practice. I am not sure why he did not end it because I am not sure that the U.S. Ambassador answers to Congress or to the president's office. So, I am not sure how easily it would be for him to extricate the U.S. out of this disastrous migratory compact, however, since it is happening under his watch too, he IS responsible as well.
ReplyDeleteReaders were referring to illegals who enter the U.S. by their own accord, brought in by NGO caravans or by coyotes. It is this group that President Trump is trying to send back through ICE. Big difference!