Respectable hospitals cannot
operate on the basis of a “fundamental human right,” invented by “progressives,”
somebody must pay for health care. Life-saving medical equipment and drugs are expensive.
There is a reason why the
best medical care, equipment, drugs, and doctors in the world exist in
capitalism and not in socialist countries. Individual thinking, creativity, and
entrepreneurship rewarded by profit have improved our lives and our health. Collectivism
resulted in the death of 100 million individuals. Developing each drug cost at
least $950 million and researchers and investors expect to be paid for their financial
risks, research, and ideas.
Americans have always
supported the development of life-saving expensive drugs which were then sold
to other nations for much less than we paid at home or were given away for free.
Americans have thus subsidized the medical treatment of citizens of many
nations.
Hospitals have charged
patients with insurance more to cover expenses for those who did not, could not
pay their bills, or had no insurance, such as illegal aliens. Quite a few smaller
hospitals have closed their doors for that reason alone.
It is true, some people who
get sick and have no health care can die. It is also true that without food people
also die. Is food then a “fundamental human right?” Someone must toil so that
somebody else eats for free?
If you ask “progressives,”
everything should be free and nobody should make a profit because profit is “obscene
and socially unjust.” Yet taxation from capitalist profit and from income
earned supports able-bodied Americans and illegal aliens who choose not to work,
work undocumented, or cannot find a job thanks to the current depressed economy.
At some point the golden goose is going to run out of golden eggs. As Margaret
Thatcher said, the problem with socialism is that you run out of other people’s
money.
Public Citizen, in a
recent fund raising memo asking potential donors for $5, says that Obamacare’s
problem is not the broken website (the obscene development cost of $693 million,
all the lies and misrepresentations of premium costs, keeping your doctors, keeping
your insurance, lower premiums, etc.), the problem is that “we spend more on
health care per person, by far, than any other developed country, yet millions
and millions of our citizens are left without insurance, leading to 45,000
preventable deaths every year.”
The statement is not exactly
accurate. A study of 9,005 individuals who answered questions about race,
ethnicity, income, and household size was reported in December 2009 in the
American Journal of Public Health. These respondents self-evaluated their
health and were examined by doctors. The study “oversampled several groups,
including Black persons, Mexican Americans, the very young (aged 2 months to 5
years) and those aged older than 65 years.”
Based on sound scientific
research, the study contains numerous biases and is hardly a representative sampling
of the uninsured U.S. population.
The study concludes, “Lack
of health insurance is associated with
as many as 44,789 deaths per year in the United States, more than those caused
by kidney disease.” Notice the use of the word “associated with,” it does not say “caused” death. There is a
significant difference. http://www.pnhp.org/excessdeaths/health-insurance-and-mortality-in-US-adults.pdf
The very idea that medical
insurance guarantees prompt, timely, excellent medical care, health, and a good
outcome (life), is preposterous.
The fact that socialized
medicine does cause severe shortages and forces rationing to reduce costs, thus
causing patient deaths by neglect and denial of services seems to escape those
who are so eager to institute socialized medicine in this country.
The CDC does say that
200,000 deaths per year from heart disease and stroke are preventable.
http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/heartdisease-stroke/index.html
The NIH says that preventable
causes of death in the U.S. are associated with diet, lifestyle, and metabolic
rate. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19399161
Obamacare has already left
millions of formerly insured Americans uninsured because the law mandates many
more services that insurance companies cannot cover without raising premiums or
dropping those already insured. It is simple economics, something that liberals
must have slept through in high school and college.
At the end of the full
implementation of Obamacare more Americans will be left without insurance coverage
or dependent on Medicaid than the initial 15 percent who were uninsured before Obamacare
was passed.
Most Americans were
satisfied with their excellent health care, the envy of the rest of the world,
and their insurance. About 15 percent were uninsured, young people who chose to
play insurance roulette based on age, good health, a sense of immortality, and
those unfortunate Americans who could not afford the higher premiums based on
their low incomes, pre-existing conditions, and those who were canceled by
their insurance.
A cheaper solution would
have been to offer federally subsidized insurance to those 15 percent who were
uninsured. It would have been much cheaper than Obamacare.
Public Citizen considers
the situation outrageous that capitalism “still permits the for-profit health
insurance industry to decide who can or cannot see a doctor and to commodify a
fundamental human right.”
Who should then decide?
The federal government, of course, because they do everything else so precisely.
Government care worked really well in Cuba, Venezuela, and Eastern Europe where
socialist/communist governments decided who got medical care, what type, how
much training doctors had, how much they could earn, where they could practice
medicine, how much rationing occurred, who lived and died, and how well the
communist elites were treated in their private hospitals.
Public Citizen is telling
the low information voters that “Our citizens need – and morality demands – a single-payer,
Medicare-for-All system.” Who knew that morality demanded health care? And who
decides the definition of morality? Is it the government or the enlightened “progressives”?
Obamacare was never about
insuring the 15 percent uninsured, it was about control over our bodies, about
impoverishing and making dependent on government those already insured,
bankrupting the insurance companies, and establishing one national single-payer
system run by the IRS and HHS. What can possibly go wrong with such a plan?
“Helping people when they
are sick or injured should not be an industry, like manufacturing lint rollers
or windshields,” says Public Citizen. Yet the national health care system in
the U.K. is the largest employer. It seems to me that it is an industry, an
industry that is run very badly, in which severe rationing occurs and procedural
waiting time for ER admissions, tests, hospitalizations, and surgeries is very
long. The survivability rate from all forms of cancer is much lower than in the
U.S.
Nationalized health care
works well for sniffles but not for serious problems, expensive procedures, and
surgery. One-payer system is very expensive and requires much higher taxes than
Americans currently pay.
Public Citizen promises
its $5 donors that “it will derail attempts to cut Medicare.” That will be
interesting to see especially since the Obama administration is cutting $719
billion from Medicare in the next 10 years in order to fund Obamacare.
Public Citizen is working
with Senator Bernie Sanders, a self-described democratic socialist, and
Representative John Conyers to “boost legislative momentum for single-payer
reform.” The plan is called “Medicare-for-All.” It will ensure every American’s
basic right to health care, saving 45,000 lives every year” and “saving our
country $350 billion or more annually.” I am not sure how they arrived at this
figure but it does not matter, low information voters are easy to convince.
Unless single-payer
Medicare-for-All happens, said the President of Public Citizen, our society
cannot “progress out of this dark chapter in our national story where we allow
120 of our fellow citizens to die every day so that for-profit insurance
industry can perpetuate its profiteering.”
I wonder how many people
will die once the full implementation of Obamacare happens and the 15-member death
panel is in full force. How many people will be denied procedures based on
their age, usefulness to society, disability, political affiliation, ethnicity,
religion, and race?
According to Heritage
Foundation, Obamcare’s new exchanges actually offer very limited choices,
premiums are more expensive for Americans in at least 42 states, and the Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) projects that 7 million people with employer-sponsored
coverage will lose their insurance due to Obamacare.
“Obamacare undermines
American values by discouraging marriage and work.” Worse yet, Obamacare
prioritizes illegal aliens over American citizens and able-bodied adults over
the disabled. Legal, non-citizen residents qualify for federally subsidized
insurance with more and better coverage options than American citizens.
(Morning Bell, The Heritage Foundation, November 27, 2013)
States that expanded
Medicaid programs will automatically enroll in Medicaid Americans with incomes
under 138 percent of the federal poverty level. But non-citizens will have better options via
federal subsidies to purchase coverage in the Obamacare exchanges.
To make matters worse, in
some states, when a person who received lengthy medical treatment under
Medicaid dies, the state goes after the remaining spouse’s assets in order to
reimburse Medicaid.
States that did not expand
Medicaid programs will offer non-citizens the option to purchase subsidized
insurance in the exchanges, while American citizens below 100 percent of the
poverty level will likely not qualify for subsidized coverage. (Morning Bell,
The Heritage Foundation, November 27, 2013)
Obamacare will spend $700
billion on Medicaid expansion in order to cover able-bodied individuals,
millions of unemployed and underemployed, threatening coverage for disabled
Americans, and creating a permanent class that has no financial incentive to
work.
These people will become
permanently dependent on government for every need. The sad truth is that what
government gives generously, it can certainly take away. All we have to do is
look at the sad state of Greece. Many citizens must depend on charities for
serious medical treatment or face death.