The
Merriam-Webster Dictionary lists “sustain” as “to give support or relief to, to
nourish, to keep up, prolong. The Barnhart Etymological Dictionary (p. 1098)
gives its Latin root of “sustinere”
as “to hold up, keep up, support, endure,” as a variant to hold.
The
word “sustainability” is another matter. It seems that environmentalists with a
certain agenda have written the definition in Webster’s. Sustainable, besides
“capable of being sustained,” is also a “method of harvesting or using a
resource so that the resource is not depleted or permanently damaged,
sustainable techniques, sustainable agriculture, and a lifestyle involving the
use of sustainable methods.”
Wikipedia
is even bolder and more complex in their definition of sustainability – they are shamelessly preaching U.N. Agenda 21
goals. “Achieving sustainability will enable the earth to continue supporting
human life.” I am not sure how the earth supported human life for eons, it must
have been sheer luck, we cannot leave it to chance, and it must be controlled
by the environmental non-government powers with plenty of government funding
and regulations. Today we are doomed to fail miserably without sustainability.
Wikipedia broadly explains and describes sustainability
as:
-
Wetlands
-
Diversity
-
Eco-economics
-
Urban
planning
-
Lifestyles
-
Ethical
consumerism
-
Eco-villages
-
Eco-municipalities
-
Sustainable
cities
-
Permaculture
-
Green
building
-
Sustainable
agriculture
-
Green
technologies
-
Renewable
energy
-
Sustainable
fission
-
Fusion
power
-
Sustainable
engineering
-
Sustainable
forestry
-
Environmental
management
-
Environmental
science
-
Earth
science
-
Conservation
biology
-
Human
consumption and resources
In
addition to controlling the frightened low information humans into the green
compliance and indoctrinating the next generation into the smart growth of
green, there are fortunes to be made from the sustainability schemes and scams at the expense of the middle class:
carbon taxes, carbon swaps, carbon footprint, electric cars, wind and solar
energy generation, expensive regulations filling the coffers of government bureaucracies,
of unions, and of a few elites who push the green scam zealously.
Since
1987, Sustainable Development of U.N. Agenda 21 has turned every economic
activity possible into Sustainable Everything, from education to food. My local
diner advertises food cooked with sustainable turkeys.
At
the center of Sustainable Development are public policy objectives to “protect
the environment, control economic development, and promote social equity.” Who
can argue with protecting the environment and who does not want a pristine
environment? It is how the environment will be protected to the detriment of
humans, the economic control and the social equity goals that disturb higher
information Americans.
Global
warming is a political movement solidified by U.N. Agenda 21 to bring about
global justice, equality, and wealth redistribution, power to a handful of global
elites, total economic control, and population reduction to the levels that
“consensus” scientists and journalists, who manufacture temperature data and
misinformation, deem necessary to gain control of the uninformed and frightened
masses.
The
hoax of global warming as a political movement will bring about the fundamental
transformation of America promised to us during the presidential campaign, the new
world order/global governance.
Vice
President Joe Biden said on April 5, 2013 at the Export-Import Bank conference
in Washington, “The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new
world order because the global order is changing again and the institutions of
the world that worked so well in the post-World War II era for decades, they
need to be strengthened and some have to be changed.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76Ombbyo0CA
“No
matter if the science of global warming is all phony…climate change provides
the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
(Christine Stewart, former Canadian Minister of the Environment)
If
the MSM repeats in tandem bold lies and misinformation enough times and with
confidence, “It does not matter what is true, it only matters what people believe
is true.” (Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace)
“We’ve
got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is
wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental
policy.” (Timothy Wirth, President of the U.N. Foundation)
Paying
a tax to reduce carbon footprint is meant to alleviate the guilt of the elites,
liberals, politicians, the rich, and the hypocritical Hollywood who have not
stopped “polluting” with their jets, huge mansions, and excessive, in your face,
lifestyles. But the majority of middle class Americans can ill-afford these
taxes.
Sustainable
Development will solidify global governance as promoted by the World Core
Curriculum. According to James Lovelock’s Gaia Hypothesis, “the earth is a
living organism, the giver of life, every species is equal in value, and that
both animate and inanimate objects have rights.”
Dr.
Robert Muller, who developed the World Core Curriculum, claims that “every
member of every species is a cell in the global organism and that the evolution
of the United Nations represents the development of the earth’s brain.” (http://freedom.org/reports/ggreligion.htm)
This
curriculum teaches students that it is a sin to cut down a tree, that animals
have rights, and humans (Americans in particular) are “killing” the earth by
burning fossil fuels. God is greatly ridiculed and the faithful are
marginalized. The “Earth Charter,” which seeks to replace the Ten Commandments
with a global green religion, was promoted by Maurice Strong and Michael
Gorbachev.
Maurice
Strong, “a native Canadian who is widely deemed to be one of the key
instigators of the global environmental movement, living a low-profile in China
for the past half-decade,” is considered “the godfather of global environmentalism
and organizer of the United Nations’ 1992 Rio environmental Earth Summit.” (George
Russell, Godfather of Global Green Thinking Steps out of Shadows at Rio+20, Fox
News Insider, June 20, 2012)
How
will new world order/global governance be achieved through the political
movement of Sustainable Development Everything? Aside from academic indoctrination
into the scam of green, man-made global warming hoax, and learned helplessness,
a massive change of zoning laws, severe regulations and restrictions of land
use, home building, energy consumption, consumerism, fossil fuels exploration
and use, visioning committees at local levels will change the face of western
countries through “regional” shadow governments, unelected individuals who will
dictate policy on every economic issue. “Regionalism must precede globalism. We
foresee a seamless system of governance from local communities, individual
states, regional unions and up through to the United Nations itself.” (U.N.
Commission on Global Governance)
Various
executive orders and laws have established regionalism and have already
implemented U.N. Agenda 21 goals of Sustainable Development. There is no
federal government body left that does not have plans for Sustainable
Development. Most universities now offer degrees or have professorial chairs in
Sustainable Development. Job titles have been renamed to contain the words
“green growth” or “sustainable.”
We’ve
reached this point of no return with the help of left wing journalists who have
abandoned any pretense of objectivity. They are nothing but the propaganda wing
of the Democrat Party - Democrat operatives, propagandists, political
commentators, and lobbyists, politicizing anything that will grow the socialist
government, including the manufactured science of global warming.
In
criticizing and ridiculing global warming skeptics, disingenuous journalists
cite the “science consensus,” not bothering to explain that science is exact,
not a consensus. Conveniently forgotten is the fact that debunked scientists with
an agenda (such as those at the University of East Anglia) promoted the false notion
of man-made global warming by deleting data from climate computer models that
contradicted their hypothesis.
No comments:
Post a Comment