Over the years my students wondered
why there are so many different categories of people in our society and why are
we not designated as Americans, why the hyphenated Americans? Why is it
necessary to classify people into so many categories based on skin color,
geographical location, ethnicity, and other subcategories that seem to be
useful only to politicians, the census, academia, and to layers of government.
They opined that bureaucrats with an agenda, using our own tax dollars, keep Americans
divided and at intolerable odds with each other.
But humans themselves have a desire to
self-segregate into groups based on race, ethnicity, and other elements they
perceive to have in common with the group or the tribe. Outwardly they declare
that they want integration and will go to great lengths to achieve that goal
only to reverse it when it is most convenient to them.
Wondering if such an America is worth
saving, a conservative radio talk show host recently posed an interesting
rhetorical question, “What is America?” His answer gave me serious pause and annoyed
me.
He explained that America is an idea
that only poets could create, and proceeded to explain the composition of
America’s population (race, sex, ethnicity, religion) as part of this idea. He
was reluctant to place Americans into distinct race categories, which were
constructs invented by academia and politicians to differentiate people of
varying skin colors and geographical origins. The host explained that the
majority of the American population is still of European descent, but was uneasy
about calling them white. Perhaps Caucasian might suffice?
Yes, we are of European descent, but
we are not Irish-Americans, German-Americans, or Italian-Americans. The media
may describe them as such but Irish, Spanish, German, etc. are nationalities,
just like we are all Americans, no hyphenation. They exist because their
nations exist.
Let me clarify for him that America is
a nation with distinct borders until Democrats and globalists started to
erase U.S. borders, reinterpreted immigration rules in the courts and laxed
enforcement of borders, claiming that our immigration is broken. Of course, nothing is broken, politicians are
not enforcing existing immigration laws to the benefit of cheap labor and the expansion
of Democrat voting rolls.
The citizens living within our borders
are called Americans, that is our nationality. Nationality is not
watered down just because people from other countries come here legally and
become naturalized American citizens. It tends to become less valuable when
illegals flood our borders, demand equal rights with American citizens, and
have anchor babies who become immediate American citizens, while legal
immigrants are patiently waiting far away the dispensation of their legal
petitions to become Americans.
Those who come here illegally are not
undocumented Americans as the lefties lovingly call them, they are the citizens
of their home-countries from which they fled.
American citizens speak American
English (although not the official language of the U.S.). We are ethnically
diverse and most tolerant of other nationalities and races than any other
nation on earth - until recently, that is, when Democrats decided to start a
race war and bring back slavery to the 21st century in order to
claim financial reparations they are not entitled to. They claim that America
is a racist country and capitalism has failed them miserably therefore they
want it replaced with socialism/communism.
It is so easy for liberals to blame
their woes on others instead of looking at their Marxist ideology, their lack
of personal responsibility, and their disastrous choices in life as their own
failings, not the shortcomings of the other side they so profoundly despise.
Humans have tried to segregate from other
humans for centuries, using tribal affiliations, geographical location, bizarre
concepts, cranium size, skin color, and many skeletal differentiations as
revealed in this article. https://www.britannica.com/topic/race-human/Modern-scientific-explanations-of-human-biological-variation
Modern
and current race and ethnicity standards were determined by the U.S. Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and were published in 1997. The five contemporary race
categories, seemingly arbitrary, and their definitions are:
·
American Indian or Alaska Native: A person having origins in any
of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America),
and who maintains tribal affiliation or community attachment.
(Where exactly does the
Senator from Massachusetts fit in this definition?)
·
Asian: A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the
Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including Cambodia, China,
India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and
Vietnam.
·
Black or African American: A person having origins in any
of the black racial groups of Africa.
(And if DNA proves that
they do not have origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa, what are they?)
·
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander: A person having origins
in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific
Islands.
(What if persons are born
and raised in those areas for generations, but are white? What are they?)
·
White: A person having origins in any of the original peoples of
Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa.
The identified ethnicities by the OMB
are:
·
Hispanic or Latino: A person of Cuban, Mexican,
Puerto Rican, South or Central American, or other Spanish culture or origin,
regardless of race. The term, "Spanish origin," can be used in
addition to "Hispanic or Latino.”
(This definition is
curious as Latium was the region of Ancient Rome, the heart of the Roman
Empire. What the nationalities listed above have to do with Rome other than
Latin language roots, is unclear.)
·
Not Hispanic or Latino
(So other groups of Americans
who come from an equally strong ethnic background are just lumped in together
for political expediency?)
According to a recent article by Daniel Greenfield,
“Maintaining
its proud commitment to printing all the news that will divide Americans by
race, sex, and creed, the New York Times published a list of what it claimed were the “922 of
the most powerful people in America” while claiming that only 20% of them are
people of color.”
Greenfield wrote that “The New York
Times’ message is that Muslims are “people of color” and Christians
aren’t. It doesn’t matter if their families might have lived some 20 minutes
away from each other. Arab Christians are white while Arab Muslims are a
minority group.” https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2020/09/arab-muslims-are-people-color-arab-christians-are-daniel-greenfield/?fbclid=IwAR2IHSjMscUK-1xiLOQsUyevtN1XgBbh9exqdXzWvPJ1EtbWq1WKIBkWQkg#.X2rcvz990B4.facebook
Given that Americans are so naïve and utterly divided by their own
corrupt government, the main stream media, academia, and
billionaires with globalist Marxist causes and money to burn, is America likely
to survive in its current form?
Will America as a nation morph into a globalist Marxist society in
which all American citizens and illegals hiding in plain sight with voting
rights and generous welfare become subjects to the whims of the billionaire technocrats
who will control everything, including the three branches of the lawless centralized
government?