|
Photo: Ileana Johnson 2016 |
Competition for
survival and success are inscribed in our DNA. We are born to compete. Humans
who put forth more effort are more likely to succeed. Others are satisfied with
less, act accordingly, become followers, and complain bitterly about the
eventual outcome and their station in life.
Even animals
in the wild compete for survival; some develop special skills that allow them
to rule over an area or a pride, and other animals of the same species recognize
and yield to their superiority.
But in the
human world government, with input from the vaunted halls of academia, has
passed laws, imposing societal ascendency based on skin color, ethnicity, and a
certain socio-economic background, not necessarily on meritocracy.
“Meritocracy
is a political philosophy holding that power should be vested in individuals
almost exclusively based on ability and talent. Advancement in such a system is
based on performance measured through examination and/or demonstrated
achievement in the field where it is implemented.” (Wikipedia’s definition)
Merriam-Webster
defines meritocracy as “a system in which the talented are chosen and moved
ahead on the basis of their achievement” and “leadership selected on the basis
of intellectual criteria.” But liberals demand vociferously that “diversity”
and non-Caucasians must be chosen over scholarly meritocracy in all fields of endeavor.
First used
in 1958, meritocracy refers linguistically to the power of merit. “An anti-meritocratic system would reward the
undeserving.” Being undeserving could also be argued about nepotism and about
those with seniority who may or may not be more meritorious than others.
A bogus “white
privilege” created by academia is blamed for all societal ills and for the
inability of certain groups to be in charge exclusively and for some
individuals to succeed. In their twisted economic view, the choices that an
individual makes in life, the academic and technical preparation for the real
world, experience in a certain field, investment in human capital, should not
count at all. The only things that must matter are race and gender.
When someone
is admitted to college based on family tradition, the amount of money a family donates
to an endowment, relatives and close friends, that is not merit, it is nepotism.
When someone is admitted based on their race, ethnicity, or their
socio-economic background that is affirmative action and quotas. It is
certainly not meritocracy.
I personally
prefer to be helped by someone who acquired degrees and skills based on their
merit. I want to be treated by a doctor who passed exams without correction to
his/her scores based on race, who learned his/her trade by being at the top of
his/her class, based on merit. I want a real engineer to build our roads and bridges,
not a community organizer. I want to fly on a plane built and serviced by
someone who studied real math, not Common Core math.
Just because
you cannot pass a science, math, or high school chemistry class but excel in
community organizing or theater does not mean that everyone else should follow
your communist “lead.”
You can’t
build a society on Marxist utopian ideology, it has been tried around the world
and the 100 million innocents who died as tortured and starved subjects of this
tyrannical ideology are turning in their graves right now seeing the
Millennials who are yearning for Bernie Sanders’ socialism and Mao’s communism.
You cannot
survive with community organizing and gender confusion studies. If you don’t
want to starve, others must be responsible adults to produce the food you
consume, the lattes you drink, the precision electronic gadgets you use, and
the cars you disdain hypocritically. Someone responsible must know how to build
your houses to last, your yachts, your planes, your boats, your private jets,
your computers, and all the things the duplicitous rich consume while telling
us to downsize our lives to shipping containers in order to save the planet.
Some succeed
in life based on genetic looks, genetic athleticism, inheritance, ethnicity, or
the color of their skin, but others have to work hard to make progress on their
own merit and ability.
As
advertised in the proposed course at UC, indicators of “white culture” are
“individualism, consumerism, meritocracy as an ideal, superficiality,
competition, ambition, productivity, [and] extreme exploitation of
labor/resources for profit.”
In this course,
in which collectivism and racism are center stage, groups must learn to work
together in order to “interrupt white privilege and racism in their immediate
environments.” The organizers have created another fascistic venue to express
insane and irrational hate against the western civilization that pays
everybody’s bills, and against white people.
The
socialism that took roots in Germany in the 1930s brainwashed the youth to
implement their desires to restrict free speech, gun ownership, and other
freedoms that interfered with their ideas of a dictatorship of the
oppressed.
Presently,
schools and universities in this country have entrenched political correctness
(PC) into our culture, forcing the masses to speak and behave a certain way
lest they be marginalized, converting Americans into “idealized citizens,” a
mirror of Germany’s “brown shirts.” If challenged on these issues, the PC crowd
labels the challengers “fascists” when in reality the PC enforcers are the
fascists.
In a column
written on February 27, 1982, titled Susan
Sontag Provokes Debate on Communism, Sontag is quoted as saying in a February
6 speech at Town Hall, “I would contend that what they illustrate is a truth
that we should have understood a very long time ago: that communism is fascism –
successful fascism, if you will.”
The same
tactic was used during the Russian revolution, during the collapse of
Venezuela, and during Pol Pot’s government in Cambodia – the ignorant were
incited, the successful were blamed for their failures, and the establishment
was driven out and replaced with a dictatorship of the lowest of the low who
happened to be communist community organizers in good standing.
Competitors
were murdered and a few lucky ones were driven out with their lives. As a famous talk show host said on his radio
program, doctors were made dishwashers, and dishwashers became surgeons.
Societies devolved into chaos for many decades and mountains of skulls were
built from the people whose opinions diverged from those of the young communist
organizers.
How do we
change the outlandish psycho-babble created and pushed by liberal college
professors around the country, dangerous ideas and rhetoric that promote and
incite violence?
The college
course accreditation process would be a start. Credentials of insane and
tenured college professors must come under scrutiny. Alumni endowments should cease
until such time that colleges become again places of free exchange of ideas
instead of the radical breeding grounds and nut farms they have become. As one
reader said, "liberals are two clicks away from teaching alchemy,
astrology, charms, and potions.”
Personally I
am proud of who I am, of my merit, and of what I have achieved through very hard
work. Although there were many variables that I had to address along the way,
such as the absence of luck, no college tradition in my family, blue collar
background, gender discrimination, economic destitution at times, I am proud to
be white.
I cannot
change and do not wish to change the melanin content of my skin any more than a
black person can change their skin color. Our parents and God have created us
this way. But the color of our skin should
not define who we are or who we can become. This country has so many
opportunities to succeed, all we have to do is apply ourselves and work hard to
be the best we can be. I and many others like me are proof of that opportunity.
People must
remember that we are not genetically altruistic and humans thrive on
competition not collectivism. Society progresses when individuals with unique
talents and efforts are promoted based on merit, not on entitlements, quotas,
and inferior skills.
If we want
society to devolve to the lowest common denominator, then by all means we must
continue the destruction of the freedom of speech through political correctness
(PC) invented and dictated by tenured professors with a self-loathing complex
and now imposed by society-at-large as the norm.
Highly adept
at deception and disinformation, communist agitators use specific language and divisive
means to promote their utopian agenda. The novice and the naïve are easily swayed
by socialist rhetoric and empty promises. It is perplexing to see how droves of
young white people hang onto every word uttered by their socialist guru, Bernie
Sanders, a white man from the whitest state in the Union who got himself
elected to Congress and mesmerizes them with the promised Western European socialism
as the only hope for minorities in this country.