Martha Boneta at Liberty Farm Photo credit: Susan Lider |
Martha Boneta, who was instrumental in passing the two bills
now dubbed Boneta Bill-1 and Boneta Bill-2, bought a farm that had a
conservation easement which was administered by the Piedmont Environmental
Council, a non-governmental organization, and the Virginia Outdoors Foundation,
a state government agency.
The Piedmont Environmental Council is a conservation group
that holds 51 easements on 7,600 acres of land in Virginia. According to Kevin
Mooney, when Boneta bought her farm in 2006, “she did not receive either tax
breaks or money.”
Boneta purchased her 64-acre Liberty Farm in Paris,
Virginia, from the Piedmont Environmental Council with the easement already in
place from the previous owner. For eight years, Boneta fought the PEC’s frequent
farm and intrusive closet inspections, video and photographic surveillance, and
other forms of excessive harassment.
Bryant Osborn wrote in Culpeper Star Exponent, “Martha has
charged that PEC has trespassed repeatedly on her farm and has attempted to
drive her off the farm through unwarranted and overly invasive conservation
easement inspections, and an IRS audit she says was instigated by one of PEC’s
board members.”
Susan Lider said in a press release, “PEC was caught on
video engaging in abusive inspections that involved interrogations and demands
to inspect closets, attics, and even photographing the farmer’s laundry.”
The Boneta Bill 1, HB 268, which became law in Virginia with
bipartisan support on July 1, 2014, protects “certain activities at
agricultural operations from local regulation in the absence of substantial
impacts on the public welfare.” This is meant to protect farmers like Martha from
intrusive local governments that can go to excessive lengths to harass and
prevent an honest farmer from engaging in simple farm activities such as growing
organic vegetables, selling sheared wool, and jars of honey.
The Boneta Bill 2, HB 1488, which passed both houses in
February 2015, and is awaiting the governor’s action by March 29, 2015, “allows
a landowner or other party to a conservation easement to request that the
Virginia Land Conservation Foundation use the Administrative Dispute Resolution
Act to resolve a dispute relating to the interpretation of the easement.” If
and when the bill is signed by the governor, it would control land trusts that
currently have few standards, predictability, accountability, consistency, or
transparency.
Martha Boneta’s farm has been in the crosshairs of PEC from
the beginning but she has not given up. After a November 6, 2014 hearing in
front of the Virginia Outdoors Foundation, a motion to take over all easement enforcement,
if both Martha Boneta and PEC agreed, resulted in a trustee vote of 6-0 to
approve a resolution. The VOF was chartered by the Virginia General Assembly in
1966 to promote land conservation and to monitor easements.
If you might think that Boneta’s troubles are over, you
would be wrong. Kevin Mooney reported
that, on December 10, 2014, the PEC’s attorney sent an email to the Virginia
Outdoors Foundation declining the amendment proposed by VOF on grounds that it “would
likely confer improper private benefits”
to Martha Boneta.
In the face of this “preposterous” claim, Bonner Cohen of
the National Center for Public Policy said, “For eight years, she has been
subjected to harassment and humiliation by the PEC’s reckless enforcement of
the easement, and she has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending
herself. Whatever the original intent of Virginia’s conservation easement
statute, the PEC’s well-documented deplorable behavior calls out for the
General Assembly to reform the program, lest other landowners be subjected to
the hell she has gone through.”
Back to square one, Martha Boneta refiled a lawsuit in
Fauquier County Circuit Court on March 4, 2015 against PEC, the non-profit land
trust in which she alleges that “PEC colluded with realtors and government
officials to issue zoning citations against her property in order to force her
into selling her farm.” Martha Boneta had withdrawn the original lawsuit in
order to allow the opportunity of mediation. Since the mediation has failed,
she refiled her lawsuit.
According to a press release of March 5, 2015, “Martha also is
considering filing a second lawsuit at the federal level against PEC, based on
the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, commonly known as RICO.”
New evidence emerged that constitutes the basis of the
federal RICO lawsuit. In the signed and filed versions of the easement, PEC
makes the claim that Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson, the Confederate War General,
encamped on Martha’s property on the evening of July 18, 1861. According to the
press release, “Historical accounts of Jackson’s movements in Fauquier County
place the encampment at another location.” https://books.google.com/books?id=IZI_y8Td5HUC&pg=PA70&lpg=PA70&dq=%22STonewall+Jackson%22+Paris%2c+Virginia%22&source=bl&ots=2fmgq8IkxJ&sig=CWgTBXszYAzp-eejTIl_M-OHFC8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=ujzTVMbZLMehgwTAkYPQBw&ved=0CGgQ6AEwDA#v=onepage&q=%22STonewall%20Jackson&f=false
The press release continues, PEC “makes a similar historical
claim about Jackson’s whereabouts in the easement documents it has associated
with Ovoka Farm, also located in Paris, but on a separate parcel of land from
Liberty Farm.” https://vof.app.box.com/s/tycexiapro4vhkl9smsvflfwp7oae7kd/1/2913997329/24711587393/1
This historical connection with Gen. Thomas “Stonewall”
Jackson hyped the price of Liberty Farm beyond its actual value, thus Boneta
paid $425,000 in 2006. She lost revenue for two years when she was told to
fence off 18 acres of the Oak Grove section of the property where no farming
was allowed because of the stated connection with the now-debunked historical encampment.
Stay tuned for the next development from Liberty Farm,
Virginia, where a determined American is fighting for her farming rights and
indirectly ours against a well-funded environmental goliath.
Copyright: Ileana Johnson 2015
Copyright: Ileana Johnson 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment