In 2013, sixty-two percent of Americans have not heard of Common Core. Ian A. Reid set out to change that. He directed the best documentary on the National Common Core Standards, “Building the Machine.” www.CommonCoreMovie.com
The national teaching
standards were adopted by 45 states without parental or teacher input, under
confidentiality agreements, without public debate, untested, untried, unproven,
and certainly not “internationally benchmarked” as is now promoted in non-stop
ads or “state-led.”
The bait for adoption was
the $4.35 billion worth of grants offered through the President’s stimulus
package. States had two months to write proposals in order to be eligible for
the Race to the Top grants. Hurting for money because the economy was so
depressed, 45 states applied and, in doing so, they accepted the Race to the
Top Standards.
The standards, which were to become Common Core standards were not debated, “the drafts were cloaked,” there were no hearings, no testimony, just “some truncated public comments and no response to comments.”
“The Common Core standards
were designed for an industrial model school,” claiming that they are “rigorous,
even though they can’t tell you what makes for rigorous or non-rigorous
standards.” Marc Tucker believes that they are designed for “work force
development in the German model system.” Andrew Hacker, Professor Emeritus at
Queens College, called Common Core standards, “a radical change from the past.”
According to the documentary,
the “players” involved in developing, funding, adopting, and advertising
national Common Core standards were:
-
Achieve, Inc.
-
Fordham Institute
-
The National
Governors Association
-
Council of Chief
State School Officers
-
U.S. Department
of Education
-
Foundation for
Excellence in Education
-
U.S. Chamber of
Commerce
-
45 governors
-
Jeb Bush
-
Mike Huckabee
-
School Officers
-
Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation (donated $200 million in 2012 alone to adopt Common Core)
The Validation Committee
was composed of 30 people who had to sign a confidentiality agreement that they
would not discuss what took place in the meetings. (Sandra Stotsky)
Five committee members, a
significant percentage, did not sign the final standards and were thus “expunged
from the record.” Dr. Jim Milgram said, “They are not giving the public any
idea of what’s going on.” Dr. Milgram and Dr. Stotsky were the only
mathematician and English language arts content specialists on the 30-person
validation committee. Neither approved the standards.”
Dr. Jim Milgram objected
to forcing college presidents to accept students from any high school who had
passed algebra, without any remedial math courses. According to statistics from
the National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, in 2010 “over 40
percent of college freshmen specifically need remedial mathematics and over 60
percent of new college students need remediation of some sort.”
Dr. Milgram believes that
the long-term effect of non-remediation is that college course content will
have to drop in order to meet the lower quality of students coming in from
k-12, in essence dumbing down the college mathematics curriculum.
The much advertised “college
readiness” with Common Core is not going to be good enough for STEM (an acronym
that refers to the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics),
not good enough for selective colleges, it is going to be barely enough for a
community college. But everybody can get into a community college. Common Core
standards are not standards for excellence or competitive colleges, they are
for mediocrity.
Ze’ev Wurman, 2010 member of
CA Academic Content Standards Commission and former U.S. Department of
Education official, argues that a student cannot be prepared for both “college
and career readiness” as Common Core advertises. Declaring by fiat that
everybody is “college and career ready” is “untenable,” in his opinion. Not all
children want to go to college or should. Some children are better suited for a
vocational career.
According to the documentary,
the “Lead Common Core Standards writer, David Coleman, became president of the
College Board in the fall of 2012. In 2013, the College Board began to simplify
the material on the SAT exams and all AP courses to match the Common Core.”
Michael Farris, J.D.,
LL.M., founder of the Home School Legal Defense Association, admits that David
Coleman has some good ideas in education. What Michael Farris disagrees with is
the fact that “David Coleman wants to use the force of law to require everybody
to implement his ideas of education.”
Dr. Stotsky, who grew up
in a small town in Massachusetts, believes in “independent citizens who choose for
themselves,” people who don’t need a “monarch and a central planner” but
self-government. “Central planners are people who like power; they think they
are an elite who knows how to run other people’s lives.”
Dr. Andrew Hacker,
Professor Emeritus of Political Science at Queens College, said that 22 percent
of 9th graders do not finish high school. Many variables contribute
to a student’s success; however, the most important is parental involvement.
Alternate high schools in
Finland and Germany offer 8 different tracks for graduation in order to better
match the students’ interests, talent, ability, and motivation. “Duncan [Secretary
of Education] does not like that approach because it leaves choices up to kids,”
said Dr. Stotsky. “They want a centralized system where things are directed by
people like them who think they know better what’s good for other people’s
children.”
Wayne Brasler, Veteran
Journalism Teacher, University of Chicago Lab Schools, explained that one
standard for all is a ‘dead end.’ “It is stereotyping people that everyone
wants to go to college, have the same career, same ability, same interests, and
you are not worthwhile if you don’t do this.”
Dr. Andrew Hacker opined
that “McGraw-Hill, Pearson, Gates, really regard education as a production line
in which they are going to take little human beings and make them college or
career ready.” Are these not our children, should we not have a say in what
they learn? Is it the government’s right to teach our children what the
government thinks our children should know?
Home-schooled children will
not be insulated from this mediocre national curriculum. They will be affected because
colleges, tests, and curriculum will be aligned with Common Core Standards.
Ian A. Reid, the director
of the documentary, Building the Machine,
wrote, “Lead writers of the Common Core, David Coleman, Susan Pimentel, and
Jason Zimba, were asked to defend the standards in the film. Two declined, one
never replied.”
American colleges were
once the envy of the world. If we cut out chunks of mathematics that have been taught
for 100 years, without proper research and testing, chances are great that we
will no longer be the exceptional higher education bastion.
Quantifying everything
will result in teaching to the standards in order to get the right score. Wayne
Brasler thinks that “Systematization, centralization, and data collection are
not good for the public schools but David Coleman believes so.”
Replacing basic arithmetic
(addition, subtraction, multiplication) with Constructivism, teaching children how to “construct” their own way of figuring out an answer, even if it’s
the wrong answer, and replacing English literature selections with New Criticism Literary Analysis, using
leftwing norms of morality and behavior, appears to be a recipe for mediocrity.
We are a diverse nation
populated by individuals with different talents, ability, IQ, motivation, interests,
and dissimilar childhood experiences. Some children live on farms and some in
the cities, some are affluent and some are not.
College should help Americans
become life-long learners, not ideological robots. Education should be about
our children, not the “system.” Paul Horton, Veteran History Teacher,
University of Chicago Lab Schools, thinks that the “Current policy makers see
the purpose of education as training people to acquire the minimum level of
skills that are required to work in a technical workplace.”
We are not trying to win a
race, we are trying to pursue happiness and keep our constitutional republic intact
and safe. What race are we supposed to win and against whom?
No comments:
Post a Comment